Predictive Factors for Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients with Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Wang, Yang [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoke [1 ]
Liu, Kun [2 ]
Liu, Ruijuan [1 ]
Li, Liangliang [2 ]
Yin, Chaoshan [2 ]
Song, Peixing [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhuhai Hosp, Zhuhai Golden Bay Ctr Hosp, Dept Urol, Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Zhuhai, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Med Univ, Fuyang Hosp, Dept Urol, Fuyang, Peoples R China
关键词
Gleason score upgrading; Prostate cancer; Risk factors; Meta-analysis; PERINEURAL INVASION; GRADING SYSTEM; BIOPSY; RISK; SIZE; CANDIDATES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1159/000528873
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Previous studies have revealed that Gleason score upgrading (GSU) was closely related to an increased biochemical recurrence rate and adverse oncologic outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PC). Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to determine the predictive factors for GSU following radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods: We performed an extensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane in September 2022. In order to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals, a fixed effect or a DerSimonian and Laird random effect was applied. Results: Twenty-six studies included 18,745 PC patients that were available for further analysis. Our results revealed that GSU was significantly correlated with age (summary SMD = 0.13; p = 0.004), prostate volume (PV) (summary SMD = -0.19;p < 0.001), preoperative PSA (p-PSA) (summary SMD = 0.18; p < 0.001), PSA density (PSAD) (summary SMD = 0.40; p < 0.001), number of positive cores (summary SMD = 0.28; p = 0.001), percentage of positive cores (summary SMD = 0.36; p < 0.001), Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) scores (>3/<= 3) (summary OR = 2.27; p = 0.001), clinical T stage (>T2/<= T2) (summary OR = 1.73; p < 0.001), positive surgical margins (PSM) ( summary OR = 2.12; p < 0.001), extraprostatic extension (EPE) (summary OR = 2.73; p < 0.001), pathological T stage (>T2/<= T2) (summary OR = 3.45; p < 0.001), perineural invasion (PNI) (summary OR = 2.40; p = 0.008), and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (summary SMD = 0.50; p < 0.001). However, we found that GSU was not significantly correlated with body mass index (BMI) (summary SMD = -0.02; p = 0.602). Moreover, our sensitivity and subgroup analyses showed that the findings were reliable. Conclusions: Age, PV, p-PSA, PSAD, number of positive cores, percentage of positive cores, PI-RADS score, clinical T stage, PSM, EPE, pathological T stage, PNI, and NLR are independent factors predicting GSU following RP. The findings may be helpful in risk stratification and personalized treatment in PC patients. (c) 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 479
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ROLE OF PI-RADS VERSION 2 FOR PREDICTION OF UPGRADING AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE BIOPSY GLEASON SCORE 6
    Wan, Song
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Choi, Young Hyo
    Chung, Hyun Woo
    Lee, Chung Un
    Na, Jun Phil
    Jeon, Hwang Gyun
    Jeong, Byong Chang
    Seo, Seong Il
    Jeon, Seong Soo
    Choi, Han Yong
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E220 - E220
  • [42] EXTERNAL VALIDATION OF THE QUANTITATIVE GLEASON SCORE IN PREDICTING PROSTATE CANCER RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Reese, Adam
    Woldemichael, Elen
    Cooperberg, Matthew
    Nelson, Joel
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E602 - E602
  • [43] DEVELOPMENT AND INTERNAL VALIDATION OF A NOMOGRAM PREDICTING THE PROBABILITY OF PROSTATE CANCER GLEASON SCORE UPGRADING BETWEEN BIOPSY AND RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Klatte, T.
    Waldert, M.
    El-Fadel, A.
    Weibl, P.
    De Martino, M.
    Remzi, M.
    Marberger, M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (06) : 656 - 656
  • [44] Detecting lower in addition to the highest Gleason score prostate cancer on core biopsy and the odds of upgrading at radical prostatectomy.
    Phillips, John G.
    Aizer, Ayal A.
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Hirsch, Michelle S.
    Richie, Jerome P.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Hegde, John
    Loffredo, Marian
    D'Amico, Anthony Victor
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [45] The prognostic impact of downgrading and upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy among men with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer
    Jang, Won Sik
    Koh, Dong Hoon
    Kim, Jongchan
    Lee, Jong Soo
    Chung, Doo Yong
    Ham, Won Sik
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Choi, Young Deuk
    PROSTATE, 2019, 79 (16): : 1805 - 1810
  • [46] Do patients with locally advanced prostate cancer and high Gleason score as negative predictive marker benefit from radical prostatectomy?
    Kuefer, R
    Loeffler, M
    Rubin, MA
    Volkmer, B
    Hautmann, RE
    Gschwend, JE
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 173 - 173
  • [47] Outcome of patients with Gleason score 8 or higher prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy alone
    Mian, BM
    Troncoso, P
    Okihara, K
    Bhadkamkar, V
    Johnston, D
    Reyes, AO
    Babaian, RJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 1675 - 1680
  • [48] Comparing histology between prostate cognitive fusion targeted biopsy and radical prostatectomy: exploring risk factors of Gleason score upgrading in Chinese patients
    Tianyun Zheng
    Huaibin Sun
    Yueqing Tang
    Kaipeng Bi
    Yuan Zeng
    Junyan Wang
    Lei Yan
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2023, 149 : 18029 - 18037
  • [49] The Ability of Prostate Health Index (PHI) to Predict Gleason Score in Patients With Prostate Cancer and Discriminate Patients Between Gleason Score 6 and Gleason Score Higher Than 6-A Study on 320 Patients After Radical Prostatectomy
    Dolejsova, Olga
    Kucera, Radek
    Fuchsova, Radka
    Topolcan, Ondrej
    Svobodova, Hana
    Hes, Ondrej
    Eret, Viktor
    Pecen, Ladislav
    Hora, Milan
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2018, 17 : 1 - 6
  • [50] Comparing histology between prostate cognitive fusion targeted biopsy and radical prostatectomy: exploring risk factors of Gleason score upgrading in Chinese patients
    Zheng, Tianyun
    Sun, Huaibin
    Tang, Yueqing
    Bi, Kaipeng
    Zeng, Yuan
    Wang, Junyan
    Yan, Lei
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 149 (20) : 18023 - 18027