Use of artificial intelligence for cancer clinical trial enrollment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Chow, Ronald [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Midroni, Julie [1 ]
Kaur, Jagdeep [2 ]
Boldt, Gabriel [2 ]
Liu, Geoffrey [1 ]
Eng, Lawson [1 ]
Liu, Fei-Fei [1 ]
Haibe-Kains, Benjamin [1 ]
Lock, Michael [2 ]
Raman, Srinivas [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Temerty Fac Med, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, London Hlth Sci Ctr, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, London Reg Canc Program, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Inst Biomed Engn, Fac Appl Sci & Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Temerty Fac Med, Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON M5G 2C1, Canada
来源
关键词
SELECTION; QUALITY; TOOL;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djad013
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) for cancer clinical trial enrollment and its predictive accuracy in identifying eligible patients for inclusion in such trials. Methods Databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched until June 2022. Articles were included if they reported on AI actively being used in the clinical trial enrollment process. Narrative synthesis was conducted among all extracted data: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. For studies where the 2x2 contingency table could be calculated or supplied by authors, a meta-analysis to calculate summary statistics was conducted using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics curve model. Results Ten articles reporting on more than 50 000 patients in 19 datasets were included. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity exceeded 80% in all but 1 dataset. Positive predictive value exceeded 80% in 5 of 17 datasets. Negative predictive value exceeded 80% in all datasets. Summary sensitivity was 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 70.9% to 97.4%); summary specificity was 99.3% (95% CI = 81.8% to 99.9%). Conclusions AI demonstrated comparable, if not superior, performance to manual screening for patient enrollment into cancer clinical trials. As well, AI is highly efficient, requiring less time and human resources to screen patients. AI should be further investigated and implemented for patient recruitment into cancer clinical trials. Future research should validate the use of AI for clinical trials enrollment in less resource-rich regions and ensure broad inclusion for generalizability to all sexes, ages, and ethnicities.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 374
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Pediatric Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Rokhshad, Rata
    Zhang, Ping
    Mohammad-Rahimi, Hossein
    Shobeiri, Parnian
    Schwendicke, Falk
    PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 46 (01)
  • [42] The efficacy of artificial intelligence in diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abdullah S. Alqahtani
    Wasan M. Alshareef
    Hanan T. Aljadani
    Wesal O. Hawsawi
    Marya H. Shaheen
    International Journal of Retina and Vitreous, 11 (1)
  • [43] Application of artificial intelligence in chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pakanat Decharatanachart
    Roongruedee Chaiteerakij
    Thodsawit Tiyarattanachai
    Sombat Treeprasertsuk
    BMC Gastroenterology, 21
  • [44] Utilizing Artificial Intelligence Among Patients With Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Alhalafi, Abdullah
    Alqahtani, Saif M.
    Alqarni, Naif A.
    Aljuaid, Amal T.
    Aljaber, Ghade T.
    Alshahrani, Lama M.
    Mushait, Hadeel
    Nandi, Partha A.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [45] Artificial intelligence for polyp detection during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Barua, Ishita
    Vinsard, Daniela Guerrero
    Jodal, Henriette C.
    Loberg, Magnus
    Kalager, Mette
    Holme, Oyvind
    Misawa, Masashi
    Bretthauer, Michael
    Mori, Yuichi
    ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 53 (03) : 277 - 284
  • [46] Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fardin Nabizadeh
    Elham Ramezannezhad
    Amirhosein Kargar
    Amir Mohammad Sharafi
    Ali Ghaderi
    Neurological Sciences, 2023, 44 : 499 - 517
  • [47] ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PLATFORMS IN DENTAL CARIES DETECTION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Abbott, Lyndon p
    Saikia, Ankita
    Anthonappa, Robert p
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED DENTAL PRACTICE, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [48] Application of artificial intelligence in chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Decharatanachart, Pakanat
    Chaiteerakij, Roongruedee
    Tiyarattanachai, Thodsawit
    Treeprasertsuk, Sombat
    BMC GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [49] Performances of artificial intelligence in detecting pathologic myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yue
    Li, Yilin
    Liu, Jing
    Wang, Jianing
    Li, Hui
    Zhang, Jinrong
    Yu, Xiaobing
    EYE, 2023, 37 (17) : 3565 - 3573
  • [50] Performances of artificial intelligence in detecting pathologic myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yue Zhang
    Yilin Li
    Jing Liu
    Jianing Wang
    Hui Li
    Jinrong Zhang
    Xiaobing Yu
    Eye, 2023, 37 : 3565 - 3573