Use of artificial intelligence for cancer clinical trial enrollment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Chow, Ronald [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Midroni, Julie [1 ]
Kaur, Jagdeep [2 ]
Boldt, Gabriel [2 ]
Liu, Geoffrey [1 ]
Eng, Lawson [1 ]
Liu, Fei-Fei [1 ]
Haibe-Kains, Benjamin [1 ]
Lock, Michael [2 ]
Raman, Srinivas [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Temerty Fac Med, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, London Hlth Sci Ctr, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, London Reg Canc Program, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Biomed Engn, Fac Appl Sci & Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Temerty Fac Med, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
来源
关键词
SELECTION; QUALITY; TOOL;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djad013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) for cancer clinical trial enrollment and its predictive accuracy in identifying eligible patients for inclusion in such trials. Methods Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched until June 2022. Articles were included if they reported on AI actively being used in the clinical trial enrollment process. Narrative synthesis was conducted among all extracted data: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. For studies where the 2x2 contingency table could be calculated or supplied by authors, a meta-analysis to calculate summary statistics was conducted using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics curve model. Results Ten articles reporting on more than 50 000 patients in 19 datasets were included. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity exceeded 80% in all but 1 dataset. Positive predictive value exceeded 80% in 5 of 17 datasets. Negative predictive value exceeded 80% in all datasets. Summary sensitivity was 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 70.9% to 97.4%); summary specificity was 99.3% (95% CI = 81.8% to 99.9%). Conclusions AI demonstrated comparable, if not superior, performance to manual screening for patient enrollment into cancer clinical trials. As well, AI is highly efficient, requiring less time and human resources to screen patients. AI should be further investigated and implemented for patient recruitment into cancer clinical trials. Future research should validate the use of AI for clinical trials enrollment in less resource-rich regions and ensure broad inclusion for generalizability to all sexes, ages, and ethnicities.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 374
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Artificial Intelligence in Acute Stroke Care: A Systematic Review Meta-Analysis
    Dadoo, Sonali
    Zebrowitz, Elan
    Brabant, Paige
    Uddin, Anaz
    Aifuwa, Esewi
    Maraia, Danielle
    Etienne, Mill
    Yakubov, Neriy
    Babu, Myoungmee
    Babu, Benson
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2024, 96 : S172 - S173
  • [22] SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ESOPHAGEAL DISEASES
    Visaggi, P.
    Barberio, B.
    Gregori, D.
    Azzolina, D.
    Martinato, M.
    Hassan, C.
    Sharma, P.
    Savarino, E.
    De Bortoli, N.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2022, 54 : S80 - S81
  • [23] Accuracy of artificial intelligence in caries detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luke, Alexander Maniangat
    Rezallah, Nader Nabil Fouad
    HEAD & FACE MEDICINE, 2025, 21 (01)
  • [24] Artificial intelligence for MRI stroke detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bojsen, Jonas Asgaard
    Elhakim, Mohammad Talal
    Graumann, Ole
    Gaist, David
    Nielsen, Mads
    Harbo, Frederik Severin Grae
    Krag, Christian Hedeager
    Sagar, Malini Vendela
    Kruuse, Christina
    Boesen, Mikael Ploug
    Rasmussen, Benjamin Schnack Brandt
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01):
  • [25] Artificial Intelligence in Anterior Chamber Evaluation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Olyntho Jr, Marco A. C.
    Jorge, Carlos A. C.
    Castanha, Everton B.
    Goncalves, Andreia N.
    Silva, Barbara L.
    Nogueira, Bernardo V.
    Lima, Geovana M.
    Gracitelli, Carolina P. B.
    Tatham, Andrew J.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2024, 33 (09) : 658 - 664
  • [26] Wearable Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Anxiety: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Abd-alrazaq, Alaa
    Alsaad, Rawan
    Harfouche, Manale
    Aziz, Sarah
    Ahmed, Arfan
    Damseh, Rafat
    Sheikh, Javaid
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [27] Systematic review with meta-analysis: artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of oesophageal diseases
    Visaggi, Pierfrancesco
    Barberio, Brigida
    Gregori, Dario
    Azzolina, Danila
    Martinato, Matteo
    Hassan, Cesare
    Sharma, Prateek
    Savarino, Edoardo
    Bortoli, Nicola
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2022, 55 (05) : 528 - 540
  • [28] Applications of artificial intelligence in Orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Geda, M. W.
    Tang, Yuk Ming
    Lee, C. K. M.
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 133
  • [29] Artificial Intelligence for Detecting Cephalometric Landmarks: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Germana de Queiroz Tavares Borges Mesquita
    Walbert A. Vieira
    Maria Tereza Campos Vidigal
    Bruno Augusto Nassif Travençolo
    Thiago Leite Beaini
    Rubens Spin-Neto
    Luiz Renato Paranhos
    Rui Barbosa de Brito Júnior
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2023, 36 : 1158 - 1179
  • [30] ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ESOPHAGEAL DISEASES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW WITH META-ANALYSIS
    Visaggi, Pierfrancesco
    Barberio, Brigida
    Gregori, Dario
    Azzolina, Danila
    Martinato, Matteo
    Hassan, Cesare
    Sharma, Prateek
    Savarino, Edoardo
    De Bortoli, Nicola
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 162 (07) : S840 - S840