Clinical outcome measures in the assessment of impact of pharmacists in cardiology ambulatory care: A systematic review

被引:4
|
作者
Livori, Adam C. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Prosser, Adaire [3 ]
Levkovich, Bianca [2 ]
机构
[1] Ballarat Hlth Serv, Ballarat, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Flinders Med Ctr, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[4] Ballarat Hlth Serv, Pharm Dept, 1 Drummond St Nth, Ballarat, Vic 3350, Australia
来源
关键词
NATIONAL HEART FOUNDATION; NEW-ZEALAND; CARDIAC SOCIETY; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; MANAGEMENT; AUSTRALIA; INTERVENTION; GUIDELINES; SERVICES; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.09.018
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aims: Pharmacists are involved in the care of patients with cardiac disease within the ambulatory setting across multiple modes of delivery and practice settings. There is a lack of consensus surrounding the assessments used to measure the impact of pharmacist care. This heterogeneity may undermine confidence and limit utilisation of pharmacists in cardiology ambulatory care. A systematic review was conducted to understand how pharmacist interventions in cardiology ambulatory care were assessed and the impacts of these interventions on patient-centred outcomes.Methods and results: A comprehensive search was conducted of MEDLINE, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Register of Randomised Controlled Trials and EMBASE from 2000 to 2020 with search terms involving pharmacist interventions among cardiology patients in the ambulatory care setting; with studies restricted to randomised controlled trials. Search results were independently screened by two reviewers. The Cochrane Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials tool was used for quality assessment of the included studies. Assessments of pharmacist impact were analysed and compared to established quality indicators of cardiology care. The search produced 3380 individual studies, following screening, 26 studies involving 9013 participants met inclusion criteria. Across the 26 included studies, eleven different inter-vention types were identified. Four main outcome measures assessing the impact of these interventions were identified: direct measure of cardiovascular disease risk factor, major adverse cardiovascular events, medication adherence, validated risk score for cardiovascular events. There was a high degree of variance in both the way these interventions influenced the outcome as well the outcome measures selected to assess the impact of the intervention. Of the 26 studies, sixteen listed positive impacts on primary outcomes and the remaining 10 listed neutral effects.Conclusion: Several outcome measures have been used to assess the impact of pharmacist intervention in cardiology ambulatory care. Aligning outcome measures with known indicators of cardiology care quality, as well as more detailed descriptions of intervention, will provide clinicians vital information in designing effective and measurable interventions in cardiology ambulatory care.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 444
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Diabetes Care by Pharmacists as Part of Health Care Team in Ambulatory Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Fazel, Maryam T.
    Bagalagel, Alaa
    Lee, Jeannie K.
    Martin, Jennifer R.
    Slack, Marion K.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2017, 51 (10) : 890 - 907
  • [2] Clinical pharmacists and inpatient medical care - A systematic review
    Kaboli, Peter J.
    Hoth, Angela B.
    McClimon, Brad J.
    Schnipper, Jeffrey L.
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 166 (09) : 955 - 964
  • [3] Salary survey of ambulatory care clinical pharmacists
    Anastasio, GD
    Shaughnessy, AF
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 1997, 17 (03): : 565 - 568
  • [4] Impact of professional continuous glucose monitoring by clinical pharmacists in an ambulatory care setting
    Van Dril, Elizabeth
    Schumacher, Christie
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2019, 2 (06): : 638 - 644
  • [5] The value of ambulatory care measures: A review of clinical and financial impact from an employer/payer perspective
    de Brantes, Francois
    Wickland, Paula S.
    Williams, John P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2008, 14 (06): : 360 - 368
  • [6] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Routine Pediatric Clinical Care: A Systematic Review
    Bele, Sumedh
    Chugh, Ashton
    Mohamed, Bijan
    Teela, Lorynn
    Haverman, Lotte
    Santana, Maria J.
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2020, 8
  • [7] Effect of clinical pharmacists on care in the emergency department: A systematic review
    Cohen, Victor
    Jellinek, Samantha P.
    Hatch, Amie
    Motov, Sergey
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2009, 66 (15) : 1353 - 1361
  • [8] The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review
    Michelle M. Holmes
    George Lewith
    David Newell
    Jonathan Field
    Felicity L. Bishop
    Quality of Life Research, 2017, 26 : 245 - 257
  • [9] The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review
    Holmes, Michelle M.
    Lewith, George
    Newell, David
    Field, Jonathan
    Bishop, Felicity L.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (02) : 245 - 257
  • [10] Impact of pharmacists providing a prescription review and monitoring service in ambulatory care or community practice
    Tully, MP
    Seston, EM
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2000, 34 (11) : 1320 - 1331