Motivations for and experience with labor induction at 39 weeks in women with obesity-A qualitative study

被引:0
|
作者
Hansen, Joan [1 ]
Krogh, Lise Qvirin [2 ,3 ]
Fuglsang, Jens [2 ,3 ]
Boie, Sidsel [4 ]
Henriksen, Tine Brink [3 ]
Taastrom, Katja Albert [2 ]
Kjeldsen, Anne Cathrine Maqving [2 ]
Glavind, Julie [2 ,3 ]
Lou, Stina [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Godstrup Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Godstrup, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Randers Reg Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Randers, Denmark
[5] DEFACTUM Publ Hlth Res, Aarhus, Central Denmark, Denmark
关键词
induction of labor; obesity; outpatients; pregnancy; qualitative research; BIRTH EXPERIENCE; OVERWEIGHT;
D O I
10.1111/aogs.14993
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
IntroductionTiming of induction of labor (IOL) at term has been investigated in multiple settings. In Denmark, the 'When to INDuce for OverWeight' (WINDOW) study compares IOL at 39 weeks of gestation versus expectant management in low-risk women with obesity. However, knowledge on women's expectations of and experience with IOL is sparse. The aim of this study was to explore women's motivation to join the WINDOW study and their experience when randomized to IOL at 39 gestational weeks.Material and MethodsA qualitative interview study of 25 pregnant women with obesity randomized in the WINDOW study to IOL at 39 weeks of gestation was conducted. Participants were recruited from four hospitals in Central Denmark Region and were interviewed four to six weeks after giving birth. A thematic analysis was performed using a phenomenological approach.ResultsThe analysis resulted in three main themes, (1) Motivation for IOL, (2) The IOL process, and (3) IOL in recollection and in the future. Participants perceived inclusion into the WINDOW study as a "great opportunity," as they hoped to be randomized to IOL at 39 weeks of gestation. Their main motivation for participating was physical discomfort in late pregnancy and a wish for "knowing" the timing of the birth. BMI-related risk factors were mentioned by few as a motivating factor. Some participants described the IOL process as a team effort between the couple and the midwives and were positive towards future IOL. Others associated the IOL process with prolonged labor or described the body as "reluctant" to respond to the induction regime. A desire to experience spontaneous onset of labor in a future pregnancy was mentioned.ConclusionsPhysical discomfort and wanting to "control" the onset of labor were main motivations for women's decision to participate in the WINDOW study, hoping they would be allocated for IOL. Comprehensive information and being supported by midwives through the IOL process was crucial for a positive IOL experience. Some participants were positive towards a future IOL. Others speculated if their body was not ready for birth in 39 weeks of gestation and/or associated the IOL process with a challenging labor.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 224
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] INDUCTION OF LABOR AT 39 WEEKS IN NULLIPAROUS WOMEN: IS IT COST-EFFECTIVE?
    Kaimal, Anjali
    Little, Sarah
    Odibo, Anthony
    Stamilio, David
    Caughey, Aaron
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 199 (06) : S68 - S68
  • [2] Labor induction place at 39 weeks in low-risk nulliparous women
    Hamadmad, R.
    Delorme, P.
    Michel, A. S.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2020, 48 (04): : 404 - 405
  • [3] The impact of induction of labor at 39 weeks on the incidence of stillbirth in low-risk women
    Peleg, David
    Warsof, Steven L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 223 (01) : 139 - 140
  • [4] Labor Induction at 39 Weeks Versus Expectant Management in Women With Prior Cesarean Delivery
    Shepherd, Megan C.
    Lee, Alan
    Olson, Gayle
    Saad, Antonio
    Saade, George R.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 173S - 173S
  • [5] Should we offer elective induction of labor to nulliparous women at 39 weeks? REPLY
    Grobman, William A.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 221 (03) : 288 - 289
  • [6] Elective Induction of Labor Compared With Expectant Management of Nulliparous Women at 39 Weeks of Gestation
    Miller, Nathaniel R.
    Cypher, Rebecca L.
    Foglia, Lisa M.
    Pates, Jason A.
    Nielsen, Peter E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (06): : 1258 - 1264
  • [7] The impact of induction of labor at 39 weeks in low-risk women on the incidence of stillbirth
    Po, Gaia
    Oliver, Emily A.
    Reddy, Uma M.
    Silver, Robert M.
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : 88 - 90
  • [8] Is Labor Induction at 39 Weeks Linked to Adverse Outcomes?
    Nelson, Roxanne
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2019, 119 (02) : 16 - 17
  • [9] Induction of Labor at 39 Weeks and the Risk of Perinatal Death
    Diaz, Maria
    Bs, Jordan Rossi
    Md, Sabrina Burn
    Md, Stephen Contag
    Yao, Ruofan
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 172S - 172S
  • [10] Labor Induction at 39 Weeks Compared with Expectant Management in Low-Risk Parous Women
    Wagner, Stephen M.
    Sandoval, Grecio
    Grobman, William A.
    Bailit, Jennifer L.
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Thorp, John M., Jr.
    Prasad, Mona
    Tita, Alan T. N.
    Saade, George R.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Tolosa, Jorge E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2022, 39 (05) : 519 - 525