Treatments and outcomes in high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Albright, Benjamin B. [1 ,3 ]
Ellett, Tressa [2 ]
Knochenhauer, Hope E. [2 ]
Goins, Emily C. [2 ]
Monuszko, Karen A. [2 ]
Kaplan, Samantha J. [2 ]
Previs, Rebecca A. [1 ]
Moss, Haley A. [1 ]
Havrilesky, Laura J. [1 ]
Davidson, Brittany A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, 20 Duke Med Circle,Box 3079, Durham, NC 27710 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
gestational trophoblastic disease; choriocarcinoma; meta-analysis; systematic reviews; ACTINOMYCIN-D; DISEASE; METHOTREXATE; MANAGEMENT; ETOPOSIDE; CHEMOTHERAPY; VINCRISTINE; EXPERIENCE; EMA; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.17374
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundHigh-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is rare and treated with diverse approaches. Limited published institutional data has yet to be systematically reviewed. ObjectivesTo compile global high-risk GTN (prognostic score >= 7) cohorts to summarise treatments and outcomes by disease characteristics and primary chemotherapy. Search StrategyMEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane were searched through March 2021. Selection CriteriaFull-text manuscripts reporting mortality among >= 10 high-risk GTN patients. Data Collection and AnalysisBinomial proportions were summed, and random-effects meta-analyses performed. Main ResultsFrom 1137 records, we included 35 studies, representing 20 countries. Among 2276 unique high-risk GTN patients, 99.7% received chemotherapy, 35.8% surgery and 4.9% radiation. Mortality was 10.9% (243/2236; meta-analysis: 10%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7-12%) and likelihood of complete response to primary chemotherapy was 79.7% (1506/1890; meta-analysis: 78%, 95% CI: 74-83%). Across 24 reporting studies, modern preferred chemotherapy (EMA/CO or EMA/EP) was associated with lower mortality (overall: 8.8 versus 9.5%; comparative meta-analysis: 8.1 versus 12.4%, OR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.90%, 14 studies) and higher likelihood of complete response (overall: 76.6 versus 72.8%; comparative meta-analysis: 75.9 versus 60.7%, OR 2.98, 95% CI: 1.06-8.35%, 14 studies), though studies focused on non-preferred regimens reported comparable outcomes. Mortality was increased for ultra-high-risk disease (30 versus 7.5% high-risk; meta-analysis OR 7.44, 95% CI: 4.29-12.9%) and disease following term delivery (20.8 versus 7.3% following molar pregnancy; meta-analysis OR 2.64, 95% CI: 1.10-6.31%). Relapse rate estimates ranged from 3 to 6%. ConclusionsHigh-risk GTN is responsive to several chemotherapy regimens, with EMA/CO or EMA/EP associated with improved outcomes. Mortality is increased in patients with ultra-high-risk, relapsed and post-term pregnancy disease.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 453
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Role of Adjuvant Hysterectomy in Management of High-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia
    Fang, Jing
    Wang, Shu
    Han, Xiaobing
    An, Ruifang
    Wang, Weimin
    Xue, Yan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2012, 22 (03) : 509 - 514
  • [22] Importance of Salvage Therapy in the Management of High-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia
    Lurain, John R.
    Schink, Julian C.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 57 (5-6) : 219 - 224
  • [23] Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a meta-analysis evaluating reproductive and obstetrical outcomes after administration of chemotherapy
    Tranoulis, Anastasios
    Georgiou, Dimitra
    Sayasneh, Ahmad
    Tidy, John
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 (06) : 1021 - 1031
  • [24] Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia After Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Normalization Following Molar Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mayfield, Jazmine
    Fleischman, Anna
    Melvin, Jacquetta
    Knittel, Andrea
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (05): : 1226 - 1226
  • [25] Evaluation of efficacy and safety of chemotherapy in the treatment of recurrent or resistant gestational trophoblastic neoplasia A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Luo, Fang
    Li, Li
    Gao, Qing
    Li, Yu-Xia
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (40)
  • [26] Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia After Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Normalization Following Molar Pregnancy A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Albright, Benjamin B.
    Shorter, Jade M.
    Mastroyannis, Spyridon A.
    Ko, Emily M.
    Schreiber, Courtney A.
    Sonalkar, Sarita
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 (01): : 12 - 23
  • [27] Changes in the Management of High-risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia in the National Trophoblastic Disease Center of Hungary
    Fueloep, Vihnos
    Szigetvari, Ivan
    Szepesi, Janos
    Vegh, Gyoergy
    Berkowitz, Ross S.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 59 (5-6) : 227 - 234
  • [28] A meta-analysis of predictive value of blood biomarkers in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Guo, Ying
    Zhang, Taohong
    He, Xinyi
    Xu, Huiqiu
    Wang, Lisha
    Zhou, Weihua
    Gao, Li
    An, Ruifang
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2024, 20 (07) : 381 - 392
  • [29] Breastfeeding and wheeze-related outcomes in high-risk infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Harvey, Soriah M.
    Murphy, Vanessa E.
    Whalen, Olivia M.
    Gibson, Peter G.
    Jensen, Megan E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2021, 113 (06): : 1609 - 1618
  • [30] Challenging prognostic factors for chemotherapy resistance in high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
    Davidson, B.
    Nagel, C.
    King, M.
    Skorpinski, T.
    Kehoe, S.
    Richardson, D.
    Miller, D.
    Lea, J.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 123 (02) : 449 - 449