Active Surveillance for Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

被引:0
|
作者
Miceli, Rachel [1 ]
Mercado, Cecilia L. [1 ]
Hernandez, Osvaldo [2 ]
Chhor, Chloe [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Hlth, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU Langone Hlth, Dept Pathol, New York, NY USA
关键词
atypical ductal hyperplasia; ductal carcinoma in situ; invasive ductal carcinoma; active surveillance; de-escalation; CORE-NEEDLE-BIOPSY; VACUUM-ASSISTED BIOPSY; SURGICAL UPSTAGING RATES; BREAST-CANCER MORTALITY; LOW-RISK; NATURAL-HISTORY; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; UPGRADE RATE; FOLLOW-UP; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1093/jbi/wbad026
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are relatively common breast lesions on the same spectrum of disease. Atypical ductal hyperblasia is a nonmalignant, high-risk lesion, and DCIS is a noninvasive malignancy. While a benefit of screening mammography is early cancer detection, it also leads to increased biopsy diagnosis of noninvasive lesions. Previously, treatment guidelines for both entities included surgical excision because of the risk of upgrade to invasive cancer after surgery and risk of progression to invasive cancer for DCIS. However, this universal management approach is not optimal for all patients because most lesions are not upgraded after surgery. Furthermore, some DCIS lesions do not progress to clinically significant invasive cancer. Overtreatment of high-risk lesions and DCIS is considered a burden on patients and clinicians and is a strain on the health care system. Extensive research has identified many potential histologic, clinical, and imaging factors that may predict ADH and DCIS upgrade and thereby help clinicians select which patients should undergo surgery and which may be appropriate for active surveillance (AS) with imaging. Additionally, multiple clinical trials are currently underway to evaluate whether AS for DCIS is feasible for a select group of patients. Recent advances in MRI, artificial intelligence, and molecular markers may also have an important role to play in stratifying patients and delineating best management guidelines. This review article discusses the available evidence regarding the feasibility and limitations of AS for ADH and DCIS, as well as recent advances in patient risk stratification.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 415
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: A Computational Risk Analysis
    Ryser, Marc D.
    Worni, Mathias
    Turner, Elizabeth L.
    Marks, Jeffrey R.
    Durrett, Rick
    Hwang, E. Shelley
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2016, 108 (05):
  • [42] Imaging Features of Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
    Grimm, Lars J.
    Ghate, Sujata V.
    Hwang, E. Shelley
    Soo, Mary Scott
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (11) : 1364 - 1371
  • [43] A retrospective alternative for active surveillance trials for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
    Van Bockstal, Mieke R.
    Agahozo, Marie C.
    Koppert, Linetta B.
    van Deurzen, Carolien H. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 146 (05) : 1189 - 1197
  • [44] ASO Author Reflections: Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)
    Oseni, Tawakalitu O.
    Bahl, Manisha
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (11) : 4466 - 4467
  • [45] Patient and provider views on active surveillance for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
    Newman-Bremang, Jieun
    Nyhof, Bryanna
    Hong, Nicole Look
    Gagliardi, Anna
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 29 (SUPPL 1) : 108 - 109
  • [46] ASO Author Reflections: Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)
    Tawakalitu O. Oseni
    Manisha Bahl
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 4466 - 4467
  • [47] Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Shining Light Into the Modeling Abyss
    Etzioni, Ruth
    Gulati, Roman
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2016, 108 (05):
  • [48] Cancerization of lobules and atypical ductal hyperplasia adjacent to ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast - Significance for breast-conserving therapy
    Goldstein, NS
    Lacerna, M
    Vicini, F
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1998, 110 (03) : 357 - 367
  • [49] Comparison of rate limiting factors in the transformation of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Turbat-Herrera, EA
    Nordberg, ML
    deBenedetti, A
    Lampejo, OT
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2003, 83 (01) : 50A - 50A
  • [50] Atypical ductal hyperplasia is a multipotent precursor of breast carcinoma
    Kader, Tanjina
    Hill, Prue
    Zethoven, Magnus
    Goode, David L.
    Elder, Kenneth
    Thio, Niko
    Doyle, Maria
    Semple, Timothy
    Sufyan, Wajiha
    Byrne, David J.
    Pang, Jia-Min B.
    Murugasu, Anand
    Miligy, Islam M.
    Green, Andrew R.
    Rakha, Emad A.
    Fox, Stephen B.
    Mann, G. Bruce
    Campbell, Ian G.
    Gorringe, Kylie L.
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2019, 248 (03): : 326 - 338