Advancing Age and the Odds of Upgrading and Upstaging at Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer

被引:15
|
作者
Leeman, Jonathan E. [1 ]
Chen, Ming-Hui [2 ]
Huland, Hartwig [3 ]
Graefen, Markus [3 ]
D'Amico, Anthony, V [1 ]
Tilki, Derya [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ Connecticut, Dept Stat, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[3] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin Prostate Canc Ctr, Eppendorf, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Eppendorf, Germany
关键词
Active surveillance; mpMRI; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; CLINICAL PREDICTORS; LOW-RISK; BIOPSY; RADIATION; OUTCOMES; DISEASE; CORES;
D O I
10.1016/j.clgc.2019.07.018
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We aimed to identify a subset of men with Gleason score (GS) 6 prostate cancer who should be recommended for staging by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). In a cohort of 3571 men, older age was associated with upgrading/upstaging at radical prostatectomy among men with a percentage of positive biopsy cores >= 33%. Obtaining a mpMRI in healthy older men with GS6 prostate cancer and >= 33% positive biopsy cores should be considered. Purpose: To identify a subset of men with Gleason score (GS) 6 prostate cancer who are at high risk for upgrading/upstaging who should be recommended for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Patients and Methods: Between 1992 and 2017, a total of 3571 men with GS6 prostate cancer were consecutively treated at a single institution with radical prostatectomy. Logistic regression multivariable analyses to determine the odds of upgrading and upstaging were performed, adjusting for age and year of diagnosis, clinical T category, prostate-specific antigen level, number of biopsy cores, and percentage of positive biopsy cores. Results: Of 3571 men, the disease of 115 (3.22%), 245 (6.86%), and 254 (7.11%) was upgraded, was upstaged, or had positive surgical margins (R1), respectively. Older age at diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of upgrading disease to GS7 or higher, prostatectomy T3/T4, and R1 with adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 1.05 (1.01-1.08; P = .005), 1.02 (1.00-1.05; P = .048), and 1.02 (1.002-1.05; P = .03), respectively. Older age was associated with an increasing proportion of men with disease upgraded to GS7 or higher (T1c: P = .002; T2 or higher: P = .04) or upstaged to pT3/4 or pT2R1 (T1c: P = .02; T2 or higher: P = .02) among men with >= 33% but not < 33% positive biopsy cores. Conclusion: Before initiating active surveillance, performing multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in otherwise healthy older men with GS6 prostate cancer and >= 33% positive biopsy cores should be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:E1116 / E1121
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Advancing Age and the Odds of Upgrading and Upstaging at Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer
    Leeman, J. E.
    Chen, M. H.
    Huland, H.
    Graefen, M.
    Tilki, D.
    D'Amico, A. V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (01): : E469 - E469
  • [2] Advancing age and the risk of adverse pathology at radical prostatectomy in men with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer
    Kim, Daniel
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Tilki, Derya
    D'Amico, Anthony Victor
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (06)
  • [3] Association of Age With Risk of Adverse Pathological Findings at Radical Prostatectomy in Men With Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer
    Kim, Daniel W.
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Tilki, Derya
    D'Amico, Anthony, V
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2020, 3 (04)
  • [4] Detecting lower in addition to the highest Gleason score prostate cancer on core biopsy and the odds of upgrading at radical prostatectomy.
    Phillips, John G.
    Aizer, Ayal A.
    Chen, Ming-Hui
    Hirsch, Michelle S.
    Richie, Jerome P.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Hegde, John
    Loffredo, Marian
    D'Amico, Anthony Victor
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [5] PATHOLOGICAL UPGRADING AND UPSTAGING AT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN JAMAICAN MEN WITH LOW RISK PROSTATE CANCER
    Morrison, Belinda
    Reid, Gareth
    Mayhew, Richard
    Aiken, William
    Hanchard, Barrie
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E852 - E852
  • [6] Upgrading and upstaging in prostate cancer: From prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy
    D'Elia, Carolina
    Cerruto, Maria Angela
    Cioffi, Antonio
    Novella, Giovanni
    Cavalleri, Stefano
    Artibani, Walter
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 2 (06) : 1145 - 1149
  • [7] Pathological upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in Jamaican men with low-risk prostate cancer
    Morrison, Belinda F.
    Aikenb, William D.
    Reid, Gareth
    Mayhew, Richard
    Hanchard, Barrie
    ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2019, 13
  • [8] The prognostic impact of downgrading and upgrading from biopsy to radical prostatectomy among men with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer
    Jang, Won Sik
    Koh, Dong Hoon
    Kim, Jongchan
    Lee, Jong Soo
    Chung, Doo Yong
    Ham, Won Sik
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Choi, Young Deuk
    PROSTATE, 2019, 79 (16): : 1805 - 1810
  • [9] Preoperative 3-Tesla Multiparametric Endorectal MRI Findings and the Odds of Upgrading and Upstaging at Radical Prostatectomy in Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Hegde, J.
    Chen, M.
    Mulkern, R. V.
    Fennessy, F. M.
    Tempany, C. M.
    D'Amico, A. V.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (03): : S359 - S360
  • [10] Factors predicting Gleason score 6 upgrading after radical prostatectomy
    Milonas, Daimantas
    Grybas, Aivaras
    Auskalnis, Stasys
    Gudinaviciene, Inga
    Baltrimavicius, Ruslanas
    Kincius, Marius
    Jievaltas, Mindaugas
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) : 205 - 208