Predictive Factors for Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients with Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Yang [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoke [1 ]
Liu, Kun [2 ]
Liu, Ruijuan [1 ]
Li, Liangliang [2 ]
Yin, Chaoshan [2 ]
Song, Peixing [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhuhai Hosp, Zhuhai Golden Bay Ctr Hosp, Dept Urol, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Med Univ, Fuyang Hosp, Dept Urol, Fuyang, Peoples R China
关键词
Gleason score upgrading; Prostate cancer; Risk factors; Meta-analysis; PERINEURAL INVASION; GRADING SYSTEM; BIOPSY; RISK; SIZE; CANDIDATES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1159/000528873
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Previous studies have revealed that Gleason score upgrading (GSU) was closely related to an increased biochemical recurrence rate and adverse oncologic outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the predictive factors for GSU following radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: We performed an extensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane in September 2022. In order to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals, a fixed effect or a DerSimonian and Laird random effect was applied. Results: Twenty-six studies included 18,745 PC patients that were available for further analysis. Our results revealed that GSU was significantly correlated with age (summary SMD = 0.13; p = 0.004), prostate volume (PV) (summary SMD = -0.19;p < 0.001), preoperative PSA (p-PSA) (summary SMD = 0.18; p < 0.001), PSA density (PSAD) (summary SMD = 0.40; p < 0.001), number of positive cores (summary SMD = 0.28; p = 0.001), percentage of positive cores (summary SMD = 0.36; p < 0.001), Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) scores (>3/<= 3) (summary OR = 2.27; p = 0.001), clinical T stage (>T2/<= T2) (summary OR = 1.73; p < 0.001), positive surgical margins (PSM) ( summary OR = 2.12; p < 0.001), extraprostatic extension (EPE) (summary OR = 2.73; p < 0.001), pathological T stage (>T2/<= T2) (summary OR = 3.45; p < 0.001), perineural invasion (PNI) (summary OR = 2.40; p = 0.008), and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (summary SMD = 0.50; p < 0.001). However, we found that GSU was not significantly correlated with body mass index (BMI) (summary SMD = -0.02; p = 0.602). Moreover, our sensitivity and subgroup analyses showed that the findings were reliable. Conclusions: Age, PV, p-PSA, PSAD, number of positive cores, percentage of positive cores, PI-RADS score, clinical T stage, PSM, EPE, pathological T stage, PNI, and NLR are independent factors predicting GSU following RP. The findings may be helpful in risk stratification and personalized treatment in PC patients. (c) 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 479
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Concordance between Gleason score of prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens and its predictive factors
    Ariafar, Ali
    Rezaeian, Ali
    Zare, Ali
    Zeighami, Shahryar
    Hosseini, Seyed Hossein
    Nikbakht, Hossein-Ali
    Narouie, Behzad
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2023, 90 (02) : 236 - 243
  • [22] Advancing Age and the Odds of Upgrading and Upstaging at Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer
    Leeman, Jonathan E.
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    D'Amico, Anthony, V
    Tilki, Derya
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (06) : E1116 - E1121
  • [23] Advancing Age and the Odds of Upgrading and Upstaging at Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer
    Leeman, J. E.
    Chen, M. H.
    Huland, H.
    Graefen, M.
    Tilki, D.
    D'Amico, A. V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E469 - E469
  • [24] Predictive Factors of Gleason Score Upgrading in Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Diagnosed by Prostate Biopsy
    Moon, Seung Jin
    Park, Sung Yul
    Lee, Tchun Yong
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (10) : 677 - 682
  • [25] The Proportion of Free PSA and Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
    Visapaa, Harri
    Hotakainen, Kristina
    Lundin, Johan
    Ala-Opas, Martti
    Stenman, Ulf-Hokan
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2010, 84 (04) : 378 - 381
  • [26] Higher Prostate Weight Is Inversely Associated with Gleason Score Upgrading in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
    Reis, Leonardo Oliveira
    Zani, Emerson Luis
    Freitas, Leandro L. L.
    Denardi, Fernandes
    Billis, Athanase
    ADVANCES IN UROLOGY, 2013, 2013
  • [27] Prostate Health Index (phi) and its derivatives predict Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy among patients with low-risk prostate cancer
    Yan, Jia-Qi
    Huang, Da
    Huang, Jing-Yi
    Ruan, Xiao-Hao
    Lin, Xiao-Ling
    Fang, Zu-Jun
    Gao, Yi
    Jiang, Hao-Wen
    Wu, Yi-Shuo
    Na, Rong
    Xu, Dan-Feng
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2022, 24 (04) : 406 - +
  • [28] The relationship between PI-RADS score and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy
    Wei, Y.
    Qu, G. -Y.
    Xu, N.
    Chen, S. -H.
    Lin, T. -T.
    Li, X. -D.
    Xue, X. -Y.
    Zheng, Q. -S.
    Huang, J. -B.
    Cai, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 37 - 37
  • [29] IS SMALL PROSTATE VOLUME AN INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR OF GLEASON SCORE UPGRADING FROM PROSTATE BIOPSY TO RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY?
    Remzi, M.
    Waldert, M.
    Klatte, T.
    Marberger, M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 8 (04) : 276 - 276
  • [30] The Discrepancy between Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score in Patients with Prostate Cancer
    Abedi, Amir Reza
    Basiri, Abbas
    Shakhssalim, Nasser
    Sadri, Ghazal
    Ahadi, Mahsa
    Hojjati, Seyyed Ali
    Sheykhzadeh, Samad
    Askarpour, Sajjad
    Ghiasy, Saleh
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (04) : 395 - 399