An overview of environmental co-benefits and trade-offs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in municipal wastewater management

被引:5
|
作者
Zheng, Xinyu [1 ]
Lam, Ka Leung [2 ]
机构
[1] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Environm Sci & Engn, Suzhou 215009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Duke Kunshan Univ, Div Nat & Appl Sci, 8 Duke Ave, Kunshan 215316, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Wastewater treatment; Greenhouse gas emissions reduction; Life cycle assessment; Environmental impact; Environmental performance; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; TREATMENT PLANTS; FOOD WASTE; PHOSPHORUS RECOVERY; ENERGY NEUTRALITY; SYSTEMS; ALTERNATIVES; RECLAMATION; DIGESTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2024.02.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many opportunities are available to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with municipal wastewater management. The vision of low -carbon or carbon -neutral operation of wastewater treatment plants is emerging. Is the vision of low -carbon wastewater management consistent with improving environmental performances? Here, we explored this question using wastewater management life cycle assessment studies that had scenarios with GHG emissions reduction through alternative wastewater treatment options, sludge treatment options, and resource recovery options. Among these options that contribute to GHG emissions reduction, integrating resource recovery (i.e., water, biogas, phosphorus) appears to have greater chances of co -benefits (especially on acidification, eutrophication, and photochemical oxidant formation). In contrast, shifting sludge disposal practices require more attention to their potential trade-offs (especially on eutrophication and toxicity). It is evident that achieving GHG emissions reduction oftentimes involves compromising on other environmental performances. While more GHG emissions reduction and environmental co -benefits can be seen in most of the scenarios and impact categories (over 75% combining), achieving GHG emissions reduction can still lead to deteriorating of at least one of the environmental impact categories in over half of all the scenarios. Instead of exclusively focusing only on GHG emissions mitigation, abatement strategies from municipal wastewater management systems should also consider harnessing environmental co -benefits and alleviating unintended environmental trade-offs. Identifying the potential contributing factors behind environmental trade-offs can also represent opportunities for optimizing the design and operation of these GHG emissions reduction options. Into the future, wastewater management needs to adopt a broader systems perspective considering the wider system boundary and environmental scope.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Co-benefits and trade-offs between biodiversity, carbon storage and water flow regulation
    Onaindia, Miren
    Fernandez de Manuel, Beatriz
    Madariaga, Iosu
    Rodriguez-Loinaz, Gloria
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 289 : 1 - 9
  • [22] Integrated crop–livestock–bioenergy system brings co-benefits and trade-offs in mitigating the environmental impacts of Chinese agriculture
    Jiahao Xing
    Junnian Song
    Chaoshuo Liu
    Wei Yang
    Haiyan Duan
    Helmut Yabar
    Jingzheng Ren
    Nature Food, 2022, 3 : 1052 - 1064
  • [23] Life cycle assessment demonstrates environmental co-benefits and trade-offs of low-carbon electricity supply options
    Gibon, Thomas
    Arvesen, Anders
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 76 : 1283 - 1290
  • [24] Are there trade-offs in valuation with respect to greenhouse gas emissions, origin and food miles attributes?
    Akaichi, Faical
    Nayga, Rodolfo M., Jr.
    Nalley, Lawton Lanier
    EUROPEAN REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 44 (01) : 3 - 31
  • [25] Public health co-benefits of greenhouse gas emissions reduction: A systematic review
    Gao, Jinghong
    Kovats, Sari
    Vardoulakis, Sotiris
    Wilkinson, Paul
    Woodward, Alistair
    Li, Jing
    Gu, Shaohua
    Liu, Xiaobo
    Wu, Haixia
    Wang, Jun
    Song, Xiaoqin
    Zhai, Yunkai
    Zhao, Jie
    Liu, Qiyong
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 627 : 388 - 402
  • [26] Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Technical Efficiency in Alberta Dairy Production: What Are the Trade-Offs?
    Le, Stephanie
    Jeffrey, Scott
    An, Henry
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 52 (02) : 177 - 193
  • [27] Potentials, Limitations, Co-Benefits, and Trade-Offs of Biochar Applications to Soils for Climate Change Mitigation
    Tisserant, Alexandre
    Cherubini, Francesco
    LAND, 2019, 8 (12)
  • [28] Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Human Health Trade-Offs of Organic Waste Management Strategies
    Nordahl, Sarah L.
    Devkota, Jay P.
    Amirebrahimi, Jahon
    Smith, Sarah Josephine
    Breunig, Hanna M.
    Preble, Chelsea, V
    Satchwell, Andrew J.
    Jin, Ling
    Brown, Nancy J.
    Kirchstetter, Thomas W.
    Scown, Corinne D.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (15) : 9200 - 9209
  • [29] Applied smouldering for co-waste management: Benefits and trade-offs
    Rashwan, Tarek L.
    Fournie, Taryn
    Green, Megan
    Duchesne, Alexandra L.
    Brown, Joshua K.
    Grant, Gavin P.
    Torero, Jose L.
    Gerhard, Jason, I
    FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 240
  • [30] Integrated crop-livestock-bioenergy system brings co-benefits and trade-offs in mitigating the environmental impacts of Chinese agriculture
    Xing, Jiahao
    Song, Junnian
    Liu, Chaoshuo
    Yang, Wei
    Duan, Haiyan
    Yabar, Helmut
    Ren, Jingzheng
    NATURE FOOD, 2022, 3 (12): : 1052 - 1064