Comparison of the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation: a parallel randomized clinical trial

被引:1
|
作者
Nasrolahzadeh, Shahram [1 ]
Nourian, Javad [2 ]
Khosravi, Ahmad [3 ]
Ghasempour, Saeed [4 ]
Abbasi, Ali [5 ]
Ebrahimi, Hossein [6 ]
机构
[1] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Imam Hossein Hosp, Shahroud, Iran
[2] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Imam Hossein Hosp, Clin Res Dev Unit, Shahroud, Iran
[3] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Ctr Hlth Related Social & Behav Sci Res, Dept Epidemiol, Shahroud, Iran
[4] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Shahroud, Iran
[5] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Nursing, Shahroud, Iran
[6] Shahroud Univ Med Sci, Ctr Hlth Related Social & Behav Sci Res, Shahroud, Iran
关键词
Volume control ventilation; Pressure control ventilation; Endotracheal tube cuff pressure; Mechanical ventilation; TIDAL VOLUMES; BODY POSITION;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-023-02263-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are prevalent interventions in the operating room and intensive care unit. Recently, the complications of endotracheal tube cuff pressure have been a topic of interest. Therefore, this study compared the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation modes on the endotracheal cuff pressure rate in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation. Methods In this triple-blinded randomized clinical trial, 50 patients undergoing open limb surgery and inguinal hernia were allocated to two groups of 25 based on inclusion criteria. After intubation, one group underwent ventilation on the pressure control ventilation mode, and the other underwent ventilation on the volume control ventilation mode. In both groups, using a manometer, the cuff's pressure was first adjusted in the range of 25-30 cm of water. Then, the cuff pressure was measured at 10, 20, and 30 min intervals. The data were statistically analyzed using independent t-test, and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Results The present study's findings showed that cuff pressure has significantly decreased over time in both study groups (F = 117.7, P < 0.001). However, a repeated measures ANOVA with a Greenhouse-Geisser correction showed no interaction between time and groups (F = 0.019, P = 0.98). The two groups had no significant difference in cuff pressure (F = 0.56, P = 0.458). Conclusion Since the cuff pressure has been significantly reduced in both groups over time, continuous monitoring of endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation is essential. Therefore, it is suggested to keep the cuff pressure within the recommended range to prevent complications resulting from cuff pressure reduction, such as aspiration and ventilation decrease. Trial registration The study was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trial on 23/02/2019 (trial registration number: IRCT20181018041376N1).
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of the effect of pressure control and volume control ventilation on endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients undergoing general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation: a parallel randomized clinical trial
    Shahram Nasrolahzadeh
    Javad Nourian
    Ahmad Khosravi
    Saeed Ghasempour
    Ali Abbasi
    Hossein Ebrahimi
    BMC Anesthesiology, 23
  • [2] Comparison of pressure-regulated volume control ventilation and pressure control ventilation in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome
    Yin, Jiangtao
    Pan, Xin
    Jia, Jue
    Sun, Shuangshuang
    Wan, Bing
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2019, 17 (03) : 1952 - 1958
  • [3] Comment on intermittent versus continuous control of tracheal cuff pressure in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation
    Chen, I-Wen
    Lin, Hsiu-Jung
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024, 33 (05) : 1995 - 1996
  • [4] Pressure control ventilation vs. volume control ventilation in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery
    Novotny, Z.
    Kovac, N.
    Letica, R.
    Kos, T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (01) : 94 - 95
  • [5] Comparison of Pressure Control Ventilation and Palpation Methods to Protect the Endotracheal Tube Cuff During Tracheotomy: A Manikin Simulation Study
    Kojima, Yuki
    Murouchi, Takeshi
    Asano, Kazuma
    Hirabayashi, Kazuya
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [6] Intracranial Pressure During Pressure Control and Pressure-Regulated Volume Control Ventilation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Crossover trial
    Schirmer-Mikalsen, Kari
    Vik, Anne
    Skogvoll, Eirik
    Moen, Kent Goran
    Solheim, Ole
    Klepstad, Pal
    NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2016, 24 (03) : 332 - 341
  • [7] Intracranial Pressure During Pressure Control and Pressure-Regulated Volume Control Ventilation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Crossover trial
    Kari Schirmer-Mikalsen
    Anne Vik
    Eirik Skogvoll
    Kent Gøran Moen
    Ole Solheim
    Pål Klepstad
    Neurocritical Care, 2016, 24 : 332 - 341
  • [8] Use of pressure volume loop closure to check for endotracheal tube cuff function Randomized clinical trial
    Kaki, Abdullah M.
    Almarakbi, Waleed A.
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (11) : 1185 - 1189
  • [9] A randomized control trial comparing adaptive support ventilation with pressure-regulated volume control ventilation in weaning patients after cardiac surgery
    P Gruber
    C Gomersall
    P Leung
    G Joynt
    S Ng
    M Underwood
    Critical Care, 12 (Suppl 2):
  • [10] Comparison of volume control and pressure control ventilation: Is flow waveform the differences
    Davis, K
    Branson, RD
    Campbell, RS
    Porembka, DT
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1996, 41 (05): : 808 - 814