Active Surveillance for Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

被引:0
|
作者
Miceli, Rachel [1 ]
Mercado, Cecilia L. [1 ]
Hernandez, Osvaldo [2 ]
Chhor, Chloe [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Hlth, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10016 USA
[2] NYU Langone Hlth, Dept Pathol, New York, NY USA
关键词
atypical ductal hyperplasia; ductal carcinoma in situ; invasive ductal carcinoma; active surveillance; de-escalation; CORE-NEEDLE-BIOPSY; VACUUM-ASSISTED BIOPSY; SURGICAL UPSTAGING RATES; BREAST-CANCER MORTALITY; LOW-RISK; NATURAL-HISTORY; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; UPGRADE RATE; FOLLOW-UP; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1093/jbi/wbad026
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are relatively common breast lesions on the same spectrum of disease. Atypical ductal hyperblasia is a nonmalignant, high-risk lesion, and DCIS is a noninvasive malignancy. While a benefit of screening mammography is early cancer detection, it also leads to increased biopsy diagnosis of noninvasive lesions. Previously, treatment guidelines for both entities included surgical excision because of the risk of upgrade to invasive cancer after surgery and risk of progression to invasive cancer for DCIS. However, this universal management approach is not optimal for all patients because most lesions are not upgraded after surgery. Furthermore, some DCIS lesions do not progress to clinically significant invasive cancer. Overtreatment of high-risk lesions and DCIS is considered a burden on patients and clinicians and is a strain on the health care system. Extensive research has identified many potential histologic, clinical, and imaging factors that may predict ADH and DCIS upgrade and thereby help clinicians select which patients should undergo surgery and which may be appropriate for active surveillance (AS) with imaging. Additionally, multiple clinical trials are currently underway to evaluate whether AS for DCIS is feasible for a select group of patients. Recent advances in MRI, artificial intelligence, and molecular markers may also have an important role to play in stratifying patients and delineating best management guidelines. This review article discusses the available evidence regarding the feasibility and limitations of AS for ADH and DCIS, as well as recent advances in patient risk stratification.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 415
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Chemoprevention Uptake among Women with Atypical Hyperplasia and Lobular and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    Trivedi, Meghna S.
    Coe, Austin M.
    Vanegas, Alejandro
    Kukafka, Rita
    Crew, Katherine D.
    CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH, 2017, 10 (08) : 434 - 441
  • [32] Estrogen Receptor and Cytokeratin 5 Are Reliable Markers to Separate Usual Ductal Hyperplasia From Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Low-Grade Ductal Carcinoma In Situ
    Martinez, Anthony P.
    Cohen, Cynthia
    Hanley, Krisztina Z.
    Li, Xiaoxian
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 140 (07) : 686 - 689
  • [33] The Utilities of Estrogen Receptor, Cytokeratin 5/6, and Cytokeratin 903 to Differentiate Between Usual Ductal Hyperplasia, Flat Epithelial Atypia, Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia, Ductal Carcinoma In Situ, and Lobular Carcinoma In Situ
    Wei, Eric
    Dela Cruz, Nestor
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2018, 149 : S30 - S30
  • [34] Atypical ductal hyperplasia and atypical epithelial proliferation of ductal type
    Boecker, W.
    Hungermann, D.
    Weigel, S.
    Roterberg, K.
    Decker, T.
    PATHOLOGE, 2009, 30 (01): : 42 - 48
  • [35] Borderline Ductal Epithelial Lesions: Interobserver Reproducibility in 43 Cases with Original Diagnosis of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Bordering on Ductal Carcinoma In-Situ
    Tozbikian, G.
    Brogi, E.
    Catalano, J.
    Patil, S.
    Van Zee, K. J.
    Kadivar, M.
    Vallejo, C. E.
    Wen, Y. H.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 : 72A - 72A
  • [36] Preneoplastic Low-Risk Mammary Ductal Lesions (Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia and Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Spectrum): Current Status and Future Directions
    Khoury, Thaer
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [37] Thymidine kinase 1 expression in atypical ductal hyperplasia significantly differs from usual ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ: A useful tool in tumor therapy management
    Guan, Hong
    Sun, Yanhua
    Zan, Qin
    Xu, Meiquan
    Li, Yuan
    Zhou, Ji
    He, Ellen
    Eriksson, Staffan
    Wen, Wen
    Skog, Sven
    MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS, 2009, 2 (06) : 923 - 929
  • [38] Borderline Ductal Epithelial Lesions: Interobserver Reproducibility in 43 Cases with Original Diagnosis of Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Bordering on Ductal Carcinoma In-Situ
    Tozbikian, G.
    Brogi, E.
    Catalano, J.
    Patil, S.
    Van Zee, K. J.
    Kadivar, M.
    Vallejo, C. E.
    Wen, Y. H.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 72A - 72A
  • [39] Comparison of rate limiting factors in the transformation of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast using immunochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization
    Turbat-Herrera, EA
    Nordberg, ML
    deBenedetti, A
    Lampejo, OT
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2003, 16 (01) : 50A - 50A
  • [40] Prospective Analysis Using a Novel CNN Algorithm to Distinguish Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia From Ductal Carcinoma in Situ in Breast
    Mutasa, Simukayi
    Chang, Peter
    Nemer, John
    Van Sant, Eduardo Pascual
    Sun, Mary
    McIlvride, Alison
    Siddique, Maham
    Ha, Richard
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2020, 20 (06) : E757 - E760