Kinematic Analysis of the Indirect Femoral Insertion of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Implications for Anatomic Femoral Tunnel Placement

被引:24
|
作者
Pathare, Neil P. [1 ]
Nicholas, Stephen J. [1 ]
Colbrunn, Robb [2 ]
McHugh, Malachy P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Lenox Hill Hosp, Nicholas Inst Sports Med & Athlet Trauma, New York, NY 10075 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Lerner Res Inst, Orthopaed Res Ctr, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
IN-SITU FORCES; POSTEROLATERAL BUNDLES; JOINT KINEMATICS; PATELLAR TENDON; KNEE KINEMATICS; BONE TUNNEL; RECONSTRUCTION; GRAFT; SINGLE; ATTACHMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.017
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To determine the effect of debriding the indirect insertion component of the femoral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) attachment on tibiofemoral kinematics when compared with the intact knee. Methods: Knee kinematics were measured in 9 cadaveric knees with the ACL intact, after indirect insertion debridement, and after ACL transection. Three loading conditions were used: (1) a 134-N anterior tibial load, (2) a combined 10-Nm valgus and 5-Nm internal tibial torque, and (3) a simulated robotic pivot shift. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was recorded in response to anterior and combined loads at 0 degrees, 15 degrees, 30 degrees, 45 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees of flexion. Posterior tibial translation and external tibial rotation were recorded during the simulated pivot shift. Results: With an anterior load, indirect insertion debridement increased ATT by 0.37 +/- 0.24 mm at 0 degrees (P = .002) and by 0.16 +/- 0.19 mm at 15 degrees (P = .033; increases < 1 mm in all specimens). ACL transection increased ATT in response to an anterior load (P = .0001) with maximum effect at 15 degrees compared with the intact and debrided states (11.26 +/- 1.15 mm and 11.04 +/- 1.08 mm, respectively). With a combined load, indirect insertion debridement increased ATT by 0.17 +/- 0.11 mm at 0 degrees (P = .001; increases < 0.3 mm in all specimens) with no effect at other angles. ACL transection increased ATT in response to a combined load (P = .001) with maximum effect at 15 degrees (4.45 +/- 0.85 mm v ACL intact and 4.44 +/- 0.84 mm v debrided indirect insertion). In the ACL intact condition, the pivot shift produced 1.29 +/- 1.34 mm of posterior tibial translation and 1.54 +/- 1.61 degrees of external tibial rotation, as compared with 1.28 +/- 1.34 mm and 1.54 +/- 1.47 degrees, respectively, after debridement (P = .68 and P = .99, respectively) and 12.79 +/- 3.22 mm and 17.60 +/- 4.30 degrees, respectively, after ACL transection (P = .0001). Conclusions: The indirect femoral ACL insertion contributes minimally to restraint of tibial translation and rotation.
引用
收藏
页码:1430 / 1438
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Utilization of Osseous Landmarks for Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Tunnel Placement
    Rowan, Flynn Andrew
    Marshall, Tyler
    Gombosh, Michael R.
    Farrow, Lutul Dashaun
    JOURNAL OF KNEE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (04) : 359 - 363
  • [2] Femoral tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Yu, Joseph
    Garrett, William E.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 14 (01) : 45 - 49
  • [3] Eccentric Femoral Tunnel Widening in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Taketomi, Shuji
    Inui, Hiroshi
    Sanada, Takaki
    Yamagami, Ryota
    Tanaka, Sakae
    Nakagawa, Takumi
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2014, 30 (06): : 701 - 709
  • [4] How Isometric Are the Anatomic Femoral Tunnel and the Anterior Tibial Tunnel for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?
    Lee, Jae-Sung
    Kim, Tae-Ho
    Kang, Soo Yong
    Lee, Sang Hak
    Jung, Young Bok
    Koo, Seungbum
    Chang, Seung-Hwan
    Lee, Won-Bok
    Jung, Ho-Joong
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2012, 28 (10): : 1504 - +
  • [5] The Use of the 70 degrees Arthroscope for Anatomic Femoral and Tibial Tunnel Placement and Tunnel Viewing in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Bucher, Thomas A.
    Naim, Soulat
    Mandalia, Vipul
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2014, 3 (01): : E79 - E81
  • [6] Can Anatomic Femoral Tunnel Placement Be Achieved Using a Transtibial Technique for Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?
    Strauss, Eric J.
    Barker, Joseph U.
    McGill, Kevin
    Cole, Brian J.
    Bach, Bernard R., Jr.
    Verma, Nikhil N.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2011, 39 (06): : 1263 - 1269
  • [7] Use of an endoscopic aimer for femoral tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    McGuire, DA
    Hendricks, SD
    Grinstead, GL
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 1996, 12 (01): : 26 - 31
  • [8] Femoral tunnel placement in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Rue, John-Paul H.
    Ghodadra, Neil
    Bach, Bernard R., Jr.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (01): : 73 - 79
  • [9] Effect of Femoral Tunnel Placement for Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament on Tibial Rotation
    Ristanis, Stavros
    Stergiou, Nicholas
    Siarava, Eleftheria
    Ntoulia, Aikaterini
    Mitsionis, Grigorios
    Georgoulis, Anastasios D.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (09): : 2151 - 2158
  • [10] Anatomic Tunnel Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Dhawan, Aman
    Gallo, Robert A.
    Lynch, Scott A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2016, 24 (07) : 443 - 454