Different femoral tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a finite element analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Bing [1 ,2 ]
Ye, Yongjie [3 ]
Yao, Long [4 ]
Wei, Ancheng [4 ]
Huang, Xin [4 ]
Wang, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Yu, Xiaojun [1 ]
机构
[1] Suining Cent Hosp, Orthoped, 127 Desheng West Rd, Suining 629000, Peoples R China
[2] North Sichuan Med Coll, 234 Fujiang Rd, Nanchong 637100, Peoples R China
[3] Chengdu Fifth Peoples Hosp, Orthoped, 33 Mashi St, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[4] Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, 1166 Liutai Ave, Chengdu 610075, Peoples R China
关键词
Critical corner; Posterior cruciate ligament; Reconstruction; Finite element; Biomechanics; Knee joint injury; CRITICAL CORNER; OUTSIDE-IN; INSIDE-OUT; GRAFT; KNEE; INJURIES; LAXITY; VITRO;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-023-06161-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundAt present, there is no consensus on the optimal biomechanical method for Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, and the "critical corner" that is produced by the femoral tunnel is currently considered to be one of the main reasons for PCL failure. Thus, the purpose of this study was to identify one or several different tunnels of the femur, thereby reducing the influence of the "critical corner" without reducing the posterior stability of the knee.MethodsCT and MRI data of the knee joint of a healthy adult man were collected, and computer-related software was used to reconstruct the finite element model of the knee joint, to provide different properties to different materials and to allow for the performance of a finite element analysis of the reconstructed model. The position of the femoral tunnel was positioned and partitioned according to anatomical posture, and three areas were divided (the antero-proximal region, the antero-distal region and the posterior region). In addition, we applied a posterior tibial load of 134 N to the reconstructed model, recorded and compared different tunnels of the femur, conducted peak stress at the flexion of the knee joint of 0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees and 90 degrees, and elicited the displacement of the proximal tibia.ResultsAmong the 20 different femoral tunnels, the graft peak stress was lower in tunnels 4, 12 and 18 than in the PCL anatomical footpath tunnel 13, especially at high flexion angles (60 degrees and 90 degrees). These three tunnels did not increase the posterior displacement of the proximal tibia compared with the anatomical footpath tunnel 13.ConclusionIn summary, among the options for PCL reconstruction of the femoral tunnel, the tunnels located 5 mm distal to the footprint and 5 mm anterior to the footprint could reduce the peak stress of the graft; additionally, it may reduce the "critical corner" and was shown to not reduce the posterior stability of the knee joint.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Kinematic Analysis of the Indirect Femoral Insertion of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Implications for Anatomic Femoral Tunnel Placement
    Pathare, Neil P.
    Nicholas, Stephen J.
    Colbrunn, Robb
    McHugh, Malachy P.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2014, 30 (11): : 1430 - 1438
  • [42] Where should the femoral tunnel of a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction be placed to best restore anteroposterior laxity and ligament forces?
    Markolf, KL
    Feeley, BT
    Jackson, SR
    McAllister, DR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 34 (04): : 604 - 611
  • [43] Antegrade Tibial Tunnel Technique for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Sherlock, Matthew F. W.
    Otto, David
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (11): : 1301 - 1305
  • [44] Anatomical placement of double femoral tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anteromedial tunnel first or posterolateral tunnel first?
    Shuji Taketomi
    Takumi Nakagawa
    Hideki Takeda
    Kohei Nakajima
    Shuichi Nakayama
    Atsushi Fukai
    Jinso Hirota
    Yoshinori Kachi
    Hirotaka Kawano
    Toshiki Miura
    Naoshi Fukui
    Kozo Nakamura
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2011, 19 : 424 - 431
  • [45] The Use of the 70 degrees Arthroscope for Anatomic Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Placement and Tunnel Viewing in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Bucher, Thomas A.
    Naim, Soulat
    Mandalia, Vipul
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2014, 3 (01): : E79 - E81
  • [46] Anatomical placement of double femoral tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anteromedial tunnel first or posterolateral tunnel first?
    Taketomi, Shuji
    Nakagawa, Takumi
    Takeda, Hideki
    Nakajima, Kohei
    Nakayama, Shuichi
    Fukai, Atsushi
    Hirota, Jinso
    Kachi, Yoshinori
    Kawano, Hirotaka
    Miura, Toshiki
    Fukui, Naoshi
    Nakamura, Kozo
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2011, 19 (03) : 424 - 431
  • [47] Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Lee, Myung Chul
    Seong, Sang Cheol
    Lee, Sahnghoon
    Chang, Chong Bum
    Park, Yoon Keun
    Jo, Hyunchul
    Kim, Choong Hyun
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2007, 23 (07): : 771 - 778
  • [48] Two-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: How bundle tension depends on femoral placement
    Shearn, JT
    Grood, ES
    Noyes, FR
    Levy, MS
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (06): : 1262 - 1270
  • [49] Feasibility and accuracy of robot-assisted tunnel placement in anatomic arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Yang, Gang
    Huang, Hong-Jie
    Shao, Jia-Yi
    Liu, Ding-Ge
    Liu, Kai-Ping
    Zhang, Zhi-Hua
    Wang, Lang-Ran
    Wang, Qi-Ning
    Zhou, Zhi-Hao
    Wang, Jian-Quan
    Zhang, Xin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025, 111 (01) : 1479 - 1483
  • [50] POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT TIBIAL ATTACHMENT ANATOMY AND RADIOGRAPHIC LANDMARKS FOR TIBIAL TUNNEL PLACEMENT IN PCL RECONSTRUCTION
    RACANELLI, JA
    DREZ, D
    ARTHROSCOPY, 1994, 10 (05): : 546 - 549