Clinical outcome measures in the assessment of impact of pharmacists in cardiology ambulatory care: A systematic review

被引:4
|
作者
Livori, Adam C. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Prosser, Adaire [3 ]
Levkovich, Bianca [2 ]
机构
[1] Ballarat Hlth Serv, Ballarat, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Flinders Med Ctr, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[4] Ballarat Hlth Serv, Pharm Dept, 1 Drummond St Nth, Ballarat, Vic 3350, Australia
来源
关键词
NATIONAL HEART FOUNDATION; NEW-ZEALAND; CARDIAC SOCIETY; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; MANAGEMENT; AUSTRALIA; INTERVENTION; GUIDELINES; SERVICES; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.09.018
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aims: Pharmacists are involved in the care of patients with cardiac disease within the ambulatory setting across multiple modes of delivery and practice settings. There is a lack of consensus surrounding the assessments used to measure the impact of pharmacist care. This heterogeneity may undermine confidence and limit utilisation of pharmacists in cardiology ambulatory care. A systematic review was conducted to understand how pharmacist interventions in cardiology ambulatory care were assessed and the impacts of these interventions on patient-centred outcomes.Methods and results: A comprehensive search was conducted of MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Register of Randomised Controlled Trials and EMBASE from 2000 to 2020 with search terms involving pharmacist interventions among cardiology patients in the ambulatory care setting; with studies restricted to randomised controlled trials. Search results were independently screened by two reviewers. The Cochrane Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials tool was used for quality assessment of the included studies. Assessments of pharmacist impact were analysed and compared to established quality indicators of cardiology care. The search produced 3380 individual studies, following screening, 26 studies involving 9013 participants met inclusion criteria. Across the 26 included studies, eleven different inter-vention types were identified. Four main outcome measures assessing the impact of these interventions were identified: direct measure of cardiovascular disease risk factor, major adverse cardiovascular events, medication adherence, validated risk score for cardiovascular events. There was a high degree of variance in both the way these interventions influenced the outcome as well the outcome measures selected to assess the impact of the intervention. Of the 26 studies, sixteen listed positive impacts on primary outcomes and the remaining 10 listed neutral effects.Conclusion: Several outcome measures have been used to assess the impact of pharmacist intervention in cardiology ambulatory care. Aligning outcome measures with known indicators of cardiology care quality, as well as more detailed descriptions of intervention, will provide clinicians vital information in designing effective and measurable interventions in cardiology ambulatory care.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 444
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Heterogeneity of surrogate outcome measures used in critical care studies: A systematic review
    Verghis, Rejina
    Blackwood, Bronagh
    McDowell, Cliona
    Toner, Philip
    Hadfield, Daniel
    Gordon, Anthony C.
    Clarke, Mike
    McAuley, Daniel
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2023, 20 (03) : 307 - 318
  • [42] Diagnosing malignant melanoma in ambulatory care: a systematic review of clinical prediction rules
    Harrington, Emma
    Clyne, Barbara
    Wesseling, Nieneke
    Sandhu, Harkiran
    Armstrong, Laura
    Bennett, Holly
    Fahey, Tom
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (03):
  • [43] Identification and appraisal of outcome measures used to evaluate hypodontia care: A systematic review
    Barber, Sophy
    Bekker, Hilary L.
    Meads, David
    Pavitt, Sue
    Khambay, Balvinder
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2018, 153 (02) : 184 - +
  • [44] DEVELOPING OUTCOME MEASURES FOR AMBULATORY CARE - AN APPLICATION TO ASTHMA AND DIABETES
    MCCOLL, E
    STEEN, IN
    MEADOWS, KA
    HUTCHINSON, A
    ECCLES, MP
    HEWISON, J
    FOWLER, P
    BLADES, SM
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1995, 41 (10) : 1339 - 1348
  • [45] Reimbursement for clinical services provided by ambulatory care pharmacists via telehealth
    Murray, Briana P.
    Watson, Alexandra
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2021, 4 (08): : 959 - 963
  • [46] Insomnia in ambulatory care: A clinical review
    Dopheide, Julie A.
    Roth, Winter R.
    Chu, Michelle K. L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2024,
  • [47] A set of traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcome measures for clinical research: Systematic review and critical examination of outcome measures
    Chung, Pearl
    Khan, Fary
    BRAIN INJURY, 2014, 28 (5-6) : 744 - 744
  • [48] Economic Impact of Ambulatory Clinical Pharmacists in an Advanced Heart Failure Clinic
    Kido, Kazuhiko
    Colvin, Bailey M.
    Broscious, Rachael
    Bongiorni, Sydney
    Sokos, George
    Kamal, Khalid M.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2022, 56 (11) : 1203 - 1209
  • [49] Assessment of spasticity after stroke using clinical measures: a systematic review
    Aloraini, Saleh M.
    Gaverth, Johan
    Yeung, Ellen
    MacKay-Lyons, Marilyn
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 37 (25) : 2313 - 2323
  • [50] Electrophysiological Outcome Measures in Spinal Cord Injury Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
    Korupolu, Radha
    Stampas, Argyrios
    Singh, Mani
    Zhou, Ping
    Francisco, Gerard
    TOPICS IN SPINAL CORD INJURY REHABILITATION, 2019, 25 (04) : 340 - 354