Learning and optimization under epistemic uncertainty with Bayesian hybrid models

被引:4
|
作者
Eugene, Elvis A. [1 ,2 ]
Jones, Kyla D. [1 ]
Gao, Xian [1 ]
Wang, Jialu [1 ]
Dowling, Alexander W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Pfizer Worldwide Res & Dev, Groton, CT 06340 USA
关键词
Bayesian inference; Optimization under uncertainty; Grey-box modeling; Digital twins; PROCESS SYSTEMS; DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; CHEMICAL-PROCESSES; NEURAL-NETWORK; DATA-DRIVEN; CALIBRATION; CO2; SIMULATION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108430
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Hybrid (i.e., grey-box) models are a powerful and flexible paradigm for predictive science and engineering. Grey-box models use data-driven constructs to incorporate unknown or computationally intractable phenomena into glass-box mechanistic models. The pioneering work of statisticians Kennedy and O'Hagan introduced a new paradigm to quantify epistemic (i.e., model-form) uncertainty. While popular in several engineering disciplines, prior work using Kennedy-O'Hagan hybrid models focuses on prediction with accurate uncertainty estimates. This work demonstrates computational strategies to deploy Bayesian hybrid models for optimization under uncertainty. Specifically, the posterior distributions of Bayesian hybrid models provide a principled uncertainty set for stochastic programming, chance-constrained optimization, or robust optimization. Through two illustrative case studies, we demonstrate the efficacy of hybrid models, composed of a structurally inadequate glass-box model and Gaussian process bias correction term, for decision-making using limited training data. From these case studies, we develop recommended best practices and explore the trade-offs between different hybrid model architectures.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Learning and Optimization with Bayesian Hybrid Models
    Eugene, Elvis A.
    Gao, Xian
    Dowling, Alexander W.
    [J]. 2020 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2020, : 3997 - 4002
  • [2] Bayesian optimization for learning gaits under uncertainty
    Calandra, Roberto
    Seyfarth, Andre
    Peters, Jan
    Deisenroth, Marc Peter
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2016, 76 (1-2) : 5 - 23
  • [3] A Hybrid Optimization Method for Solving Bayesian Inverse Problems under Uncertainty
    Zhang, Kai
    Wang, Zengfei
    Zhang, Liming
    Yao, Jun
    Yan, Xia
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08):
  • [4] Maintenance Optimization of Wind Turbines Under Epistemic Uncertainty
    Huang, Tudi
    Liu, Yu
    Li, Yanfeng
    Bai, Song
    Huang, Hongzhong
    [J]. Dianzi Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2023, 52 (02): : 306 - 312
  • [5] Epistemic uncertainty in Bayesian predictive probabilities
    Liu, Charles C.
    Yu, Ron Xiaolong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2024, 34 (03) : 394 - 412
  • [6] Multi-Fidelity Design Optimization under Epistemic Uncertainty
    Hou, Liqiang
    Tan, Wei
    Ma, Hong
    [J]. 2016 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2016, : 4452 - 4459
  • [7] A Bayesian foundation for individual learning under uncertainty
    Mathys, Christoph
    Daunizeau, Jean
    Friston, Karl J.
    Stephan, Klaas E.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 5 : 9
  • [8] The role of epistemic uncertainty of contact models in the design and optimization of mechanical systems with aleatoric uncertainty
    M. R. Brake
    [J]. Nonlinear Dynamics, 2014, 77 : 899 - 922
  • [9] The role of epistemic uncertainty of contact models in the design and optimization of mechanical systems with aleatoric uncertainty
    Brake, M. R.
    [J]. NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2014, 77 (03) : 899 - 922
  • [10] Information-Theoretic Analysis of Epistemic Uncertainty in Bayesian Meta-learning
    Jose, Sharu Theresa
    Park, Sangwoo
    Simeone, Osvaldo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND STATISTICS, VOL 151, 2022, 151