Analysis of the Cellular Response to Different Dental Implant Surfaces: An In vitro Study

被引:0
|
作者
Sghaireen, Mohammed G. [1 ]
Alrwuili, Mohammad Raji [2 ]
Alenzi, Nasser Attallah [3 ]
Aljabab, Mohammed Ahmed [2 ]
Issrani, Rakhi [4 ]
Alam, Mohammad Khursheed [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Jouf Univ, Coll Dent, Prosthodont Dent Dept, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia
[2] Qurayyat Specialized Dent Ctr, Orthodont Dept, Al Qurayyat, Saudi Arabia
[3] Western Riyadh Dent Complex, Orthodont Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Jouf Univ, Coll Dent, Prevent Dent Dept, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia
[5] Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Dent Res Cell, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[6] Daffodil Int Univ, Fac Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Dhaka, Bangladesh
关键词
Cellular response; dental implants; in vitro study; osseointegration; surface modification; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; INTEGRATION; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_329_24
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Dental implant surfaces play a crucial role in determining the success of osseointegration and long-term stability. Understanding the cellular response to various implant surfaces is essential for optimizing implant design and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, we investigated the cellular response to different dental implant surfaces. Titanium implants with three distinct surface treatments (polished, acid-etched, and sandblasted) were prepared. Human osteoblast-like cells were cultured on these surfaces, and cellular behaviors including adhesion, proliferation, and morphology were evaluated using standard assays and imaging techniques. Results: Our results revealed significant differences in cellular responses among the different implant surfaces. Cells exhibited higher adhesion and proliferation rates on the acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces compared to the polished surface. Furthermore, cells displayed a more spread-out morphology with well-defined filopodia and lamellipodia on the acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces, indicating enhanced cellular interaction and spreading. Conclusion: The cellular response to dental implant surfaces varies depending on surface characteristics. Acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces promote better cellular adhesion, proliferation, and spreading compared to polished surfaces. These findings underscore the importance of surface modifications in enhancing osseointegration and ultimately improving the success rates of dental implant procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:S2521 / S2523
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In vitro evaluation of the antibiofilm properties of chlorhexidine and delmopinol on dental implant surfaces
    Ready, Derren
    Theodoridis, Georgios
    Green, Ingrid
    Ciric, Lena
    Pratten, Jonathan
    Tay, Weiming
    McDonald, Ailbhe
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2015, 45 (06) : 662 - 666
  • [32] Photofunctionalization of Dental Implant Surfaces - A Histomorphometric Animal Study
    Paul, Veena
    Mathew, Aby T.
    Rasheed, Nazia
    Thomas, Annie Susan
    George, Nebu
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 15 : S646 - S650
  • [33] Experimental study of plasma nitriding dental implant surfaces
    Guerra Neto, C. L. B.
    da Silva, M. A. M.
    Alves, C., Jr.
    SURFACE ENGINEERING, 2009, 25 (06) : 430 - 433
  • [34] Cell Behavior Related to Implant Surfaces with Different Microstructure and Chemical Composition: An In Vitro Analysis
    Conserva, Enrico
    Lanuti, Anna
    Menini, Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2010, 25 (06) : 1099 - 1107
  • [35] Elimination of bacteria on different implant surfaces through photosensitization and soft laser - An in vitro study
    Haas, R
    Dortbudak, O
    MensdorffPouilly, N
    Mailath, G
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1997, 8 (04) : 249 - 254
  • [36] Titanium dental implant surfaces
    Elias, Carlos Nelson
    MATERIA-RIO DE JANEIRO, 2010, 15 (02): : 140 - 144
  • [37] Antimicrobial Effects of Three Different Treatment Modalities on Dental Implant Surfaces
    Larsen, Olav I.
    Enersen, Morten
    Kristoffersen, Anne Karin
    Wennerberg, Ann
    Bunaes, Dagmar F.
    Lie, Stein Atle
    Leknes, Knut N.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2017, 43 (06) : 429 - 436
  • [38] Effect of Bergenin on Human Gingival Fibroblast Response on Zirconia Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Study
    Xiong, John
    Miller, Catherine M.
    Sharma, Dileep
    JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2023, 14 (09)
  • [39] In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces
    Augthun, M
    Tinschert, J
    Huber, A
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 69 (08) : 857 - 864
  • [40] In vitro evaluation of a multispecies oral biofilm on different implant surfaces
    Violant, Deborah
    Galofre, Marta
    Nart, Jose
    Teles, Ricardo Patricio
    BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2014, 9 (03)