The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers

被引:2
|
作者
Shoesmith, Emily [1 ]
Gibsone, Selina [2 ]
Ratschen, Elena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York YO10 5DD, England
[2] Frances Hay Ctr, Dogs Good, Blacklocks Hill, Banbury OX17 2BS, England
关键词
COVID-19; health promotion; lockdown; DOG;
D O I
10.1093/pubmed/fdac126
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) are increasingly common in UK health settings. The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted on their delivery, with many organizations offering AAIs virtually during lockdown periods. This small-scale survey aims to explore the impact of Covid-19 on the delivery of AAIs, and associated challenges and opportunities. Methods A cross-sectional, retrospective questionnaire survey was conducted with UK AAI providers. The anonymized survey was distributed via academic and third sector networks and social media. Descriptive statistics and free-text responses are presented. Results Thirty-six AAI providers completed the survey. Of these, 83.3% continued to deliver AAIs during the pandemic. Twenty-eight delivered AAIs remotely and highlighted associated challenges, such as clients being unable to touch the animal, and clients having restricted access to the required technology. Over half reported their animal missed face-to-face interaction. However, they also reported advantages to remote delivery, such as for those who are allergic or fearful of animals. The most commonly reported challenges of in situ delivery included difficulty maintaining distance from the client and the use of face masks, which were perceived to hinder communication. Conclusion The transition to remote delivery has highlighted challenges and opportunities. Further research could explore these in greater depth and compare the impact of different delivery modes.
引用
收藏
页码:E303 / E308
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] French handlers' perspectives on Animal-Assisted Interventions
    Mignot, Alice
    de Luca, Karelle
    Leboucher, Gerard
    Servais, Veronique
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 44
  • [22] Animal-assisted intervention in the ICU: a tool for humanization
    Megan M. Hosey
    Janice Jaskulski
    Stephen T. Wegener
    Linda L. Chlan
    Dale M. Needham
    Critical Care, 22
  • [23] Perceptions of animal-assisted interventions: The influence of attitudes toward companion animals
    Crossman, Molly K.
    Kazdin, Alan E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 74 (04) : 566 - 578
  • [24] Animal-assisted intervention in the ICU: a tool for humanization
    Hosey, Megan M.
    Jaskulski, Janice
    Wegener, Stephen T.
    Chlan, Linda L.
    Needham, Dale M.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 22
  • [25] Animal-Assisted Support: Actionable Intervention for Burnout
    Jones-Schenk, Jan
    JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, 2020, 51 (11): : 496 - 497
  • [26] An Animal-Assisted Therapy Intervention with Female Inmates
    Jasperson, Rachael A.
    ANTHROZOOS, 2013, 26 (01): : 135 - 145
  • [27] Robotic animal-assisted therapy as a complementary therapy in clinical practice: Exploring animal-assisted intervention professional perspectives
    Burr, Macy
    Buntich, Jordan
    Gonzalez, Marissa
    Miranda, Stephanie
    Vu, Tuyen
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 52
  • [28] A COMPARISON OF ANIMAL-ASSISTED THERAPY AND ANIMAL-ASSISTED ACTIVITIES WITH DOGS IN SWEDISH RESIDENTIAL CARE
    Nord, C.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2010, 50 : 32 - 32
  • [29] Animal-Assisted Intervention and Dementia: A Systematic Review
    Yakimicki, Michelle L.
    Edwards, Nancy E.
    Richards, Elizabeth
    Beck, Alan M.
    CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (01) : 9 - 29
  • [30] Mainstreaming Animal-Assisted Therapy
    Palley, Lori S.
    O'Rourke, P. Pearl
    Niemi, Steven M.
    ILAR JOURNAL, 2010, 51 (03) : 199 - 207