Perspectives of Youths on the Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Research and Clinical Care

被引:15
|
作者
Thai, Kelly [1 ,2 ]
Tsiandoulas, Kate H. [1 ]
Stephenson, Elizabeth A. [3 ,4 ]
Menna-Dack, Dolly [5 ]
Shaul, Randi Zlotnik [1 ,4 ]
Anderson, James A. [1 ,6 ]
Shinewald, Alexis R. [7 ]
Ampofo, Augustina [7 ]
McCradden, Melissa D. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Sick Children, Dept Bioeth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Peter Gilgan Ctr Res Learning, Genet & Genome Biol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Hosp Sick Children, Labatt Family Heart Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabil Hosp, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Hosp Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
PUBLIC-ATTITUDES; CONSENT; RECORD;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.10659
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Understanding the views and values of patients is of substantial importance to developing the ethical parameters of artificial intelligence (AI) use in medicine. Thus far, there is limited study on the views of children and youths. Their perspectives contribute meaningfully to the integration of AI in medicine. OBJECTIVE To explore the moral attitudes and views of children and youths regarding research and clinical care involving health AI at the point of care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This qualitative study recruited participants younger than 18 years during a 1-year period (October 2021 to March 2022) at a large urban pediatric hospital. A total of 44 individuals who were receiving or had previously received care at a hospital or rehabilitation clinic contacted the research team, but 15 were found to be ineligible. Of the 29 who consented to participate, 1 was lost to follow-up, resulting in 28 participants who completed the interview. EXPOSURES Participants were interviewed using vignettes on 3 main themes: (1) health data research, (2) clinical AI trials, and (3) clinical use of AI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Thematic description of values surrounding health data research, interventional AI research, and clinical use of AI. RESULTS The 28 participants included 6 children (ages, 10-12 years) and 22 youths (ages, 13-17 years) (16 female, 10 male, and 3 trans/nonbinary/gender diverse). Mean (SD) age was 15 (2) years. Participants were highly engaged and quite knowledgeable about AI. They expressed a positive view of research intended to help others and had strong feelings about the uses of their health data for AI. Participants expressed appreciation for the vulnerability of potential participants in interventional AI trials and reinforced the importance of respect for their preferences regardless of their decisional capacity. A strong theme for the prospective use of clinical AI was the desire to maintain bedside interaction between the patient and their physician. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, children and youths reported generally positive views of AI, expressing strong interest and advocacy for their involvement in AI research and inclusion of their voices for shared decision-making with AI in clinical care. These findings suggest the need for more engagement of children and youths in health care AI research and integration.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Health Care Equity in the Use of Advanced Analytics and Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Primary Care
    Clark, Cheryl R.
    Wilkins, Consuelo Hopkins
    Rodriguez, Jorge A.
    Preininger, Anita M.
    Harris, Joyce
    DesAutels, Spencer
    Karunakaram, Hema
    Rhee, Kyu
    Bates, David W.
    Dankwa-Mullan, Irene
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (10) : 3188 - 3193
  • [32] Regulation of Health and Health Care Artificial Intelligence
    Mello, Michelle M.
    Cohen, I. Glenn
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2025,
  • [33] The ethical dimensions of utilizing Artificial Intelligence in palliative care
    Oh, Oonjee
    Demiris, George
    Ulrich, Connie M.
    NURSING ETHICS, 2024,
  • [34] Complexities of artificial intelligence in health care
    Liu, William
    Narang, Birinder
    BRITISH COLUMBIA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 66 (05):
  • [35] Questions for Artificial Intelligence in Health Care
    Maddox, Thomas M.
    Rumsfeld, John S.
    Payne, Philip R. O.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2019, 321 (01): : 31 - 32
  • [36] Generative Artificial Intelligence in Health Care
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    Siemens, D. Robert
    Gill, Inderbir
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 210 (05): : 723 - 725
  • [37] Translating Artificial Intelligence Into Clinical Care
    Beam, Andrew L.
    Kohane, Isaac S.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 316 (22): : 2368 - 2369
  • [38] Generative artificial intelligence and ethical considerations in health care: a scoping review and ethics checklist
    Ning, Yilin
    Teixayavong, Salinelat
    Shang, Yuqing
    Savulescu, Julian
    Nagaraj, Vaishaanth
    Miao, Di
    Mertens, Mayli
    Ting, Daniel Shu Wei
    Ong, Jasmine Chiat Ling
    Liu, Mingxuan
    Cao, Jiuwen
    Dunn, Michael
    Vaughan, Roger
    Ong, Marcus Eng Hock
    Sung, Joseph Jao-Yiu
    Topol, Eric J.
    Liu, Nan
    LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 6 (11): : e848 - e856
  • [39] Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Care: Management Implications, Ethical Challenges, and Policy Considerations
    Hoose, Stephan
    Kralikova, Kristina
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (09)
  • [40] Artificial intelligence and machine learning in intensive care research and clinical application
    Peine, A.
    Lutge, C.
    Poszler, F.
    Celi, L.
    Schoffski, O.
    Marx, G.
    Martin, L.
    ANASTHESIOLOGIE & INTENSIVMEDIZIN, 2020, 61 : 372 - 384