Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: A Computational Risk Analysis

被引:53
|
作者
Ryser, Marc D. [1 ,3 ]
Worni, Mathias [3 ,5 ,6 ]
Turner, Elizabeth L. [2 ,7 ]
Marks, Jeffrey R. [4 ]
Durrett, Rick [1 ]
Hwang, E. Shelley [3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Math, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Global Hlth Inst, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Adv Oncol & GI Surg, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Surg Sci, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[5] Univ Hosp Bern, Inselspital, Dept Visceral Surg & Med, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[6] Univ Bern, Bern, Switzerland
[7] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC 27710 USA
来源
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
BREAST-CANCER; OVERDIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; WOMEN; DCIS; TAMOXIFEN; FEATURES;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djv372
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a noninvasive breast lesion with uncertain risk for invasive progression. Usual care (UC) for DCIS consists of treatment upon diagnosis, thus potentially overtreating patients with low propensity for progression. One strategy to reduce overtreatment is active surveillance (AS), whereby DCIS is treated only upon detection of invasive disease. Our goal was to perform a quantitative evaluation of outcomes following an AS strategy for DCIS. Methods: Age-stratified, 10-year disease-specific cumulative mortality (DSCM) for AS was calculated using a computational risk projection model based upon published estimates for natural history parameters, and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data for outcomes. AS projections were compared with the DSCM for patients who received UC. To quantify the propagation of parameter uncertainty, a 95% projection range (PR) was computed, and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Under the assumption that AS cannot outperform UC, the projected median differences in 10-year DSCM between AS and UC when diagnosed at ages 40, 55, and 70 years were 2.6% (PR = 1.4%-5.1%), 1.5% (PR = 0.5%-3.5%), and 0.6% (PR = 0.0%-2.4), respectively. Corresponding median numbers of patients needed to treat to avert one breast cancer death were 38.3 (PR = 19.7-69.9), 67.3 (PR = 28.7-211.4), and 157.2 (PR = 41.1-3872.8), respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed that the parameter with greatest impact on DSCM was the probability of understaging invasive cancer at diagnosis. Conclusion: AS could be a viable management strategy for carefully selected DCIS patients, particularly among older age groups and those with substantial competing mortality risks. The effectiveness of AS could be markedly improved by reducing the rate of understaging.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative analysis of the immunohistochemical profile of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive ductal carcinoma
    Orozco, J. I. J.
    Gago, F. E.
    Ciocca, D. R.
    Mendiondo, B. S.
    Ciocca, L. A.
    Ibarra, M. J.
    Tello, O. M.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73
  • [42] Outcomes Study of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treated with Excision
    Qian, J.
    Rizki, A.
    Chong, J.
    Richey, J.
    Ticar, J.
    Shan, L.
    Idowu, M.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 60A - 60A
  • [43] Outcomes Study of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treated with Excision
    Qian, J.
    Rizki, A.
    Chong, J.
    Richey, J.
    Ticar, J.
    Shan, L.
    Idowu, M.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2012, 25 : 60A - 60A
  • [44] Patients' attitudes towards active surveillance versus surgery for low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
    Bleiker, Eveline
    Engelhardt, Ellen
    Skinner, Victoria
    Geerts, Christel
    Kuenen, Marianne
    Verschuur, Ellen
    van Oirsouw, Marja
    van Duijnhoven, Frederieke
    Retel, Valesca
    Wesseling, Jelle
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 27 : 97 - 97
  • [45] External validation of the MSKCC nomogram for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ and risk factors analysis
    Oses, G.
    Mension, E.
    Pomarola, C.
    Castillo, H.
    Leon, F.
    Torras, I.
    Cebrecos, I.
    Caparros, X.
    Ganau, S.
    Ubeda, B.
    Bargallo, X.
    Gonzalez-Farre, B.
    Sanfeliu, E.
    Vidal, S.
    Molla, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1024 - S1026
  • [46] Can we select individuals with low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)? A population-based outcomes analysis
    Eileen Rakovitch
    Sharon Nofech-Mozes
    Steven A. Narod
    Wedad Hanna
    Deva Thiruchelvam
    Refik Saskin
    Carole Taylor
    Alan Tuck
    Sandip Sengupta
    Leela Elavathil
    Prashant A. Jani
    Susan J. Done
    Naomi Miller
    Bruce Youngson
    Iwa Kong
    Lawrence Paszat
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2013, 138 : 581 - 590
  • [47] Can we select individuals with low risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)? A population-based outcomes analysis
    Rakovitch, Eileen
    Nofech-Mozes, Sharon
    Narod, Steven A.
    Hanna, Wedad
    Thiruchelvam, Deva
    Saskin, Refik
    Taylor, Carole
    Tuck, Alan
    Sengupta, Sandip
    Elavathil, Leela
    Jani, Prashant A.
    Done, Susan J.
    Miller, Naomi
    Youngson, Bruce
    Kong, Iwa
    Paszat, Lawrence
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 138 (02) : 581 - 590
  • [48] Oral contraceptives and the risk of ductal breast carcinoma in situ
    Claus, EB
    Stowe, M
    Carter, D
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2003, 81 (02) : 129 - 136
  • [49] Risk of recurrence after ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast
    Habel, LA
    Daling, JR
    Newcomb, PA
    Self, SG
    Porter, PL
    Stanford, JL
    Seidel, K
    Weiss, NS
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 1998, 7 (08) : 689 - 696
  • [50] Oral Contraceptives and the Risk of Ductal Breast Carcinoma in situ
    Elizabeth B. Claus
    Meredith Stowe
    Darryl Carter
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2003, 81 : 129 - 136