Comparison of Various Annual Land Cover Datasets in the Yellow River Basin

被引:8
|
作者
Liu, Bo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Zemin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pan, Libo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sun, Yibo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ji, Shengnan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guan, Xiao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Junsheng [4 ]
Xu, Mingzhu [5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Protect Reg Ecoproc & Funct, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, Inst Ecol, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[4] CGS, Command Ctr Nat Resources Comprehens Survey, Beijing 100055, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Environm Technol Co Ltd, Hangzhou 311100, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
annual land cover datasets; Yellow River Basin; spatial and temporal distribution; error decomposition analysis; landscape heterogeneity; BIG DATA APPLICATIONS; GOOGLE EARTH ENGINE; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; LOESS PLATEAU; AREA; DYNAMICS; MODIS; PRECIPITATION; TEMPERATURE; PIXELS;
D O I
10.3390/rs15102539
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate land cover (LC) datasets are the basis for global environmental and climate change studies. Recently, numerous open-source annual LC datasets have been created due to advances in remote sensing technology. However, the agreements and sources of error that affect the accuracy of current annual LC datasets are not well understood, which limits the widespread use of these datasets. We compared four annual LC datasets, namely the CLCD, MCD12Q1, CCI-LC, and GLASS-LC, in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) to identify their spatial and temporal agreement for nine LC classes and to analyze their sources of error. The Mann-Kendall test, Sen's slope analysis, Taylor diagram, and error decomposition analysis were used in this study. Our results showed that the main LC classes in the four datasets were grassland and cropland (total area percentage > 80%), but their trends in area of change were different. For the main LC classes, the temporal agreement was the highest between the CCI-LC and CLCD (0.85), followed by the MCD12Q1 (0.21), while the lowest was between the GLASS-LC and CLCD (-0.11). The spatial distribution of area for the main LC classes was largely similar between the four datasets, but the spatial agreement in their trends in area of change varied considerably. The spatial variation in the trends in area of change for the cropland, forest, grassland, barren, and impervious LC classes were mainly located in the upstream area region (UA) and the midstream area region (MA) of the YRB, where the percentage of systematic error was high (>68.55%). This indicated that the spatial variation between the four datasets was mainly caused by systematic errors. Between the four datasets, the total error increased along with landscape heterogeneity. These results not only improve our understanding of the spatial and temporal agreement and sources of error between the various current annual LC datasets, but also provide support for land policy making in the YRB.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of land use/cover change on carbon storage between 2000 and 2040 in the Yellow River Basin, China
    Xu, Chenglong
    Zhang, Qibin
    Yu, Qiang
    Wang, Jiping
    Wang, Fei
    Qiu, Shi
    Ai, Mingsi
    Zhao, Jikai
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 151
  • [32] Trends characteristics of annual runoff changes in Yellow River Basin
    Li, CH
    Yang, ZF
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE CHINA ASSOCIATION FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL 1, NO 1, 2004, : 467 - 474
  • [33] The impact of climate variability and land use/cover change on the water balance in the Middle Yellow River Basin, China
    Bao, Zhenxin
    Zhang, Jianyun
    Wang, Guoqing
    Chen, Qiuwen
    Guan, Tiesheng
    Yan, Xiaolin
    Liu, Cuishan
    Liu, Jing
    Wang, Jie
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 577
  • [34] Study on the Annual Runoff Change and Its Relationship with Fractional Vegetation Cover and Climate Change in the Chinese Yellow River Basin
    Xu, Lin
    Mu, Hongxu
    Jian, Shengqi
    Li, Xinan
    WATER, 2024, 16 (11)
  • [35] IMPACT OF VARIOUS RANGE IMPROVEMENT PRACTICES ON WATERSHED PROTECTIVE COVER AND ANNUAL PRODUCTION WITHIN THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN
    HESSARY, IK
    GIFFORD, GF
    JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1979, 32 (02): : 134 - 140
  • [36] Determination of land use and land cover of the upper and middle basin of the Lujan river
    Riva, Pedro
    Guidi, Rodrigo Gonzalez
    Caro, Anibal Sanchez
    Gaspari, Fernanda Julia
    REVISTA DE GEOGRAFIA NORTE GRANDE, 2024, (89)
  • [37] Stream fish assemblages and basin land cover in a river network
    Park, Young-Seuk
    Grenouillet, Gael
    Esperance, Benjamin
    Lek, Sovan
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 365 (1-3) : 140 - 153
  • [38] The effect of meteorological drought on vegetation cover in the Yellow River basin, China
    Jia, Lu
    Yu, Kun-xia
    Li, Zhan-bin
    Li, Peng
    Xu, Guo-ce
    Cheng, Yu-ting
    Zhang, Xiang
    Yang, Zhi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (09) : 4830 - 4849
  • [39] Land use and cover changes on the Loess Plateau: A comparison of six global or national land use and cover datasets
    Sun, Wenyi
    Ding, Xiaotong
    Su, Jingbo
    Mu, Xingmin
    Zhang, Yongqiang
    Gao, Peng
    Zhao, Guangju
    LAND USE POLICY, 2022, 119
  • [40] Effect of Land Use/Cover Change on Soil Wind Erosion in the Yellow River Basin since the 1990s
    Chi, Wenfeng
    Wang, Yuetian
    Lou, Yuxin
    Na, Ya
    Luo, Qiancheng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (19)