The impact of Covid-19 on animal-assisted interventions: perceptions of UK animal-assisted intervention providers

被引:2
|
作者
Shoesmith, Emily [1 ]
Gibsone, Selina [2 ]
Ratschen, Elena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York YO10 5DD, England
[2] Frances Hay Ctr, Dogs Good, Blacklocks Hill, Banbury OX17 2BS, England
关键词
COVID-19; health promotion; lockdown; DOG;
D O I
10.1093/pubmed/fdac126
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Animal-assisted interventions (AAIs) are increasingly common in UK health settings. The Covid-19 pandemic has impacted on their delivery, with many organizations offering AAIs virtually during lockdown periods. This small-scale survey aims to explore the impact of Covid-19 on the delivery of AAIs, and associated challenges and opportunities. Methods A cross-sectional, retrospective questionnaire survey was conducted with UK AAI providers. The anonymized survey was distributed via academic and third sector networks and social media. Descriptive statistics and free-text responses are presented. Results Thirty-six AAI providers completed the survey. Of these, 83.3% continued to deliver AAIs during the pandemic. Twenty-eight delivered AAIs remotely and highlighted associated challenges, such as clients being unable to touch the animal, and clients having restricted access to the required technology. Over half reported their animal missed face-to-face interaction. However, they also reported advantages to remote delivery, such as for those who are allergic or fearful of animals. The most commonly reported challenges of in situ delivery included difficulty maintaining distance from the client and the use of face masks, which were perceived to hinder communication. Conclusion The transition to remote delivery has highlighted challenges and opportunities. Further research could explore these in greater depth and compare the impact of different delivery modes.
引用
收藏
页码:E303 / E308
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Collaboration in Animal-Assisted Activities and Animal-Assisted Therapy
    Decina, Elizabeth
    Evangelista, Bernadette
    Harantschuk, Alicia
    SEMINARS IN SPEECH AND LANGUAGE, 2022, 43 (01) : 54 - 61
  • [2] Animal-assisted and robotic animal-assisted interventions within dementia care: A systematic review
    Shoesmith, Emily
    Surr, Claire
    Ratschen, Elena
    DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 22 (03): : 664 - 693
  • [3] Health Benefits of Animal-Assisted Interventions
    Morrison, Michele L.
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 12 (01): : 51 - 62
  • [4] Allergologic pitfalls in animal-assisted interventions
    Veronika Schmidt
    Michaela Mokrá
    Pashija Demolli
    Marie-Charlotte Brüggen
    Matthias Möhrenschlager
    Allergo Journal International, 2022, 31 (5) : 145 - 147
  • [5] Policies clarify animal-assisted interventions
    不详
    JAVMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 246 (11): : 1164 - 1164
  • [6] Animal-assisted interventions and vulnerable tourists
    Wen, Jun
    ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 2023, 103
  • [7] Assessing the impact of an animal-assisted intervention for jail inmates
    Kunz-Lomelin, Alan
    Nordberg, Anne
    JOURNAL OF OFFENDER REHABILITATION, 2020, 59 (02) : 65 - 80
  • [8] Animal-assisted therapy
    Schreiber, Janina
    Kuhn, Jens
    FORTSCHRITTE DER NEUROLOGIE PSYCHIATRIE, 2019, 87 (05) : 282 - 283
  • [9] Animal-assisted therapy
    Stanley-Hermanns, M
    Miller, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2002, 102 (10) : 69 - +
  • [10] Animal-assisted interventions in acute inpatient geriatrics
    Dreseler, Jacqueline
    Kugler, Christiane
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 2020, 53 (01): : 51 - 58