Clinical outcome measures in the assessment of impact of pharmacists in cardiology ambulatory care: A systematic review

被引:4
|
作者
Livori, Adam C. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Prosser, Adaire [3 ]
Levkovich, Bianca [2 ]
机构
[1] Ballarat Hlth Serv, Ballarat, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Flinders Med Ctr, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[4] Ballarat Hlth Serv, Pharm Dept, 1 Drummond St Nth, Ballarat, Vic 3350, Australia
来源
关键词
NATIONAL HEART FOUNDATION; NEW-ZEALAND; CARDIAC SOCIETY; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; MANAGEMENT; AUSTRALIA; INTERVENTION; GUIDELINES; SERVICES; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.09.018
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aims: Pharmacists are involved in the care of patients with cardiac disease within the ambulatory setting across multiple modes of delivery and practice settings. There is a lack of consensus surrounding the assessments used to measure the impact of pharmacist care. This heterogeneity may undermine confidence and limit utilisation of pharmacists in cardiology ambulatory care. A systematic review was conducted to understand how pharmacist interventions in cardiology ambulatory care were assessed and the impacts of these interventions on patient-centred outcomes.Methods and results: A comprehensive search was conducted of MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Register of Randomised Controlled Trials and EMBASE from 2000 to 2020 with search terms involving pharmacist interventions among cardiology patients in the ambulatory care setting; with studies restricted to randomised controlled trials. Search results were independently screened by two reviewers. The Cochrane Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials tool was used for quality assessment of the included studies. Assessments of pharmacist impact were analysed and compared to established quality indicators of cardiology care. The search produced 3380 individual studies, following screening, 26 studies involving 9013 participants met inclusion criteria. Across the 26 included studies, eleven different inter-vention types were identified. Four main outcome measures assessing the impact of these interventions were identified: direct measure of cardiovascular disease risk factor, major adverse cardiovascular events, medication adherence, validated risk score for cardiovascular events. There was a high degree of variance in both the way these interventions influenced the outcome as well the outcome measures selected to assess the impact of the intervention. Of the 26 studies, sixteen listed positive impacts on primary outcomes and the remaining 10 listed neutral effects.Conclusion: Several outcome measures have been used to assess the impact of pharmacist intervention in cardiology ambulatory care. Aligning outcome measures with known indicators of cardiology care quality, as well as more detailed descriptions of intervention, will provide clinicians vital information in designing effective and measurable interventions in cardiology ambulatory care.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 444
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Composite outcome measures in high-impact critical care randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
    Walker, Humphrey G. M.
    Brown, Alastair J.
    Vaz, Ines P.
    Reed, Rebecca
    Schofield, Max A.
    Shao, Jeffrey
    Nanjayya, Vinodh B.
    Udy, Andrew A.
    Jeffcote, Toby
    CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 28 (01)
  • [22] The use of two common palliative outcome measures in clinical care and research: A systematic review of POS and STAS
    Bausewein, C.
    Le Grice, C.
    Simon, S. T.
    Higginson, I. J.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2011, 25 (04) : 304 - 313
  • [23] The association between level of trauma care and clinical outcome measures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Van Ditshuizen, Jan C.
    Van den Driessche, Claire R. L.
    Sewalt, Charlie A.
    Van Lieshout, Esther M. M.
    Verhofstad, Michiel H. J.
    Den Hartog, Dennis
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2020, 89 (04): : 801 - 812
  • [24] Assessment of outcome in clinical trials of gouta review of current measures
    Taylor, W. J.
    Schumacher, H. R., Jr.
    Singh, J. A.
    Grainger, R.
    Dalbeth, N.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (12) : 1751 - 1756
  • [25] Outcome Measures in Critical Care Nutrition Interventional Trials: A Systematic Review
    Chapple, Lee-anne S.
    Summers, Matthew J.
    Weinel, Luke M.
    Deane, Adam M.
    NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 35 (03) : 506 - 513
  • [26] Efficacy of different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis: a systematic review
    Adya Parmar
    P. Prashanth Prabhu
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2023, 280 : 985 - 1004
  • [27] Efficacy of different clinical assessment measures of hyperacusis: a systematic review
    Parmar, Adya
    Prabhu, P. Prashanth
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2023, 280 (03) : 985 - 1004
  • [28] Outcome Measures Used in Clinical Trials for Behcet Syndrome: A Systematic Review
    Hatemi, Gulen
    Merkel, Peter A.
    Hamuryudan, Vedat
    Boers, Maarten
    Direskeneli, Haner
    Aydin, Sibel Z.
    Yazici, Hasan
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2014, 41 (03) : 599 - 612
  • [29] Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Reported in Clinical Canine Osteoarthritis Research
    Belshaw, Zoe
    Asher, Lucy
    Dean, Rachel S.
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 2016, 45 (04) : 480 - 487
  • [30] Outcome measurement in clinical genetics services: A systematic review of validated measures
    Payne, Katherine
    Nicholls, Stuart
    McAllister, Marion
    MacLeod, Rhona
    Donnai, Dian
    Davies, Linda M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008, 11 (03) : 497 - 508