Where should the femoral tunnel of a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction be placed to best restore anteroposterior laxity and ligament forces?

被引:34
|
作者
Markolf, KL [1 ]
Feeley, BT [1 ]
Jackson, SR [1 ]
McAllister, DR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Rehabil Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg,Biomech Res Sect, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2006年 / 34卷 / 04期
关键词
posterior cruciate ligament (PCL); knee ligament biomechanics; PCL reconstruction; PCL graft forces;
D O I
10.1177/0363546505281809
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Objective results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are often less than satisfactory, with many patients exhibiting excessive posterior laxity. Hypothesis: Changes in the position of the femoral tunnel within the posterior cruciate ligament's femoral footprint will significantly affect anteroposterior laxities and graft forces. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: The posterior cruciate ligament's femoral origin was mechanically isolated in 13 fresh-frozen knee specimens, and the bone cap containing the ligament's insertion was attached to a load cell that recorded resultant force during tibial loading tests. Anteroposterior laxity (at +/- 200 N applied force) was also measured. Cast acrylic replicas of the bone cap were fabricated, with tunnels placed in anterolateral, central, and posteromedial regions of the footprint. A graft reconstruction was tested in each tunnel. Results: Mean laxities with the anterolateral tunnel were +0.9 mm to +1.7 mm greater than normal between 0 degrees and 45 degrees of flexion. Mean laxities with the posteromedial tunnel were -2.4 mm to -3.7 mm less than normal between 10 degrees and 45 degrees of flexion. Mean laxities with the central tunnel were not significantly different from intact knee values, except at 0 degrees (0.9 mm greater). Mean graft forces with the anterolateral tunnel were normal for most modes of loading, whereas there were significant increases in graft forces with the posteromedial and central tunnels. Conclusion: The anterolateral tunnel reproduced normal posterior cruciate ligament force profiles but produced a knee that was more lax than normal between 0 degrees and 45 degrees of flexion. The central tunnel best matched intact knee laxities, but graft forces were higher than posterior cruciate ligament forces between 0 degrees and 45 degrees of flexion. The posteromedial tunnel overconstrained anteroposterior laxity approximately 2 to 4 mm between 0 degrees and 45 degrees of flexion and generated higher graft forces in the same flexion range. Clinical Relevance: This study suggests that a posteromedial tunnel should not be used for single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 611
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Positioning of the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: functional anatomical reconstruction
    Jorge, Pedro Baches
    Escudeiro, Diego
    Severino, Nilson Roberto
    Santili, Claudio
    Leite Cury, Ricardo de Paula
    Duarte Junior, Aires
    Betoni Guglielmetti, Luiz Gabriel
    BMJ OPEN SPORT & EXERCISE MEDICINE, 2018, 4 (01):
  • [32] Retrograde Technique for Drilling the Femoral Tunnel in an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Branam, Barton R.
    Hasselfeld, Kimberly A.
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2013, 2 (04): : E395 - E399
  • [33] The Anteromedial Portal for Drilling of the Femoral Tunnel for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Georgoulis, A.
    Tokis, A.
    Bernard, M.
    Paessler, H.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 20 (03) : 228 - 229
  • [34] Ultrasonic Technique for Femoral Tunnel Creation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Mae, Tatsuo
    Tsujii, Akira
    Sato, Seira
    Hirose, Takehito
    Ishibashi, Yasuyuki
    Suzuki, Tomoyuki
    Nakata, Ken
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2023, 12 (08): : E1271 - E1280
  • [35] Eccentric Femoral Tunnel Widening in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Taketomi, Shuji
    Inui, Hiroshi
    Sanada, Takaki
    Yamagami, Ryota
    Tanaka, Sakae
    Nakagawa, Takumi
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2014, 30 (06): : 701 - 709
  • [36] Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an arthroscopic femoral inlay technique
    Fabrizio Margheritini
    Francesco Frascari Diotallevi
    Pier Paolo Mariani
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2011, 19 : 2033 - 2035
  • [37] Biomechanical Analysis of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Aperture Femoral Fixation
    Mutnal, Amar
    Leo, Brian M.
    Vargas, Luis
    Colbrunn, Robb W.
    Butler, Robert S.
    Uribe, John W.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2015, 38 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [38] Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an arthroscopic femoral inlay technique
    Margheritini, Fabrizio
    Diotallevi, Francesco Frascari
    Mariani, Pier Paolo
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2011, 19 (12) : 2033 - 2035
  • [39] Tibial tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review
    J.-D. Nicodeme
    C. Löcherbach
    B. M. Jolles
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2014, 22 : 1556 - 1562
  • [40] A rare complication of tunnel aperture breach in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Wu, Bo
    Li, Jian-hua
    Liang, Xiao-song
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (04) : 1702 - 1703