Comparison of Various Annual Land Cover Datasets in the Yellow River Basin

被引:8
|
作者
Liu, Bo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Zemin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pan, Libo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sun, Yibo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ji, Shengnan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Guan, Xiao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li, Junsheng [4 ]
Xu, Mingzhu [5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Criteria & Risk Assessment, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, State Key Lab Environm Protect Reg Ecoproc & Funct, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Res Inst Environm Sci, Inst Ecol, Beijing 100012, Peoples R China
[4] CGS, Command Ctr Nat Resources Comprehens Survey, Beijing 100055, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Environm Technol Co Ltd, Hangzhou 311100, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
annual land cover datasets; Yellow River Basin; spatial and temporal distribution; error decomposition analysis; landscape heterogeneity; BIG DATA APPLICATIONS; GOOGLE EARTH ENGINE; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; LOESS PLATEAU; AREA; DYNAMICS; MODIS; PRECIPITATION; TEMPERATURE; PIXELS;
D O I
10.3390/rs15102539
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate land cover (LC) datasets are the basis for global environmental and climate change studies. Recently, numerous open-source annual LC datasets have been created due to advances in remote sensing technology. However, the agreements and sources of error that affect the accuracy of current annual LC datasets are not well understood, which limits the widespread use of these datasets. We compared four annual LC datasets, namely the CLCD, MCD12Q1, CCI-LC, and GLASS-LC, in the Yellow River Basin (YRB) to identify their spatial and temporal agreement for nine LC classes and to analyze their sources of error. The Mann-Kendall test, Sen's slope analysis, Taylor diagram, and error decomposition analysis were used in this study. Our results showed that the main LC classes in the four datasets were grassland and cropland (total area percentage > 80%), but their trends in area of change were different. For the main LC classes, the temporal agreement was the highest between the CCI-LC and CLCD (0.85), followed by the MCD12Q1 (0.21), while the lowest was between the GLASS-LC and CLCD (-0.11). The spatial distribution of area for the main LC classes was largely similar between the four datasets, but the spatial agreement in their trends in area of change varied considerably. The spatial variation in the trends in area of change for the cropland, forest, grassland, barren, and impervious LC classes were mainly located in the upstream area region (UA) and the midstream area region (MA) of the YRB, where the percentage of systematic error was high (>68.55%). This indicated that the spatial variation between the four datasets was mainly caused by systematic errors. Between the four datasets, the total error increased along with landscape heterogeneity. These results not only improve our understanding of the spatial and temporal agreement and sources of error between the various current annual LC datasets, but also provide support for land policy making in the YRB.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Which land cover product provides the most accurate land use land cover map of the Yellow River Basin?
    Zhang, Weige
    Tian, Junjie
    Zhang, Xiaohu
    Cheng, Jinlong
    Yan, Yan
    FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 11
  • [2] Land cover classification over Yellow River basin using satellite data
    Matsuoka, M
    Hayasaka, T
    Fukushima, Y
    Honda, Y
    IGARSS 2004: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-7: SCIENCE FOR SOCIETY: EXPLORING AND MANAGING A CHANGING PLANET, 2004, : 231 - 234
  • [3] Effects of Land Use and Land Cover Change on Temperature in Summer over the Yellow River Basin, China
    Ru, Xutong
    Song, Hongquan
    Xia, Haoming
    Zhai, Shiyan
    Wang, Yaobin
    Min, Ruiqi
    Zhang, Haopeng
    Qiao, Longxin
    REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 14 (17)
  • [4] Spatiotemporal Characteristics of Land Cover Change in the Yellow River Basin over the Past Millennium
    Wang, Yafei
    Yang, Fan
    He, Fanneng
    LAND, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [5] Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Land Cover and Their Driving Forces in the Yellow River Basin since 1990
    Zhao, Shirui
    Fan, Zemeng
    Gao, Xing
    LAND, 2022, 11 (09)
  • [6] Impact of climate fluctuation and land-cover changes on runoff in the Yellow River basin
    Wang Miaolin
    Xia Jun
    Regional Hydrological Impacts of Climatic Change - Impact Assessment and Decision Making, 2005, 295 : 183 - 188
  • [7] Estimating the potential evapotranspiration over the Yellow River basin by considering the land cover characteristics
    Zhou, M. C.
    Ishidaira, H.
    Takeuchi, K.
    PREDICTIONS IN UNGAUGED BASINS: PROMISE AND PROGRESS, 2006, 303 : 214 - +
  • [8] Impacts of Land-use and Land-cover Changes on River Runoff in Yellow River Basin for Period of 1956–2012
    WANG Fang
    GE Quansheng
    YU Qibiao
    WANG Huaxin
    XU Xinliang
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27 (01) : 13 - 24
  • [9] Impacts of land-use and land-cover changes on river runoff in Yellow River basin for period of 1956–2012
    Fang Wang
    Quansheng Ge
    Qibiao Yu
    Huaxin Wang
    Xinliang Xu
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, 27 : 13 - 24
  • [10] Impacts of Land-use and Land-cover Changes on River Runoff in Yellow River Basin for Period of 1956–2012
    WANG Fang
    GE Quansheng
    YU Qibiao
    WANG Huaxin
    XU Xinliang
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2017, (01) : 13 - 24