Learning and optimization under epistemic uncertainty with Bayesian hybrid models

被引:4
|
作者
Eugene, Elvis A. [1 ,2 ]
Jones, Kyla D. [1 ]
Gao, Xian [1 ]
Wang, Jialu [1 ]
Dowling, Alexander W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Pfizer Worldwide Res & Dev, Groton, CT 06340 USA
关键词
Bayesian inference; Optimization under uncertainty; Grey-box modeling; Digital twins; PROCESS SYSTEMS; DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; CHEMICAL-PROCESSES; NEURAL-NETWORK; DATA-DRIVEN; CALIBRATION; CO2; SIMULATION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108430
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Hybrid (i.e., grey-box) models are a powerful and flexible paradigm for predictive science and engineering. Grey-box models use data-driven constructs to incorporate unknown or computationally intractable phenomena into glass-box mechanistic models. The pioneering work of statisticians Kennedy and O'Hagan introduced a new paradigm to quantify epistemic (i.e., model-form) uncertainty. While popular in several engineering disciplines, prior work using Kennedy-O'Hagan hybrid models focuses on prediction with accurate uncertainty estimates. This work demonstrates computational strategies to deploy Bayesian hybrid models for optimization under uncertainty. Specifically, the posterior distributions of Bayesian hybrid models provide a principled uncertainty set for stochastic programming, chance-constrained optimization, or robust optimization. Through two illustrative case studies, we demonstrate the efficacy of hybrid models, composed of a structurally inadequate glass-box model and Gaussian process bias correction term, for decision-making using limited training data. From these case studies, we develop recommended best practices and explore the trade-offs between different hybrid model architectures.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Bayesian Interpretation of the Monty Hall Problem with Epistemic Uncertainty
    Manfredotti, Cristina
    Viappiani, Paolo
    [J]. MODELING DECISIONS FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (MDAI 2021), 2021, 12898 : 93 - 105
  • [42] Model validation under epistemic uncertainty
    Sankararaman, Shankar
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (09) : 1232 - 1241
  • [43] A scenario analysis under epistemic uncertainty in Natech accidents: imprecise probability reasoning in Bayesian Network
    Wang, Qiuhan
    Cai, Mei
    Wei, Guo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 4 (01):
  • [44] Reliability analysis under epistemic uncertainty
    Nannapaneni, Saideep
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 155 : 9 - 20
  • [45] Deliberative modality under epistemic uncertainty
    Cariani, Fabrizio
    Kaufmann, Magdalena
    Kaufmann, Stefan
    [J]. LINGUISTICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 2013, 36 (03) : 225 - 259
  • [46] Deliberative modality under epistemic uncertainty
    Fabrizio Cariani
    Magdalena Kaufmann
    Stefan Kaufmann
    [J]. Linguistics and Philosophy, 2013, 36 : 225 - 259
  • [47] Epistemic Modality and Coordination under Uncertainty
    Sbardolini, Giorgio
    [J]. ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021, 335 : 295 - 306
  • [48] Epistemic Modality and Coordination under Uncertainty
    Sbardolini, Giorgio
    [J]. ELECTRONIC PROCEEDINGS IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021, (335): : 295 - 306
  • [49] Optimization Models for Production and Procurement Decisions Under Uncertainty
    Zhen, Lu
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2016, 46 (03): : 370 - 383
  • [50] Bayesian Models, Delusional Beliefs, and Epistemic Possibilities
    Parrott, Matthew
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2016, 67 (01): : 271 - 296