Comparison of Various Annual Land Cover Datasets in the Yellow River Basin

被引:8
|
作者
Liu, Bo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Zemin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pan, Libo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sun, Yibo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ji, Shengnan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guan, Xiao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Junsheng [4 ]
Xu, Mingzhu [5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Protect Reg Ecoproc & Funct, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, Inst Ecol, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[4] CGS, Command Ctr Nat Resources Comprehens Survey, Beijing 100055, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Environm Technol Co Ltd, Hangzhou 311100, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
annual land cover datasets; Yellow River Basin; spatial and temporal distribution; error decomposition analysis; landscape heterogeneity; BIG DATA APPLICATIONS; GOOGLE EARTH ENGINE; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; LOESS PLATEAU; AREA; DYNAMICS; MODIS; PRECIPITATION; TEMPERATURE; PIXELS;
D O I
10.3390/rs15102539
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate land cover (LC) datasets are the basis for global environmental and climate change studies. Recently, numerous open-source annual LC datasets have been created due to advances in remote sensing technology. However, the agreements and sources of error that affect the accuracy of current annual LC datasets are not well understood, which limits the widespread use of these datasets. We compared four annual LC datasets, namely the CLCD, MCD12Q1, CCI-LC, and GLASS-LC, in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) to identify their spatial and temporal agreement for nine LC classes and to analyze their sources of error. The Mann-Kendall test, Sen's slope analysis, Taylor diagram, and error decomposition analysis were used in this study. Our results showed that the main LC classes in the four datasets were grassland and cropland (total area percentage > 80%), but their trends in area of change were different. For the main LC classes, the temporal agreement was the highest between the CCI-LC and CLCD (0.85), followed by the MCD12Q1 (0.21), while the lowest was between the GLASS-LC and CLCD (-0.11). The spatial distribution of area for the main LC classes was largely similar between the four datasets, but the spatial agreement in their trends in area of change varied considerably. The spatial variation in the trends in area of change for the cropland, forest, grassland, barren, and impervious LC classes were mainly located in the upstream area region (UA) and the midstream area region (MA) of the YRB, where the percentage of systematic error was high (>68.55%). This indicated that the spatial variation between the four datasets was mainly caused by systematic errors. Between the four datasets, the total error increased along with landscape heterogeneity. These results not only improve our understanding of the spatial and temporal agreement and sources of error between the various current annual LC datasets, but also provide support for land policy making in the YRB.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Spatiotemporal Variation of Evapotranspiration on Different Land Use/Cover in the Inner Mongolia Reach of the Yellow River Basin
    Zhang, Xiaojing
    Wang, Guoqiang
    Xue, Baolin
    Wang, Yuntao
    Wang, Libo
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (18)
  • [22] The impacts of climate change and land cover/use transition on the hydrology in the upper Yellow River Basin, China
    Cuo, Lan
    Zhang, Yongxin
    Gao, Yanhong
    Hao, Zhenchun
    Cairang, Luosang
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2013, 502 : 37 - 52
  • [23] Comparison and evaluation of multiple land surface products for the water budget in the Yellow River Basin
    Liu, Yonghe
    Yang, Zongliang
    Lin, Peirong
    Zheng, Ziyan
    Xie, Shengjin
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 584 (584)
  • [24] Land Cover Change in the Barekese River Basin of Ghana
    Tyhra Carolyn Kumasi
    Kwasi Obiri-Danso
    James Hawkins Ephraim
    地学前缘, 2009, (S1) : 101 - 101
  • [25] LAND COVER/LAND USE CHANGES IN THE MOLOLOA RIVER BASIN, NAYARIT
    Najera Gonzalez, O.
    Bojorquez Serrano, J., I
    Cifuentes Lemus, J. L.
    Marceleno Flores, S.
    REVISTA BIO CIENCIAS, 2010, 1 (01): : 19 - 29
  • [26] THE IMPACT OF RELIEF ON LAND COVER AND LAND USE OF THE LLAP RIVER BASIN
    Bulliqi, Shpejtim
    Krasniqi, Leutrim
    Isufi, Florim
    PRESENT ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 14 (01) : 231 - 241
  • [27] Effects of land use and land cover change under shared socioeconomic pathways on future climate in the Yellow River basin, China
    Ru, Xutong
    Qiao, Longxin
    Zhang, Haopeng
    Bai, Tianqi
    Min, Ruiqi
    Wang, Yaobin
    Wang, Qianfeng
    Song, Hongquan
    URBAN CLIMATE, 2024, 55
  • [28] Assessing regional sustainability: the case of land use and land cover change in the middle Yiluo catchment of the Yellow River basin, China
    Li, XJ
    Peterson, J
    Liu, GJ
    Qian, LX
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2001, 21 (01) : 87 - 106
  • [29] Global 10 m Land Use Land Cover Datasets: A Comparison of Dynamic World, World Cover and Esri Land Cover
    Venter, Zander S.
    Barton, David N.
    Chakraborty, Tirthankar
    Simensen, Trond
    Singh, Geethen
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [30] Land Use/Cover and Influence Factors in the Lower Yellow River
    Xie Y.
    Cheng S.
    Zhang Y.
    Zhang Q.
    Jiang H.
    Li Z.
    Zhao Z.
    Beijing Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2019, 55 (03): : 489 - 500