Analysis of the Cellular Response to Different Dental Implant Surfaces: An In vitro Study

被引:0
|
作者
Sghaireen, Mohammed G. [1 ]
Alrwuili, Mohammad Raji [2 ]
Alenzi, Nasser Attallah [3 ]
Aljabab, Mohammed Ahmed [2 ]
Issrani, Rakhi [4 ]
Alam, Mohammad Khursheed [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Jouf Univ, Coll Dent, Prosthodont Dent Dept, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia
[2] Qurayyat Specialized Dent Ctr, Orthodont Dept, Al Qurayyat, Saudi Arabia
[3] Western Riyadh Dent Complex, Orthodont Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Jouf Univ, Coll Dent, Prevent Dent Dept, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia
[5] Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Dent Res Cell, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[6] Daffodil Int Univ, Fac Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Dhaka, Bangladesh
关键词
Cellular response; dental implants; in vitro study; osseointegration; surface modification; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; INTEGRATION; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_329_24
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Dental implant surfaces play a crucial role in determining the success of osseointegration and long-term stability. Understanding the cellular response to various implant surfaces is essential for optimizing implant design and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, we investigated the cellular response to different dental implant surfaces. Titanium implants with three distinct surface treatments (polished, acid-etched, and sandblasted) were prepared. Human osteoblast-like cells were cultured on these surfaces, and cellular behaviors including adhesion, proliferation, and morphology were evaluated using standard assays and imaging techniques. Results: Our results revealed significant differences in cellular responses among the different implant surfaces. Cells exhibited higher adhesion and proliferation rates on the acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces compared to the polished surface. Furthermore, cells displayed a more spread-out morphology with well-defined filopodia and lamellipodia on the acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces, indicating enhanced cellular interaction and spreading. Conclusion: The cellular response to dental implant surfaces varies depending on surface characteristics. Acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces promote better cellular adhesion, proliferation, and spreading compared to polished surfaces. These findings underscore the importance of surface modifications in enhancing osseointegration and ultimately improving the success rates of dental implant procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:S2521 / S2523
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE STUDY OF THE DENTAL PLAQUE FORMATION ON DIFFERENT IMPLANT SURFACES
    Kim, Jin-Woo
    Han, Se-Jin
    Kim, Kyung-Wook
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2008, 34 (03) : 325 - 340
  • [2] An in vitro biofilm model associated to dental implants: Structural and quantitative analysis of in vitro biofilm formation on different dental implant surfaces
    Sanchez, M. C.
    Llama-Palacios, A.
    Fernandez, E.
    Figuero, E.
    Marin, M. J.
    Leon, R.
    Blanc, V.
    Herrera, D.
    Sanz, M.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2014, 30 (10) : 1161 - 1171
  • [3] In Vitro Characterization of an Anodized Surface of a Dental Implant Collar and Dental Abutment on Peri-Implant Cellular Response
    Traver-Mendez, Valeria
    Camps-Font, Octavi
    Ventura, Francesc
    Nicolau-Sanso, Miquel Angel
    Subira-Pifarre, Carles
    Figueiredo, Rui
    Valmaseda-Castellon, Eduard
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (17)
  • [4] Human osteoblasts response to different dental implant abutment materials: An in-vitro study
    Osman, Muataz A.
    Alamoush, Rasha A.
    Kushnerev, Evgeny
    Seymour, Kevin G.
    Shawcross, Susan
    Yates, Julian M.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2022, 38 (09) : 1547 - 1557
  • [5] An in vitro study of the treatment of implant surfaces with different instruments
    Mengel, R
    Buns, CE
    Mengel, C
    Flores-de-Jacoby, L
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 1998, 13 (01) : 91 - 96
  • [6] Primary Implant Stability Analysis of Different Dental Implant Connections and Designs-An In Vitro Comparative Study
    Raz, Perry
    Meir, Haya
    Levartovsky, Shifra
    Sebaoun, Alon
    Beitlitum, Ilan
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (09)
  • [7] Two Gingival Cell Lines Response to Different Dental Implant Abutment Materials: An In Vitro Study
    Osman, Muataz A.
    Kushnerev, Evgeny
    Alamoush, Rasha A.
    Seymour, Kevin G.
    Yates, Julian M.
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2022, 10 (10)
  • [8] A comparative in vitro study of cellular growth on differing implant surfaces.
    Shaikh, B
    Walter, J
    McDonald, F
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2000, 15 : S377 - S377
  • [9] Plasma of Argon Affects the Earliest Biological Response of Different Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Comparative Study
    Canullo, L.
    Genova, T.
    Tallarico, M.
    Gautier, G.
    Mussano, F.
    Botticelli, D.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2016, 95 (05) : 566 - 573
  • [10] Dental implant surfaces after insertion in bone: an in vitro study in four commercial implant systems
    Deppe, Herbert
    Wolff, Carolina
    Bauer, Florian
    Ruthenberg, Ricarda
    Sculean, Anton
    Muecke, Thomas
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 22 (03) : 1593 - 1600