A Bayesian foundation for individual learning under uncertainty

被引:388
|
作者
Mathys, Christoph [1 ,2 ]
Daunizeau, Jean [1 ,3 ]
Friston, Karl J. [3 ]
Stephan, Klaas E. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Lab Social & Neural Syst Res, Dept Econ, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] ETH, Inst Biomed Engn, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] UCL, Wellcome Trust Ctr Neuroimaging, Inst Neurol, London, England
来源
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
hierarchical models; variational Bayes; neuromodulation; dopamine; acetylcholine; serotonin; decision-making; volatility; PREDICTION ERROR; FREE-ENERGY; DOPAMINE; SCHIZOPHRENIA; ROLES; NEUROMODULATION; INFORMATION; INFERENCE; DYNAMICS; VISION;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2011.00039
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Computational learning models are critical for understanding mechanisms of adaptive behavior. However, the two major current frameworks, reinforcement learning (RL) and Bayesian learning, both have certain limitations. For example, many Bayesian models are agnostic of inter-individual variability and involve complicated integrals, making online learning difficult. Here, we introduce a generic hierarchical Bayesian framework for individual learning under multiple forms of uncertainty (e. g., environmental volatility and perceptual uncertainty). The model assumes Gaussian random walks of states at all but the first level, with the step size determined by the next highest level. The coupling between levels is controlled by parameters that shape the influence of uncertainty on learning in a subject-specific fashion. Using variational Bayes under a mean-field approximation and a novel approximation to the posterior energy function, we derive trial-by-trial update equations which (i) are analytical and extremely efficient, enabling real-time learning, (ii) have a natural interpretation in terms of RL, and (iii) contain parameters representing processes which play a key role in current theories of learning, e. g., precision-weighting of prediction error. These parameters allow for the expression of individual differences in learning and may relate to specific neuromodulatory mechanisms in the brain. Our model is very general: it can deal with both discrete and continuous states and equally accounts for deterministic and probabilistic relations between environmental events and perceptual states (i. e., situations with and without perceptual uncertainty). These properties are illustrated by simulations and analyses of empirical time series. Overall, our framework provides a novel foundation for understanding normal and pathological learning that contextualizes RL within a generic Bayesian scheme and thus connects it to principles of optimality from probability theory.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bayesian optimization for learning gaits under uncertainty
    Calandra, Roberto
    Seyfarth, Andre
    Peters, Jan
    Deisenroth, Marc Peter
    [J]. ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2016, 76 (1-2) : 5 - 23
  • [2] Green investment under policy uncertainty and Bayesian learning
    Dalby, Peder A. O.
    Gillerhaugen, Gisle R.
    Hagspiel, Verena
    Leth-Olsen, Tord
    Thijssen, Jacco J. J.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2018, 161 : 1262 - 1281
  • [3] Learning and optimization under epistemic uncertainty with Bayesian hybrid models
    Eugene, Elvis A.
    Jones, Kyla D.
    Gao, Xian
    Wang, Jialu
    Dowling, Alexander W.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 179
  • [4] Sparse Bayesian Learning for Compressed Sensing under Measurement Matrix Uncertainty
    Wang, Shengchu
    Li, Yunzhou
    Wang, Jing
    [J]. 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (WCSP 2013), 2013,
  • [5] A Bayesian Reinforcement Learning Method for Periodic Robotic Control Under Significant Uncertainty
    Jia, Yuanyuan
    Eljuri, Pedro Miguel Uriguen
    Taniguchi, Tadahiro
    [J]. 2023 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS, IROS, 2023, : 384 - 391
  • [6] Consumers' Bayesian learning under Knightian uncertainty: An eye-tracking analysis
    Song, Hongjuan
    Jiang, Yushi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR, 2018, 17 (06) : 569 - 584
  • [7] Learning under uncertainty: a comparison between R-W and Bayesian approach
    Huang, He
    Paulus, Martin
    [J]. ADVANCES IN NEURAL INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMS 29 (NIPS 2016), 2016, 29
  • [8] BAYESIAN NETWORK LEARNING FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION
    Hu, Zhen
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2017, VOL 2A, 2017,
  • [9] Bayesian Verification under Model Uncertainty
    Belzner, Lenz
    Gabor, Thomas
    [J]. 2017 IEEE/ACM 3RD INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING FOR SMART CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS (SESCPS 2017), 2017, : 10 - 13
  • [10] Dynamic decision-making under uncertainty: Bayesian learning in environmental game theory
    Zhou, J.
    Petrosian, O. L.
    Gao, H.
    [J]. VESTNIK SANKT-PETERBURGSKOGO UNIVERSITETA SERIYA 10 PRIKLADNAYA MATEMATIKA INFORMATIKA PROTSESSY UPRAVLENIYA, 2024, 20 (02):