Identifying the impacts of landscape structure on ecosystem services trade-offs among ecosystem services bundles in the mountains of Southwest China

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Weijie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kang, Jinwen [1 ]
Wang, Yong [4 ]
机构
[1] China West Normal Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China
[2] China West Normal Univ, Sichuan Prov Engn Lab Monitoring & Control Soil Er, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China
[3] China West Normal Univ, Inst Jialing River Basin, Nanchong 637009, Peoples R China
[4] Southwest Univ, Sch Geog Sci, Chongqing Key Lab Karst Environm, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
关键词
Ecosystem services; Ecosystem services bundle; Trade-offs/synergies; Landscape composition and configuration; Driving forces; Southwest China; SYNERGIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoleng.2024.107419
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Environmental Managers strive to enhance synergistic provisioning of ecosystem services (ESs) by optimizing landscape structure. However, understanding the impact of landscape structure on ESs trade-offs relationships from ESs bundles perspective is inadequate, particularly in distinguishing the relative contributions of landscape compositions and configurations. To fill this gap, taking the Southwest (SW) China as an example, this study quantified five relevant provisioning and regulating services, including grain production (GP), water retention (WR), carbon sequestration (CS), soil retention (SR), and habitat quality (HQ), based on biological models; analyzed the trade-offs/synergies relationships among ESs through Pearson correlation and bivariate spatial autocorrelation; further identified ESs bundles and explored the relationship between ESs trade-offs and landscape structure with the help of self-organizing map (SOM) method and redundancy analysis (RDA). Our results showed land use types influenced the spatial distribution of the five ESs, with the dominant land use in hotspot areas being forest land, and in coldspot areas being farmland and grassland. Four ESs bundles were identified based on spatial differentiation and internal structure characteristics. In the entire SW, the regulating services showed synergistic relationships with each other. However, a few trade-offs existed in different bundles (e.g., WR-CS and WR-SR in bundle 1; GP-HQ and GP-WR in bundle 2; GP-SR in bundle 3; GP-CS in bundles 4). Landscape compositions showed a stronger influence on ESs trade-offs than landscape configuration. The area proportion of woodland contributed the most to ESs in the entire SW and within bundle 1-3, while the area proportion of cultivated land was the main driver of ESs within bundle 4, indicating there was scale dependence in the relationship between landscape composition and ESs. The findings can propose targeted management measures for regional ecosystems to enhance human welfare and achieve regional high-quality development.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria framework for identifying the trade-offs and synergies relationship of ecosystem services based on ecosystem services bundles
    Wu, Linlin
    Sun, Caige
    Fan, Fenglei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2022, 144
  • [2] Impacts of landscape configurations on ecosystem services and their trade-offs across different landscape compositions
    Huang, Jiasi
    Xia, Zheyi
    Liu, Liming
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 70
  • [3] Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Southwestern China
    Ran, Chen
    Wang, Shijie
    Bai, Xiaoyong
    Tan, Qiu
    Zhao, Cuiwei
    Luo, Xuling
    Chen, Huan
    Xi, Huipeng
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2020, 37 (10) : 669 - 678
  • [4] Mapping ecosystem services bundles for analyzing spatial trade-offs in inner Mongolia, China
    Dou, Huashun
    Li, Xiaobing
    Li, Shengkun
    Dang, Dongliang
    Li, Xiang
    Lyu, Xin
    Li, Mengyuan
    Liu, Siyu
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 256
  • [5] Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services and their trade-offs in the Hengduan Mountain region, Southwest China
    Wang, Yahui
    Dai, Erfu
    Ge, Quansheng
    Zhang, Xianzhou
    Yu, Chengqun
    CATENA, 2021, 207
  • [6] Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystem services trade-offs among ecosystem service bundles in an alpine mountainous region: A case- study in the Qilian Mountains, Northwest China
    Teng, Yanmin
    Zhan, Jinyan
    Liu, Wei
    Chu, Xi
    Zhang, Fan
    Wang, Chao
    Wang, Lanyuan
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 33 (11) : 1846 - 1861
  • [7] Trade-offs among ecosystem services in a typical Karst watershed, SW China
    Tian, Yichao
    Wang, Shijie
    Bai, Xiaoyong
    Luo, Guangjie
    Xu, Yan
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 566 : 1297 - 1308
  • [8] Ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies in China, 2000–2015
    W. Chen
    G. Chi
    International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2023, 20 : 3221 - 3236
  • [9] Trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services for the Yinchuan Basin in China
    Li, Boyan
    Wang, Wei
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 84 : 837 - 846
  • [10] Exploring social-ecological impacts on trade-offs and synergies among ecosystem services
    Wang, Xiaoyu
    Peng, Jian
    Luo, Yuhang
    Qiu, Sijing
    Dong, Jianquan
    Zhang, Zimo
    Vercruysse, Kim
    Grabowski, Robert C.
    Meersmans, Jeroen
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 197