The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers

被引:2
|
作者
Shoesmith, Emily [1 ]
Gibsone, Selina [2 ]
Ratschen, Elena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York YO10 5DD, England
[2] Frances Hay Ctr, Dogs Good, Blacklocks Hill, Banbury OX17 2BS, England
关键词
COVID-19; health promotion; lockdown; DOG;
D O I
10.1093/pubmed/fdac126
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) are increasingly common in UK health settings. The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted on their delivery, with many organizations offering AAIs virtually during lockdown periods. This small-scale survey aims to explore the impact of Covid-19 on the delivery of AAIs, and associated challenges and opportunities. Methods A cross-sectional, retrospective questionnaire survey was conducted with UK AAI providers. The anonymized survey was distributed via academic and third sector networks and social media. Descriptive statistics and free-text responses are presented. Results Thirty-six AAI providers completed the survey. Of these, 83.3% continued to deliver AAIs during the pandemic. Twenty-eight delivered AAIs remotely and highlighted associated challenges, such as clients being unable to touch the animal, and clients having restricted access to the required technology. Over half reported their animal missed face-to-face interaction. However, they also reported advantages to remote delivery, such as for those who are allergic or fearful of animals. The most commonly reported challenges of in situ delivery included difficulty maintaining distance from the client and the use of face masks, which were perceived to hinder communication. Conclusion The transition to remote delivery has highlighted challenges and opportunities. Further research could explore these in greater depth and compare the impact of different delivery modes.
引用
收藏
页码:E303 / E308
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Animal-assisted Interventions in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
    Eizaguirre, Barbara
    Alonso, Ricardo
    Lopez, Pablo A.
    Diaz Videla, Marcos
    CALIDAD DE VIDA Y SALUD, 2020, 13 : 175 - +
  • [12] Staff Members' Perceptions of an Animal-Assisted Activity
    Bibbo, Jessica
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2013, 40 (04) : E320 - E326
  • [13] Current challenges to research on animal-assisted interventions
    Serpell, James
    McCune, Sandra
    Gee, Nancy
    Griffin, James A.
    APPLIED DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2017, 21 (03) : 223 - 233
  • [14] Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Animal-Assisted Activities in Pediatric Hospitals
    Chubak, Jessica
    Pocobelli, Gaia
    Ziebell, Rebecca A.
    Hawkes, Rene J.
    Adler, Amanda
    Bobb, Jennifer F.
    Zerr, Danielle M.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEALTH CARE, 2023, 37 (02) : 173 - 178
  • [15] Benefits of animal-assisted interventions to young offenders
    Jacob, Catherine
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2011, 169 (05) : 115 - 117
  • [16] Animal-Assisted Interventions for Dementia A Systematic Review
    Babka, Jennifer R.
    Lane, Kari R.
    Johnson, Rebecca A.
    RESEARCH IN GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING, 2021, 14 (06) : 317 - +
  • [17] Animal-assisted interventions research: Issues and answers
    Johnson, RA
    Odendaal, JSJ
    Meadows, RL
    WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2002, 24 (04) : 422 - 440
  • [18] Animal-Assisted Interventions for Children with Advanced Cancer: Child and Parent Perceptions
    Cowfer, Brittany A.
    Akard, Terrah Foster
    Gilmer, Mary Jo
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2021, 2 (01): : 328 - 334
  • [19] Animal-assisted Interventions as an Adjunct to ABA Services: Clinician Practices and Perceptions
    Jessica L Ghai
    Donna H Lehr
    Nancy E Harayama
    Fred Spooner
    Alexandra Protopopova
    Behavior Analysis in Practice, 2022, 15 : 659 - 676
  • [20] Animal-assisted Interventions as an Adjunct to ABA Services: Clinician Practices and Perceptions
    Ghai, Jessica L.
    Lehr, Donna H.
    Harayama, Nancy E.
    Spooner, Fred
    Protopopova, Alexandra
    BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS IN PRACTICE, 2022, 15 (03) : 659 - 676