Treatments and outcomes in high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Albright, Benjamin B. [1 ,3 ]
Ellett, Tressa [2 ]
Knochenhauer, Hope E. [2 ]
Goins, Emily C. [2 ]
Monuszko, Karen A. [2 ]
Kaplan, Samantha J. [2 ]
Previs, Rebecca A. [1 ]
Moss, Haley A. [1 ]
Havrilesky, Laura J. [1 ]
Davidson, Brittany A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, 20 Duke Med Circle,Box 3079, Durham, NC 27710 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
gestational trophoblastic disease; choriocarcinoma; meta-analysis; systematic reviews; ACTINOMYCIN-D; DISEASE; METHOTREXATE; MANAGEMENT; ETOPOSIDE; CHEMOTHERAPY; VINCRISTINE; EXPERIENCE; EMA; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.17374
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundHigh-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is rare and treated with diverse approaches. Limited published institutional data has yet to be systematically reviewed. ObjectivesTo compile global high-risk GTN (prognostic score >= 7) cohorts to summarise treatments and outcomes by disease characteristics and primary chemotherapy. Search StrategyMEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane were searched through March 2021. Selection CriteriaFull-text manuscripts reporting mortality among >= 10 high-risk GTN patients. Data Collection and AnalysisBinomial proportions were summed, and random-effects meta-analyses performed. Main ResultsFrom 1137 records, we included 35 studies, representing 20 countries. Among 2276 unique high-risk GTN patients, 99.7% received chemotherapy, 35.8% surgery and 4.9% radiation. Mortality was 10.9% (243/2236; meta-analysis: 10%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7-12%) and likelihood of complete response to primary chemotherapy was 79.7% (1506/1890; meta-analysis: 78%, 95% CI: 74-83%). Across 24 reporting studies, modern preferred chemotherapy (EMA/CO or EMA/EP) was associated with lower mortality (overall: 8.8 versus 9.5%; comparative meta-analysis: 8.1 versus 12.4%, OR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.90%, 14 studies) and higher likelihood of complete response (overall: 76.6 versus 72.8%; comparative meta-analysis: 75.9 versus 60.7%, OR 2.98, 95% CI: 1.06-8.35%, 14 studies), though studies focused on non-preferred regimens reported comparable outcomes. Mortality was increased for ultra-high-risk disease (30 versus 7.5% high-risk; meta-analysis OR 7.44, 95% CI: 4.29-12.9%) and disease following term delivery (20.8 versus 7.3% following molar pregnancy; meta-analysis OR 2.64, 95% CI: 1.10-6.31%). Relapse rate estimates ranged from 3 to 6%. ConclusionsHigh-risk GTN is responsive to several chemotherapy regimens, with EMA/CO or EMA/EP associated with improved outcomes. Mortality is increased in patients with ultra-high-risk, relapsed and post-term pregnancy disease.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 453
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ELEVATED RISK OF METACHRONOUS NEOPLASIA WITH SESSILE SERRATED ADENOMA IN ADDITION TO HIGH-RISK ADENOMA COMPARED TO HIGH-RISK ADENOMA ALONE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF LITERATURE
    Umapathy, Chandraprakash
    Desai, Madhav
    Boregowda, Umesha
    Halim, Nasir
    Sandhu, Sunny
    Theethira, Thimmaiah
    Roytman, Marina
    Wong, Helen
    Saligram, Shreyas
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (06) : S831 - S832
  • [42] High-risk gestational trophoblastic disease: analysis of clinical prognoses
    Wang, PH
    Yuan, CC
    Tseng, JY
    Chao, HT
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 19 (03) : 302 - 304
  • [43] Screening for Pancreatic Cancer in High-Risk individuals: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Signoretti, Marianna
    Del Chiaro, Marco
    Delle Fave, Gianfranco
    Capurso, Gabriele
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S233 - S233
  • [44] Analysis of high-risk prognostic factors in children with neuroblastoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Rong
    Lou, Xu-yan
    Ren, Chang-cheng
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 47 (11) : 4896 - 4898
  • [45] SCREENING FOR PANCREATIC CANCER IN HIGH-RISK INDIVIDUALS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Signoretti, M.
    Zeboni, G.
    Delle Fave, G.
    Capurso, G.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2017, 49 : E77 - E77
  • [46] Sensitivity of the clinical high-risk and familial high-risk approaches for psychotic disorders - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Talukder, Animesh
    Kougianou, Ioanna
    Healy, Colm
    Lang, Ulla
    Kieseppa, Valentina
    Jalbrzikowski, Maria
    O'Hare, Kirstie
    Kelleher, Ian
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 55
  • [47] Gestational dyslipidaemia and adverse birthweight outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, J.
    Moore, D.
    Subramanian, A.
    Cheng, K. K.
    Toulis, K. A.
    Qiu, X.
    Saravanan, P.
    Price, M. J.
    Nirantharakumar, K.
    OBESITY REVIEWS, 2018, 19 (09) : 1256 - 1268
  • [48] Chemotherapy for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors
    Richard, S.
    Baste-Rotllan, N.
    Soares, D. G.
    Selle, F.
    Khalil, A.
    Gligorov, J.
    Avenin, D.
    Provent, S.
    Lotz, J. -P.
    ONCOLOGIE, 2014, 16 (06) : 291 - 299
  • [49] First-line monodrug chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a network meta-analysis
    Fang, Zhou
    Li, Kemin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 13
  • [50] Management of high-risk gestational trophoblastic disease
    Lurain, JR
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 1998, 43 (01) : 44 - 52