The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers

被引:2
|
作者
Shoesmith, Emily [1 ]
Gibsone, Selina [2 ]
Ratschen, Elena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York YO10 5DD, England
[2] Frances Hay Ctr, Dogs Good, Blacklocks Hill, Banbury OX17 2BS, England
关键词
COVID-19; health promotion; lockdown; DOG;
D O I
10.1093/pubmed/fdac126
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) are increasingly common in UK health settings. The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted on their delivery, with many organizations offering AAIs virtually during lockdown periods. This small-scale survey aims to explore the impact of Covid-19 on the delivery of AAIs, and associated challenges and opportunities. Methods A cross-sectional, retrospective questionnaire survey was conducted with UK AAI providers. The anonymized survey was distributed via academic and third sector networks and social media. Descriptive statistics and free-text responses are presented. Results Thirty-six AAI providers completed the survey. Of these, 83.3% continued to deliver AAIs during the pandemic. Twenty-eight delivered AAIs remotely and highlighted associated challenges, such as clients being unable to touch the animal, and clients having restricted access to the required technology. Over half reported their animal missed face-to-face interaction. However, they also reported advantages to remote delivery, such as for those who are allergic or fearful of animals. The most commonly reported challenges of in situ delivery included difficulty maintaining distance from the client and the use of face masks, which were perceived to hinder communication. Conclusion The transition to remote delivery has highlighted challenges and opportunities. Further research could explore these in greater depth and compare the impact of different delivery modes.
引用
收藏
页码:E303 / E308
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biophilia in Animal-Assisted Interventions-Fad or Fact?
    Joye, Yannick
    ANTHROZOOS, 2011, 24 (01): : 5 - 15
  • [42] Merope Pavlides: Animal-assisted Interventions for Individuals with Autism
    Adams, Nena
    JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2010, 40 (01) : 132 - 133
  • [43] Animal-assisted interventions for military families: a systematic review
    Nieforth, Leanne O.
    Leighton, Sarah C.
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [44] Feasibility of Animal-Assisted Interventions for Children with Advanced Cancer
    Cowfer, Brittany
    Carell, Monroe, Jr.
    Gilmer, Mary Jo
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2022, 63 (05) : 939 - 939
  • [45] Impact of Animal-Assisted Therapy for Outpatients with Fibromyalgia
    Marcus, Dawn A.
    Bernstein, Cheryl D.
    Constantin, Janet M.
    Kunkel, Frank A.
    Breuer, Paula
    Hanlon, Raymond B.
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (01) : 43 - 51
  • [46] Animal-Assisted Interventions and Animal Welfare-An Exploratory Survey in Germany
    Ameli, Katharina
    Braun, Theresa F.
    Kraemer, Stephanie
    ANIMALS, 2023, 13 (08):
  • [47] A One Health Research Framework for Animal-Assisted Interventions
    Hediger, Karin
    Meisser, Andrea
    Zinsstag, Jakob
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (04)
  • [48] Applying One Health to the Study of Animal-Assisted Interventions
    Darlene Chalmers
    Colleen Anne Dell
    EcoHealth, 2015, 12 : 560 - 562
  • [49] Animal-assisted Group Psychotherapy
    Blesch, Katharina Sabine
    GRUPPENPSYCHOTHERAPIE UND GRUPPENDYNAMIK, 2015, 51 (02) : 86 - 97
  • [50] Parasitic infections in dogs involved in animal-assisted interventions
    Gerardi, Federica
    Santaniello, Antonio
    Del Prete, Luisa
    Maurelli, Maria Paola
    Menna, Lucia Francesca
    Rinaldi, Laura
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 17 (01) : 269 - 272