Comparison of Various Annual Land Cover Datasets in the Yellow River Basin

被引:8
|
作者
Liu, Bo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Zemin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pan, Libo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sun, Yibo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ji, Shengnan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guan, Xiao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Junsheng [4 ]
Xu, Mingzhu [5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Protect Reg Ecoproc & Funct, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, Inst Ecol, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[4] CGS, Command Ctr Nat Resources Comprehens Survey, Beijing 100055, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Environm Technol Co Ltd, Hangzhou 311100, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
annual land cover datasets; Yellow River Basin; spatial and temporal distribution; error decomposition analysis; landscape heterogeneity; BIG DATA APPLICATIONS; GOOGLE EARTH ENGINE; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; LOESS PLATEAU; AREA; DYNAMICS; MODIS; PRECIPITATION; TEMPERATURE; PIXELS;
D O I
10.3390/rs15102539
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate land cover (LC) datasets are the basis for global environmental and climate change studies. Recently, numerous open-source annual LC datasets have been created due to advances in remote sensing technology. However, the agreements and sources of error that affect the accuracy of current annual LC datasets are not well understood, which limits the widespread use of these datasets. We compared four annual LC datasets, namely the CLCD, MCD12Q1, CCI-LC, and GLASS-LC, in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) to identify their spatial and temporal agreement for nine LC classes and to analyze their sources of error. The Mann-Kendall test, Sen's slope analysis, Taylor diagram, and error decomposition analysis were used in this study. Our results showed that the main LC classes in the four datasets were grassland and cropland (total area percentage > 80%), but their trends in area of change were different. For the main LC classes, the temporal agreement was the highest between the CCI-LC and CLCD (0.85), followed by the MCD12Q1 (0.21), while the lowest was between the GLASS-LC and CLCD (-0.11). The spatial distribution of area for the main LC classes was largely similar between the four datasets, but the spatial agreement in their trends in area of change varied considerably. The spatial variation in the trends in area of change for the cropland, forest, grassland, barren, and impervious LC classes were mainly located in the upstream area region (UA) and the midstream area region (MA) of the YRB, where the percentage of systematic error was high (>68.55%). This indicated that the spatial variation between the four datasets was mainly caused by systematic errors. Between the four datasets, the total error increased along with landscape heterogeneity. These results not only improve our understanding of the spatial and temporal agreement and sources of error between the various current annual LC datasets, but also provide support for land policy making in the YRB.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Spatiotemporal evolution of land cover changes and landscape ecological risk assessment in the Yellow River Basin, 2015-2020
    Du, Lindan
    Dong, Chun
    Kang, Xiaochen
    Qian, Xinglong
    Gu, Lingxiao
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 332
  • [42] Impacts of Climate and Land Use/Cover Change on Water Yield Services in the Upper Yellow River Basin in Maqu County
    Che, Xichen
    Jiao, Liang
    Qin, Huijun
    Wu, Jingjing
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [43] Mapping Land Use/Cover Dynamics of the Yellow River Basin from 1986 to 2018 Supported by Google Earth Engine
    Ji, Qiulei
    Liang, Wei
    Fu, Bojie
    Zhang, Weibin
    Yan, Jianwu
    Lu, Yihe
    Yue, Chao
    Jin, Zhao
    Lan, Zhiyang
    Li, Siya
    Yang, Pan
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [44] Land use and land cover change and its impact on river morphology in Johor River Basin, Malaysia
    Kang, Chuen Siang
    Kanniah, Kasturi Devi
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2022, 41
  • [45] Effects of Land Use/Cover Change on Terrestrial Carbon Stocks in the Yellow River Basin of China from 2000 to 2030
    Zhang, Jiejun
    Yang, Jie
    Liu, Pengfei
    Liu, Yi
    Zheng, Yiwen
    Shen, Xiaoyu
    Li, Bingchen
    Song, Hongquan
    Liang, Zongzheng
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (10)
  • [46] NATIONAL LAND COVER MAPPING USING VARIOUS REMOTE SENSING DATASETS IN GEE
    Kaplan, Gordana
    Milevski, Ivica
    Valjarevic, Aleksandar
    CARPATHIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES, 2022, 17 (02): : 297 - 306
  • [47] Land Use/Land Cover Mapping Based on GEE for the Monitoring of Changes in Ecosystem Types in the Upper Yellow River Basin over the Tibetan Plateau
    Feng, Senyao
    Li, Wenlong
    Xu, Jing
    Liang, Tiangang
    Ma, Xuanlong
    Wang, Wenying
    Yu, Hongyan
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [48] Impact of Land Use/Land Cover Change on Ecological Quality during Urbanization in the Lower Yellow River Basin: A Case Study of Jinan City
    Yu, Guangting
    Liu, Tongwen
    Wang, Qi
    Li, Tao
    Li, Xiujing
    Song, Guanhan
    Feng, Yougui
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [49] Investigation of changes in the annual maximum flood in the Yellow River basin, China
    Bai, Peng
    Liu, Xiaomang
    Liang, Kang
    Liu, Changming
    QUATERNARY INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 392 : 168 - 177
  • [50] Quantifying the Land Use and Land Cover Changes in the Yellow River Basin while Accounting for Data Errors Based on GlobeLand30 Maps
    Sun, Xiaofang
    Li, Guicai
    Wang, Junbang
    Wang, Meng
    LAND, 2021, 10 (01) : 1 - 18