An overview of environmental co-benefits and trade-offs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in municipal wastewater management

被引:5
|
作者
Zheng, Xinyu [1 ]
Lam, Ka Leung [2 ]
机构
[1] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Environm Sci & Engn, Suzhou 215009, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Duke Kunshan Univ, Div Nat & Appl Sci, 8 Duke Ave, Kunshan 215316, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Wastewater treatment; Greenhouse gas emissions reduction; Life cycle assessment; Environmental impact; Environmental performance; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; TREATMENT PLANTS; FOOD WASTE; PHOSPHORUS RECOVERY; ENERGY NEUTRALITY; SYSTEMS; ALTERNATIVES; RECLAMATION; DIGESTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2024.02.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many opportunities are available to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with municipal wastewater management. The vision of low -carbon or carbon -neutral operation of wastewater treatment plants is emerging. Is the vision of low -carbon wastewater management consistent with improving environmental performances? Here, we explored this question using wastewater management life cycle assessment studies that had scenarios with GHG emissions reduction through alternative wastewater treatment options, sludge treatment options, and resource recovery options. Among these options that contribute to GHG emissions reduction, integrating resource recovery (i.e., water, biogas, phosphorus) appears to have greater chances of co -benefits (especially on acidification, eutrophication, and photochemical oxidant formation). In contrast, shifting sludge disposal practices require more attention to their potential trade-offs (especially on eutrophication and toxicity). It is evident that achieving GHG emissions reduction oftentimes involves compromising on other environmental performances. While more GHG emissions reduction and environmental co -benefits can be seen in most of the scenarios and impact categories (over 75% combining), achieving GHG emissions reduction can still lead to deteriorating of at least one of the environmental impact categories in over half of all the scenarios. Instead of exclusively focusing only on GHG emissions mitigation, abatement strategies from municipal wastewater management systems should also consider harnessing environmental co -benefits and alleviating unintended environmental trade-offs. Identifying the potential contributing factors behind environmental trade-offs can also represent opportunities for optimizing the design and operation of these GHG emissions reduction options. Into the future, wastewater management needs to adopt a broader systems perspective considering the wider system boundary and environmental scope.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Smart cities and sustainable development goals (SDGs): A systematic literature review of co-benefits and trade-offs
    Sharifi, Ayyoob
    Allam, Zaheer
    Bibri, Simon Elias
    Khavarian-Garmsir, Amir Reza
    CITIES, 2024, 146
  • [32] Sustainable Diet Studies Show Co-Benefits for Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Public Health
    Aleksandrowicz, Lukasz
    Haines, Andy
    Green, Rosemary
    ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2015, 6 (03) : 282 - 283
  • [33] Co-benefits and trade-offs of agroforestry for climate change mitigation and other sustainability goals in West Africa
    Tschora, Heloise
    Cherubini, Francesco
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 22
  • [34] Agricultural productivity and greenhouse gas emissions: trade-offs or synergies between mitigation and food security?
    Valin, H.
    Havlik, P.
    Mosnier, A.
    Herrero, M.
    Schmid, E.
    Obersteiner, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (03):
  • [35] Potential Co-benefits and trade-offs between improved soil management, climate change mitigation and agri-food productivity
    McGuire, Ryan
    Williams, Paul N.
    Smith, Pete
    McGrath, Steve P.
    Curry, Donald
    Donnison, Iain
    Emmet, Bridget
    Scollan, Nigel
    FOOD AND ENERGY SECURITY, 2022, 11 (02):
  • [36] Trade-offs between high yields and greenhouse gas emissions in irrigation wheat cropland in China
    Cui, Z. L.
    Wu, L.
    Ye, Y. L.
    Ma, W. Q.
    Chen, X. P.
    Zhang, F. S.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2014, 11 (08) : 2287 - 2294
  • [37] Compliance by Design: Influence of Acceleration Trade-offs on CO2 Emissions and Costs of Fuel Economy and Greenhouse Gas Regulations
    Whitefoot, Kate S.
    Fowlie, Meredith L.
    Skerlos, Steven J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (18) : 10307 - 10315
  • [38] Multi-objective Optimisation Framework for Assessment of Trade-Offs between Benefits and Co-benefits of Nature-based Solutions
    Yang, Shengnan
    Ruangpan, Laddaporn
    Torres, Arlex Sanchez
    Vojinovic, Zoran
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2023, 37 (6-7) : 2325 - 2345
  • [39] Multi-objective Optimisation Framework for Assessment of Trade-Offs between Benefits and Co-benefits of Nature-based Solutions
    Shengnan Yang
    Laddaporn Ruangpan
    Arlex Sanchez Torres
    Zoran Vojinovic
    Water Resources Management, 2023, 37 : 2325 - 2345
  • [40] Quantifying Co-Benefits and Trade-Offs between Forest Ecosystem Services in the Gan River Basin of South China
    Dai, Erfu
    Wang, Xiaoli
    Zhu, Jianjia
    Tian, Qing
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (14)