Analysis of the Cellular Response to Different Dental Implant Surfaces: An In vitro Study

被引:0
|
作者
Sghaireen, Mohammed G. [1 ]
Alrwuili, Mohammad Raji [2 ]
Alenzi, Nasser Attallah [3 ]
Aljabab, Mohammed Ahmed [2 ]
Issrani, Rakhi [4 ]
Alam, Mohammad Khursheed [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Jouf Univ, Coll Dent, Prosthodont Dent Dept, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia
[2] Qurayyat Specialized Dent Ctr, Orthodont Dept, Al Qurayyat, Saudi Arabia
[3] Western Riyadh Dent Complex, Orthodont Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Jouf Univ, Coll Dent, Prevent Dent Dept, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia
[5] Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Dent Res Cell, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[6] Daffodil Int Univ, Fac Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Dhaka, Bangladesh
关键词
Cellular response; dental implants; in vitro study; osseointegration; surface modification; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; INTEGRATION; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_329_24
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Dental implant surfaces play a crucial role in determining the success of osseointegration and long-term stability. Understanding the cellular response to various implant surfaces is essential for optimizing implant design and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, we investigated the cellular response to different dental implant surfaces. Titanium implants with three distinct surface treatments (polished, acid-etched, and sandblasted) were prepared. Human osteoblast-like cells were cultured on these surfaces, and cellular behaviors including adhesion, proliferation, and morphology were evaluated using standard assays and imaging techniques. Results: Our results revealed significant differences in cellular responses among the different implant surfaces. Cells exhibited higher adhesion and proliferation rates on the acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces compared to the polished surface. Furthermore, cells displayed a more spread-out morphology with well-defined filopodia and lamellipodia on the acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces, indicating enhanced cellular interaction and spreading. Conclusion: The cellular response to dental implant surfaces varies depending on surface characteristics. Acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces promote better cellular adhesion, proliferation, and spreading compared to polished surfaces. These findings underscore the importance of surface modifications in enhancing osseointegration and ultimately improving the success rates of dental implant procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:S2521 / S2523
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Accuracy of dental implant placement using different dynamic navigation and robotic systems: an in vitro study
    Xu, Zonghe
    Zhou, Lin
    Han, Bin
    Wu, Shuang
    Xiao, Yanjun
    Zhang, Sihui
    Chen, Jiang
    Guo, Jianbin
    Wu, Dong
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 7 (01):
  • [42] Clinical comparison of peri-implant response to different implant surfaces.
    McGlumphy, EA
    Peterson, LJ
    Larsen, PE
    Smith, NE
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 561 - 561
  • [43] Topographic characterization of multispecies biofilms growing on dental implant surfaces: An in vitro model
    Bermejo, Patricia
    Carmen Sanchez, Maria
    Llama-Palacios, Arancha
    Figuero, Elena
    Herrera, David
    Sanz, Mariano
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (03) : 229 - 241
  • [44] Novel Application of Cytodetachment Technology to the Analysis of Dental Implant Surfaces
    Bhatavadekar, Neel B.
    Hu, Jerry
    Keys, Kevin
    Ofek, Gidon
    Athanasiou, Kyriacos A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2011, 26 (05) : 985 - 990
  • [45] Microbiologic and radiographic analysis of ligature-induced peri-implantitis with different dental implant surfaces
    Shibli, JA
    Martins, MC
    Lotufo, RFM
    Marcantonio, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2003, 18 (03) : 383 - 390
  • [46] IN VITRO ANALYSIS OF THE BONE ONGROWTH AT BIOACTIVE IMPLANT SURFACES
    Lochner, K.
    Erdmann, C.
    Luedtke, B.
    Hansmann, D.
    Fulda, G.
    Neumann, H.
    Mittelmeier, W.
    Bader, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2008, 31 (07): : 610 - 610
  • [47] The impact of implant-related characteristics on dental implant blooming: An in vitro study
    Tarce, Mihai
    de Greef, Alexander
    Lahoud, Pierre
    Vasconcelos, Karla de Faria
    Jacobs, Reinhilde
    Quirynen, Marc
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (12) : 1199 - 1211
  • [48] Biomechanical analysis of 12 different dental implant geometries
    Liang, Rui
    Guo, Wei-Hua
    Wen, Hai-Lin
    Tian, Wei-Dong
    Wei, Yong-Tao
    Sichuan Daxue Xuebao (Gongcheng Kexue Ban)/Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Edition), 2012, 44 (SUPPL.2): : 60 - 63
  • [49] Correlation of two different devices for the evaluation of primary implant stability depending on dental implant length and bone density: An in vitro study
    Lee, Jungwon
    Lim, Young-Jun
    Ahn, Jin-Soo
    Kim, Bongju
    Baek, Yeon-Wha
    Lim, Bum-Soon
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [50] The accuracy of different macrogeometry of dental implant in dynamic navigation guided immediate implant placement in the maxillary aesthetic zone: an in vitro study
    Chen, Jinyan
    Yu, Xinbo
    Wu, Yiqun
    Wang, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2025, 11 (01)