Potentials, Limitations, Co-Benefits, and Trade-Offs of Biochar Applications to Soils for Climate Change Mitigation

被引:88
|
作者
Tisserant, Alexandre [1 ]
Cherubini, Francesco [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Energy & Proc Engn, Ind Ecol Programme, NO-7034 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
biochar; pyrolysis; food security; climate mitigation; negative emission technology; carbon dioxide removal; life-cycle assessment; environmental assessment; biogeochemical cycles; biophysical effects; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; VOLATILE ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS; BLACK CARBON; AGRICULTURAL SOILS; BIOMASS PYROLYSIS; AMENDED SOILS; RURAL-AREAS; LAND-USE; ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS;
D O I
10.3390/land8120179
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biochar is one of the most affordable negative emission technologies (NET) at hand for future large-scale deployment of carbon dioxide removal (CDR), which is typically found essential to stabilizing global temperature rise at relatively low levels. Biochar has also attracted attention as a soil amendment capable of improving yield and soil quality and of reducing soil greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In this work, we review the literature on biochar production potential and its effects on climate, food security, ecosystems, and toxicity. We identify three key factors that are largely affecting the environmental performance of biochar application to agricultural soils: (1) production condition during pyrolysis, (2) soil conditions and background climate, and (3) field management of biochar. Biochar production using only forest or crop residues can achieve up to 10% of the required CDR for 1.5 degrees C pathways and about 25% for 2 degrees C pathways; the consideration of dedicated crops as biochar feedstocks increases the CDR potential up to 15-35% and 35-50%, respectively. A quantitative review of life-cycle assessment (LCA) studies of biochar systems shows that the total climate change assessment of biochar ranges between a net emission of 0.04 tCO2eq and a net reduction of 1.67 tCO2eq per tonnes feedstock. The wide range of values is due to different assumptions in the LCA studies, such as type of feedstock, biochar stability in soils, soil emissions, substitution effects, and methodological issues. Potential trade-offs between climate mitigation and other environmental impact categories include particulate matter, acidification, and eutrophication and mostly depend on the background energy system considered and on whether residues or dedicated feedstocks are used for biochar production. Overall, our review finds that biochar in soils presents relatively low risks in terms of negative environmental impacts and can improve soil quality and that decisions regarding feedstock mix and pyrolysis conditions can be optimized to maximize climate benefits and to reduce trade-offs under different soil conditions. However, more knowledge on the fate of biochar in freshwater systems and as black carbon emissions is required, as they represent potential negative consequences for climate and toxicity. Biochar systems also interact with the climate through many complex mechanisms (i.e., surface albedo, black carbon emissions from soils, etc.) or with water bodies through leaching of nutrients. These effects are complex and the lack of simplified metrics and approaches prevents their routine inclusion in environmental assessment studies. Specific emission factors produced from more sophisticated climate and ecosystem models are instrumental to increasing the resolution and accuracy of environmental sustainability analysis of biochar systems and can ultimately improve the characterization of the heterogeneities of varying local conditions and combinations of type feedstock, conversion process, soil conditions, and application practice.
引用
收藏
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Co-benefits and trade-offs of climate change mitigation actions and the Sustainable Development Goals
    Cohen, Brett
    Cowie, Annette
    Babiker, Mustafa
    Leip, Adrian
    Smith, Pete
    Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2021, 26 : 805 - 813
  • [2] Co-benefits and trade-offs of climate change mitigation actions and the Sustainable Development Goals
    Cohen, Brett
    Cowie, Annette
    Babiker, Mustafa
    Leip, Adrian
    Smith, Pete
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 26 : 805 - 813
  • [3] Co-benefits and trade-offs of agroforestry for climate change mitigation and other sustainability goals in West Africa
    Tschora, Heloise
    Cherubini, Francesco
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2020, 22
  • [4] Afforestation for climate change mitigation: Potentials, risks and trade-offs
    Doelman, Jonathan C.
    Stehfest, Elke
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    Tabeau, Andrzej
    Hof, Andries F.
    Braakhekke, Maarten C.
    Gernaat, David E. H. J.
    van den Berg, Maarten
    van Zeist, Willem-Jan
    Daioglou, Vassilis
    van Meijl, Hans
    Lucas, Paul L.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2020, 26 (03) : 1576 - 1591
  • [5] Co-benefits and trade-offs of climate change mitigation actions and the Sustainable Development Goals (vol 26, pg 805, 2021)
    Cohen, Brett
    Cowie, Annette
    Babiker, Mustafa
    Leip, Adrian
    Smith, Pete
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2022, 30 : 1096 - 1097
  • [6] Potential Co-benefits and trade-offs between improved soil management, climate change mitigation and agri-food productivity
    McGuire, Ryan
    Williams, Paul N.
    Smith, Pete
    McGrath, Steve P.
    Curry, Donald
    Donnison, Iain
    Emmet, Bridget
    Scollan, Nigel
    FOOD AND ENERGY SECURITY, 2022, 11 (02):
  • [7] The climate benefits, co-benefits, and trade-offs of green infrastructure: A systematic literature review
    Choi, Changsoon
    Berry, Pam
    Smith, Alison
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 291
  • [8] PM in global climate and air quality policies: Co-benefits and trade-offs
    Van Dingenen, R.
    Van Aardenne, J.
    Dentener, F.
    Marmer, E.
    Vignati, E.
    Russ, P.
    Szabo, L.
    Raes, F.
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 2009, 73 (13) : A1369 - A1369
  • [9] Environmental co-benefits and trade-offs of climate mitigation strategies applied to net-zero-emission neighbourhoods
    Carine Lausselet
    Helge Brattebø
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26 : 2263 - 2277
  • [10] Environmental co-benefits and trade-offs of climate mitigation strategies applied to net-zero-emission neighbourhoods
    Lausselet, Carine
    Brattebo, Helge
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (11): : 2263 - 2277