Clinical outcome measures in the assessment of impact of pharmacists in cardiology ambulatory care: A systematic review

被引:4
|
作者
Livori, Adam C. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Prosser, Adaire [3 ]
Levkovich, Bianca [2 ]
机构
[1] Ballarat Hlth Serv, Ballarat, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Flinders Med Ctr, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[4] Ballarat Hlth Serv, Pharm Dept, 1 Drummond St Nth, Ballarat, Vic 3350, Australia
来源
关键词
NATIONAL HEART FOUNDATION; NEW-ZEALAND; CARDIAC SOCIETY; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; MANAGEMENT; AUSTRALIA; INTERVENTION; GUIDELINES; SERVICES; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.09.018
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aims: Pharmacists are involved in the care of patients with cardiac disease within the ambulatory setting across multiple modes of delivery and practice settings. There is a lack of consensus surrounding the assessments used to measure the impact of pharmacist care. This heterogeneity may undermine confidence and limit utilisation of pharmacists in cardiology ambulatory care. A systematic review was conducted to understand how pharmacist interventions in cardiology ambulatory care were assessed and the impacts of these interventions on patient-centred outcomes.Methods and results: A comprehensive search was conducted of MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Register of Randomised Controlled Trials and EMBASE from 2000 to 2020 with search terms involving pharmacist interventions among cardiology patients in the ambulatory care setting; with studies restricted to randomised controlled trials. Search results were independently screened by two reviewers. The Cochrane Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials tool was used for quality assessment of the included studies. Assessments of pharmacist impact were analysed and compared to established quality indicators of cardiology care. The search produced 3380 individual studies, following screening, 26 studies involving 9013 participants met inclusion criteria. Across the 26 included studies, eleven different inter-vention types were identified. Four main outcome measures assessing the impact of these interventions were identified: direct measure of cardiovascular disease risk factor, major adverse cardiovascular events, medication adherence, validated risk score for cardiovascular events. There was a high degree of variance in both the way these interventions influenced the outcome as well the outcome measures selected to assess the impact of the intervention. Of the 26 studies, sixteen listed positive impacts on primary outcomes and the remaining 10 listed neutral effects.Conclusion: Several outcome measures have been used to assess the impact of pharmacist intervention in cardiology ambulatory care. Aligning outcome measures with known indicators of cardiology care quality, as well as more detailed descriptions of intervention, will provide clinicians vital information in designing effective and measurable interventions in cardiology ambulatory care.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 444
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Outcome measurement in clinical genetics services: a systematic review of validated measures
    Payne, Katherine
    Nicholls, S. G.
    McAllister, M.
    MacLeod, R.
    Donnai, D.
    Davies, L. M.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2006, 43 : S62 - S62
  • [32] Systematic review of the impact of health care expenditure on health outcome measures: implications for cost-effectiveness thresholds
    Gloria, Mac Ardy Junio
    Thavorncharoensap, Montarat
    Chaikledkaew, Usa
    Youngkong, Sitaporn
    Thakkinstian, Ammarin
    Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
    Ochalek, Jessica
    Culyer, Anthony J.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (02) : 203 - 215
  • [33] Outcome measures in haemophilia: a systematic review
    Boehlen, Francoise
    Graf, Lukas
    Berntorp, Erik
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY, 2014, 93 : 2 - 15
  • [34] Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: A systematic review of facilitators and barriers
    Antunes, Barbara
    Harding, Richard
    Higginson, Irene J.
    PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 28 (02) : 158 - 175
  • [35] A scoping review of pharmacists' clinical activities and impact on the care of patients with multiple myeloma
    Park, Ji Won
    Pereira, Taynna Tatiane
    Rotta, Inajara
    Lima, Tacio de Mendonca
    Aguiar, Patricia Melo
    Visacri, Marilia Berlofa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2024, 46 (06) : 1281 - 1293
  • [36] Impact of health literacy on health outcomes in ambulatory care patients: A systematic review
    Keller, Darcie L.
    Wright, Julie
    Pace, Heather A.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2008, 42 (09) : 1272 - 1281
  • [37] Impact of integrating pharmacists into primary care teams on health systems indicators: a systematic review
    Hayhoe, Benedict
    Cespedes, Jose Acuyo
    Foley, Kimberley
    Majeed, Azeem
    Ruzangi, Judith
    Greenfield, Geva
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 69 (687): : E665 - E674
  • [38] THE CLINICAL IMPACT OF ELECTRONIC PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES IN REMOTELY MONITORING INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Arumalla, Nikita
    Adas, Maryam
    Chan, Chun K. D.
    Gibson, Mark
    Man, Yik L.
    Norton, Sam
    Galloway, James
    Garrood, Toby
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2023, 62
  • [39] Impact of pharmacist-led interventions on patient care in ambulatory care settings: A systematic review
    Bou Malham, Carmela
    El Khatib, Sarah
    Cestac, Philippe
    Andrieu, Sandrine
    Rouch, Laure
    Salameh, Pascale
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 75 (11)
  • [40] Impact of Clinical Outcome Measures on Placebo Response Rates in Clinical Trials for Chronic Constipation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chen, Jie
    Liu, Xinghuang
    Bai, Tao
    Hou, Xiaohua
    CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 11 : e00255