Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: A Computational Risk Analysis

被引:53
|
作者
Ryser, Marc D. [1 ,3 ]
Worni, Mathias [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Turner, Elizabeth L. [2 ,7 ]
Marks, Jeffrey R. [4 ]
Durrett, Rick [1 ]
Hwang, E. Shelley [3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Math, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Global Hlth Inst, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Adv Oncol & GI Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Surg Sci, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[5] Univ Hosp Bern, Inselspital, Dept Visceral Surg & Med, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[6] Univ Bern, Bern, Switzerland
[7] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC 27710 USA
来源
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
BREAST-CANCER; OVERDIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; WOMEN; DCIS; TAMOXIFEN; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djv372
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a noninvasive breast lesion with uncertain risk for invasive progression. Usual care (UC) for DCIS consists of treatment upon diagnosis, thus potentially overtreating patients with low propensity for progression. One strategy to reduce overtreatment is active surveillance (AS), whereby DCIS is treated only upon detection of invasive disease. Our goal was to perform a quantitative evaluation of outcomes following an AS strategy for DCIS. Methods: Age-stratified, 10-year disease-specific cumulative mortality (DSCM) for AS was calculated using a computational risk projection model based upon published estimates for natural history parameters, and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data for outcomes. AS projections were compared with the DSCM for patients who received UC. To quantify the propagation of parameter uncertainty, a 95% projection range (PR) was computed, and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Under the assumption that AS cannot outperform UC, the projected median differences in 10-year DSCM between AS and UC when diagnosed at ages 40, 55, and 70 years were 2.6% (PR = 1.4%-5.1%), 1.5% (PR = 0.5%-3.5%), and 0.6% (PR = 0.0%-2.4), respectively. Corresponding median numbers of patients needed to treat to avert one breast cancer death were 38.3 (PR = 19.7-69.9), 67.3 (PR = 28.7-211.4), and 157.2 (PR = 41.1-3872.8), respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed that the parameter with greatest impact on DSCM was the probability of understaging invasive cancer at diagnosis. Conclusion: AS could be a viable management strategy for carefully selected DCIS patients, particularly among older age groups and those with substantial competing mortality risks. The effectiveness of AS could be markedly improved by reducing the rate of understaging.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of active surveillance as a treatment modality in ductal carcinoma in situ
    Fan, Betty
    Pardo, Jaime A.
    Alapati, Amulya
    Hopewood, Peter
    Virk, Zain Mohammad
    James, Ted A.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (06): : 1221 - 1226
  • [2] Ductal carcinoma in situ: treatment or active surveillance?
    Kuerer, Henry M.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2015, 15 (07) : 777 - 785
  • [3] Active Surveillance for Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    Miceli, Rachel
    Mercado, Cecilia L.
    Hernandez, Osvaldo
    Chhor, Chloe
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2023, 5 (04) : 396 - 415
  • [5] Effects of reproductive risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive ductal carcinoma, and invasive ductal carcinoma with ductal carcinoma in situ on clinical outcomes
    Lee, J.
    Lee, J.
    Oh, M.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [6] Oncological safety of active surveillance for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ — a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Matthew G. Davey
    Aoife J. Lowery
    Michael J. Kerin
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2023, 192 : 1595 - 1600
  • [7] Oncological safety of active surveillance for low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Davey, Matthew G.
    Lowery, Aoife J.
    Kerin, Michael J.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 192 (04) : 1595 - 1600
  • [8] A retrospective alternative for active surveillance trials for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
    Van Bockstal, Mieke R.
    Agahozo, Marie C.
    Koppert, Linetta B.
    van Deurzen, Carolien H. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2020, 146 (05) : 1189 - 1197
  • [9] Imaging Features of Patients Undergoing Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ
    Grimm, Lars J.
    Ghate, Sujata V.
    Hwang, E. Shelley
    Soo, Mary Scott
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (11) : 1364 - 1371
  • [10] ASO Author Reflections: Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)
    Oseni, Tawakalitu O.
    Bahl, Manisha
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (11) : 4466 - 4467