Treatments and outcomes in high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Albright, Benjamin B. [1 ,3 ]
Ellett, Tressa [2 ]
Knochenhauer, Hope E. [2 ]
Goins, Emily C. [2 ]
Monuszko, Karen A. [2 ]
Kaplan, Samantha J. [2 ]
Previs, Rebecca A. [1 ]
Moss, Haley A. [1 ]
Havrilesky, Laura J. [1 ]
Davidson, Brittany A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med Ctr, 20 Duke Med Circle,Box 3079, Durham, NC 27710 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
gestational trophoblastic disease; choriocarcinoma; meta-analysis; systematic reviews; ACTINOMYCIN-D; DISEASE; METHOTREXATE; MANAGEMENT; ETOPOSIDE; CHEMOTHERAPY; VINCRISTINE; EXPERIENCE; EMA; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.17374
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BackgroundHigh-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is rare and treated with diverse approaches. Limited published institutional data has yet to be systematically reviewed. ObjectivesTo compile global high-risk GTN (prognostic score >= 7) cohorts to summarise treatments and outcomes by disease characteristics and primary chemotherapy. Search StrategyMEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane were searched through March 2021. Selection CriteriaFull-text manuscripts reporting mortality among >= 10 high-risk GTN patients. Data Collection and AnalysisBinomial proportions were summed, and random-effects meta-analyses performed. Main ResultsFrom 1137 records, we included 35 studies, representing 20 countries. Among 2276 unique high-risk GTN patients, 99.7% received chemotherapy, 35.8% surgery and 4.9% radiation. Mortality was 10.9% (243/2236; meta-analysis: 10%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7-12%) and likelihood of complete response to primary chemotherapy was 79.7% (1506/1890; meta-analysis: 78%, 95% CI: 74-83%). Across 24 reporting studies, modern preferred chemotherapy (EMA/CO or EMA/EP) was associated with lower mortality (overall: 8.8 versus 9.5%; comparative meta-analysis: 8.1 versus 12.4%, OR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.90%, 14 studies) and higher likelihood of complete response (overall: 76.6 versus 72.8%; comparative meta-analysis: 75.9 versus 60.7%, OR 2.98, 95% CI: 1.06-8.35%, 14 studies), though studies focused on non-preferred regimens reported comparable outcomes. Mortality was increased for ultra-high-risk disease (30 versus 7.5% high-risk; meta-analysis OR 7.44, 95% CI: 4.29-12.9%) and disease following term delivery (20.8 versus 7.3% following molar pregnancy; meta-analysis OR 2.64, 95% CI: 1.10-6.31%). Relapse rate estimates ranged from 3 to 6%. ConclusionsHigh-risk GTN is responsive to several chemotherapy regimens, with EMA/CO or EMA/EP associated with improved outcomes. Mortality is increased in patients with ultra-high-risk, relapsed and post-term pregnancy disease.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 453
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Importance of salvage therapy in the management of high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN)
    Lurain, J.
    Schink, J.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 : S67 - S68
  • [32] Pregnancy with multiple high-risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yue
    Ding, Weijie
    Wu, Tingting
    Wu, Songtao
    Wang, Hui
    Fawad, Muhammad
    Adane, Akilew Awoke
    Dai, Xiaochen
    Zhu, Xiaoqin
    Xu, Xiaolin
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL HEALTH, 2025, 15
  • [33] Clinical characteristics and outcomes in ultra high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: Experience from an Indian cancer center
    Mondal, D.
    Palo, U.
    Ghosh, J.
    Ganguly, S.
    Roy, S.
    Biswas, B.
    Ghosh, A.
    Chakraborti, B.
    Bhaumik, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) : S824 - S825
  • [34] RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF HIGH-RISK GESTATIONAL TROPHOBLASTIC NEOPLASIA TREATMENT AT A REFERENCE CENTER IN A NORTHEASTERN BRAZILIAN CAPITAL
    Filho, Carlos Soares
    Caires, Inacelli
    Rohr, Lucia
    De Godoy, Enrico
    Ximenes, Maria Eduarda
    Neves, Marina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024, 34 (SUPPL_3) : A333 - A333
  • [35] EMA-CO chemotherapy for high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a clinical analysis of 54 patients
    Lu, W. -G.
    Ye, F.
    Shen, Y. -M.
    Fu, Y. -F.
    Chen, H. -Z.
    Wan, X. -Y.
    Xie, X.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2008, 18 (02) : 357 - 362
  • [36] The impact of telehealth applications on pregnancy outcomes and costs in high-risk pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ozturk, Gizem Gunes
    Akyildiz, Deniz
    Karacam, Zekiye
    JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2024, 30 (04) : 607 - 630
  • [37] Comparing accuracy of high-risk features for detecting advanced neoplasia in pancreatic cystic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Duvvuri, Abhiram
    Bandla, Harikrishna
    Thoguluva, Vivek Chandrasekar
    Dasari, Chandra
    Desai, Madhav
    Nutalapati, Venkat
    Moole, Vishnu
    Anvesh, Narimiti
    Harsh, Patel
    Gress, Frank
    Sharma, Prateek
    Kohli, Divyanshoo Rai
    ANNALS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 34 (05): : 743 - +
  • [38] High-Risk Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia from a Homozygous NLRP7 Mutation
    Kopelman, Zachary A.
    Hope, Erica R.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2021, 37
  • [39] A comparative study of the efficiency and safety of chemotherapy as a therapeutic method for recurrent or resistant gestational trophoblastic neoplasia A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiang, Tian-Yue
    Ren, Jia-Jie
    Zhang, Yang
    Zhao, Yan
    Feng, Xiao-Ling
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (24) : E26263
  • [40] Management of high-risk hydatidiform mole and persistent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia - The Korean experience
    Kim, Seung Jo
    Na, Young Jeong
    Jung, Sang Geun
    Kim, Chan Joo
    Bae, Seog Nyeon
    Lee, Chan
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 52 (09) : 819 - 830