Where should the femoral tunnel of a posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction be placed to best restore anteroposterior laxity and ligament forces?

被引:34
|
作者
Markolf, KL [1 ]
Feeley, BT [1 ]
Jackson, SR [1 ]
McAllister, DR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Rehabil Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg,Biomech Res Sect, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE | 2006年 / 34卷 / 04期
关键词
posterior cruciate ligament (PCL); knee ligament biomechanics; PCL reconstruction; PCL graft forces;
D O I
10.1177/0363546505281809
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Objective results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction are often less than satisfactory, with many patients exhibiting excessive posterior laxity. Hypothesis: Changes in the position of the femoral tunnel within the posterior cruciate ligament's femoral footprint will significantly affect anteroposterior laxities and graft forces. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: The posterior cruciate ligament's femoral origin was mechanically isolated in 13 fresh-frozen knee specimens, and the bone cap containing the ligament's insertion was attached to a load cell that recorded resultant force during tibial loading tests. Anteroposterior laxity (at +/- 200 N applied force) was also measured. Cast acrylic replicas of the bone cap were fabricated, with tunnels placed in anterolateral, central, and posteromedial regions of the footprint. A graft reconstruction was tested in each tunnel. Results: Mean laxities with the anterolateral tunnel were +0.9 mm to +1.7 mm greater than normal between 0 degrees and 45 degrees of flexion. Mean laxities with the posteromedial tunnel were -2.4 mm to -3.7 mm less than normal between 10 degrees and 45 degrees of flexion. Mean laxities with the central tunnel were not significantly different from intact knee values, except at 0 degrees (0.9 mm greater). Mean graft forces with the anterolateral tunnel were normal for most modes of loading, whereas there were significant increases in graft forces with the posteromedial and central tunnels. Conclusion: The anterolateral tunnel reproduced normal posterior cruciate ligament force profiles but produced a knee that was more lax than normal between 0 degrees and 45 degrees of flexion. The central tunnel best matched intact knee laxities, but graft forces were higher than posterior cruciate ligament forces between 0 degrees and 45 degrees of flexion. The posteromedial tunnel overconstrained anteroposterior laxity approximately 2 to 4 mm between 0 degrees and 45 degrees of flexion and generated higher graft forces in the same flexion range. Clinical Relevance: This study suggests that a posteromedial tunnel should not be used for single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 611
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tibial tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review
    Nicodeme, J. -D.
    Loecherbach, C.
    Jolles, B. M.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2014, 22 (07) : 1556 - 1562
  • [42] Magnetic resonance imaging of tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Mariani, PP
    Adriani, E
    Bellelli, A
    Maresca, G
    ARTHROSCOPY, 1999, 15 (07): : 733 - 740
  • [43] A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques - Graft pretension and knee laxity
    McAllister, DR
    Markolf, KL
    Oakes, DA
    Young, CR
    McWilliams, J
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2002, 30 (03): : 312 - 317
  • [44] Avoiding Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Roof Impingement With Transtibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Keys to Correct Tunnel Placement
    Matsumoto, Akio
    Howell, Stephen M.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2005, 20 (03) : 211 - 217
  • [45] The relationship between anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction tibial tunnel location and the anterior aspect of the posterior cruciate ligament insertion
    McGuire, DA
    Hendricks, SD
    Sanders, HM
    ARTHROSCOPY, 1997, 13 (04): : 465 - 473
  • [46] Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation first in anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction best restores knee kinematics
    Zheng, Libin
    Sabzevari, Soheil
    Marshall, Brandon
    Zhu, Junjun
    Linde, Monica A.
    Smolinski, Patrick
    Fu, Freddie H.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2018, 26 (04) : 1237 - 1244
  • [47] Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation first in anterior and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction best restores knee kinematics
    Libin Zheng
    Soheil Sabzevari
    Brandon Marshall
    Junjun Zhu
    Monica A. Linde
    Patrick Smolinski
    Freddie H. Fu
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2018, 26 : 1237 - 1244
  • [48] Influence of the femoral tunnel location and angle on the contact pressure in the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Segawa, H
    Koga, Y
    Omori, G
    Sakamoto, M
    Hara, T
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (03): : 444 - 448
  • [49] Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament and Superficial Medial Collateral Ligament Knee Reconstruction: Avoiding Tunnel Convergence
    Crawford, Matthew D.
    Kennedy, Mitchell I.
    Bernholt, David L.
    DePhillipo, Nicholas N.
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2019, 8 (08): : E929 - E933
  • [50] Anterior cruciate ligament femoral side retained stump technique reduces enlargement of the femoral bone tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Li, Xiaobo
    Li, Hanlin
    Su, Jixian
    Ding, Ran
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)