Where should the femoral tunnel of a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction be placed to best restore anteroposterior laxity and ligament forces?

被引:34
|
作者
Markolf, KL [1 ]
Feeley, BT [1 ]
Jackson, SR [1 ]
McAllister, DR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Rehabil Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg,Biomech Res Sect, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2006年 / 34卷 / 04期
关键词
posterior cruciate ligament (PCL); knee ligament biomechanics; PCL reconstruction; PCL graft forces;
D O I
10.1177/0363546505281809
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Objective results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are often less than satisfactory, with many patients exhibiting excessive posterior laxity. Hypothesis: Changes in the position of the femoral tunnel within the posterior cruciate ligament's femoral footprint will significantly affect anteroposterior laxities and graft forces. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: The posterior cruciate ligament's femoral origin was mechanically isolated in 13 fresh-frozen knee specimens, and the bone cap containing the ligament's insertion was attached to a load cell that recorded resultant force during tibial loading tests. Anteroposterior laxity (at +/- 200 N applied force) was also measured. Cast acrylic replicas of the bone cap were fabricated, with tunnels placed in anterolateral, central, and posteromedial regions of the footprint. A graft reconstruction was tested in each tunnel. Results: Mean laxities with the anterolateral tunnel were +0.9 mm to +1.7 mm greater than normal between 0 degrees and 45 degrees of flexion. Mean laxities with the posteromedial tunnel were -2.4 mm to -3.7 mm less than normal between 10 degrees and 45 degrees of flexion. Mean laxities with the central tunnel were not significantly different from intact knee values, except at 0 degrees (0.9 mm greater). Mean graft forces with the anterolateral tunnel were normal for most modes of loading, whereas there were significant increases in graft forces with the posteromedial and central tunnels. Conclusion: The anterolateral tunnel reproduced normal posterior cruciate ligament force profiles but produced a knee that was more lax than normal between 0 degrees and 45 degrees of flexion. The central tunnel best matched intact knee laxities, but graft forces were higher than posterior cruciate ligament forces between 0 degrees and 45 degrees of flexion. The posteromedial tunnel overconstrained anteroposterior laxity approximately 2 to 4 mm between 0 degrees and 45 degrees of flexion and generated higher graft forces in the same flexion range. Clinical Relevance: This study suggests that a posteromedial tunnel should not be used for single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 611
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of femoral tunnel position on graft forces during inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Oakes, DA
    Markolf, KL
    McWilliams, J
    Young, CR
    McAllister, DR
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (05): : 667 - 672
  • [2] Effects of femoral tunnel placement on knee laxity and forces in an anterior cruciate ligament graft
    Markolf, KL
    Hame, S
    Hunter, DM
    Oakes, DA
    Zoric, B
    Gause, P
    Finerman, GAM
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2002, 20 (05) : 1016 - 1024
  • [3] Combined reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament using a single femoral tunnel
    Marcelo Batista Bonadio
    Camilo Partezani Helito
    Noel Oizerovici Foni
    Roberto Freire da Mota e Albuquerque
    José Ricardo Pécora
    Gilberto Luis Camanho
    Marco Kawamura Demange
    Fábio Janson Angelini
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017, 25 : 3024 - 3030
  • [4] Combined reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament using a single femoral tunnel
    Bonadio, Marcelo Batista
    Helito, Camilo Partezani
    Foni, Noel Oizerovici
    da Mota e Albuquerque, Roberto Freire
    Pecora, Jose Ricardo
    Camanho, Gilberto Luis
    Demange, Marco Kawamura
    Angelini, Fabio Janson
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (10) : 3024 - 3030
  • [5] Radiographic analysis of femoral tunnel position in postoperative posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Brand, JC
    Cole, J
    Sumida, K
    Caborn, DNM
    Johnson, DL
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2002, 18 (07): : 688 - 694
  • [6] Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients with Generalized Joint Laxity
    Kim, Sung-Jae
    Chang, Ji-Hoon
    Oh, Kyung-Soo
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (01) : 260 - 266
  • [7] The effect of ketorolac on anteroposterior knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Mehta, V. M.
    Young, E. P.
    Paxton, E. W.
    Fithian, D. C.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2008, 31 (06) : 538 - 540
  • [8] Femoral tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Yu, Joseph
    Garrett, William E.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 14 (01) : 45 - 49
  • [9] Double tunnel technique for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament
    Clancy, WG
    Bisson, LJ
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 1999, 7 (03) : 110 - 117
  • [10] Arthroscopic Transtibial Tunnel Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Fanelli, Gregory C.
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 23 (04) : 289 - 297