Learning and optimization under epistemic uncertainty with Bayesian hybrid models

被引:4
|
作者
Eugene, Elvis A. [1 ,2 ]
Jones, Kyla D. [1 ]
Gao, Xian [1 ]
Wang, Jialu [1 ]
Dowling, Alexander W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Pfizer Worldwide Res & Dev, Groton, CT 06340 USA
关键词
Bayesian inference; Optimization under uncertainty; Grey-box modeling; Digital twins; PROCESS SYSTEMS; DYNAMIC OPTIMIZATION; ROBUST OPTIMIZATION; CHEMICAL-PROCESSES; NEURAL-NETWORK; DATA-DRIVEN; CALIBRATION; CO2; SIMULATION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108430
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Hybrid (i.e., grey-box) models are a powerful and flexible paradigm for predictive science and engineering. Grey-box models use data-driven constructs to incorporate unknown or computationally intractable phenomena into glass-box mechanistic models. The pioneering work of statisticians Kennedy and O'Hagan introduced a new paradigm to quantify epistemic (i.e., model-form) uncertainty. While popular in several engineering disciplines, prior work using Kennedy-O'Hagan hybrid models focuses on prediction with accurate uncertainty estimates. This work demonstrates computational strategies to deploy Bayesian hybrid models for optimization under uncertainty. Specifically, the posterior distributions of Bayesian hybrid models provide a principled uncertainty set for stochastic programming, chance-constrained optimization, or robust optimization. Through two illustrative case studies, we demonstrate the efficacy of hybrid models, composed of a structurally inadequate glass-box model and Gaussian process bias correction term, for decision-making using limited training data. From these case studies, we develop recommended best practices and explore the trade-offs between different hybrid model architectures.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hybrid Offline/Online Optimization Under Uncertainty
    De Filippo, Allegra
    Lombardi, Michele
    Milano, Michela
    [J]. ECAI 2020: 24TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 325 : 2899 - 2900
  • [22] Green investment under policy uncertainty and Bayesian learning
    Dalby, Peder A. O.
    Gillerhaugen, Gisle R.
    Hagspiel, Verena
    Leth-Olsen, Tord
    Thijssen, Jacco J. J.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 161 : 1262 - 1281
  • [23] System safety assessment under epistemic uncertainty: Using imprecise probabilities in Bayesian network
    Khakzad, Nima
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2019, 116 : 149 - 160
  • [24] Uncertainty Theory-Based Structural Reliability Analysis and Design Optimization under Epistemic Uncertainty
    Zhou, Shuang
    Zhang, Jianguo
    Zhang, Qingyuan
    Huang, Ying
    Wen, Meilin
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [25] Hyperparameter optimization for machine learning models based on Bayesian optimization
    Wu, Jia
    Chen, Xiu-Yun
    Zhang, Hao
    Xiong, Li-Dong
    Lei, Hang
    Deng, Si-Hao
    [J]. Journal of Electronic Science and Technology, 2019, 17 (01) : 26 - 40
  • [26] Hyperparameter Optimization for Machine Learning Models Based on Bayesian Optimization
    Jia Wu
    Xiu-Yun Chen
    Hao Zhang
    Li-Dong Xiong
    Hang Lei
    Si-Hao Deng
    [J]. Journal of Electronic Science and Technology, 2019, (01) : 26 - 40
  • [27] Hyperparameter Optimization for Machine Learning Models Based on Bayesian Optimization
    Jia Wu
    XiuYun Chen
    Hao Zhang
    LiDong Xiong
    Hang Lei
    SiHao Deng
    [J]. Journal of Electronic Science and Technology, 2019, 17 (01) - 40
  • [28] Bayesian Active Learning for Optimization and Uncertainty Quantification in Protein Docking
    Cao, Yue
    Shen, Yang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION, 2020, 16 (08) : 5334 - 5347
  • [29] Epistemic Uncertainty, Rival Models, and Closure
    Taylor, C.
    Murnane, R.
    Graf, W.
    Lee, Y.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS REVIEW, 2013, 14 (01) : 42 - 51
  • [30] Epistemic Uncertainty Propagation in Power Models
    Gribaudo, Marco
    Pinciroli, Riccardo
    Trivedi, Kishor
    [J]. ELECTRONIC NOTES IN THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2018, 337 : 67 - 86