A study on the impact of meteorological and emission factors on PM2.5 concentrations based on machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Chenxu [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Zejian [2 ]
Yang, Leifeng [2 ]
Jiang, Mengmeng [3 ]
Qiu, Zhubing [3 ]
Wang, Siyu [3 ]
Gu, Yu [4 ]
Ye, Wei [4 ]
Pan, Yusuo [4 ]
Zhang, Yong [2 ]
Wang, Tianxin [2 ,5 ]
Jia, Yong [1 ]
Chen, Zhihang [2 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Technol, Sch Energy & Environm, Maanshan 243002, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Ecol & Environm, South China Inst Environm Sci, Guangdong Prov Engn Lab Air Pollut Control, Guangdong Key Lab Water & Air Pollut Control, Guangzhou 510655, Peoples R China
[3] Anqing Ecol Environm Bur, Anqing 246001, Anhui, Peoples R China
[4] Anqing Ecol Environm Monitoring Ctr, Anqing 246001, Anhui, Peoples R China
[5] Anhui Univ, Sch Resources & Environm Engn, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China
关键词
PMF; Machine learning; SHAP; PDP; YANGTZE-RIVER DELTA; HEAVY POLLUTION EPISODES; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; SEASONAL-VARIATIONS; NORTH CHINA; CHEMICAL-CHARACTERIZATION; AEROSOL FORMATION; BACKGROUND SITE; CITY; HAZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124347
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PM2.5 pollution, a major environmental and health concern, is influenced by a complex interplay of emission sources and meteorological conditions. Accurately identifying these factors and their contributions is essential for effective pollution management. This study applies Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) to identify primary sources of PM2.5 and uses the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and Partial Dependence Plots (PDP) to quantitatively assess the impact of meteorological and emission factors on PM2.5 concentrations. SHAP results reveal that meteorological factors contribute 16.6% (5.3 mu g/m3) to PM2.5, with humidity being the most influential, while emission sources account for 83.4% (26.8 mu g/ m3), with secondary particulate matter being the dominant factor. Secondary particulate matter and biomass burning significantly impacted PM2.5 in the first and fourth quarters, while dust sources became more influential in the second quarter, and coal emissions were most prominent in the second and third quarters. Twodimensional PDP analysis indicated that in the first and fourth quarters, secondary particulate matter concentration increased with air pressure, and the atmospheric oxidation process was more pronounced under highhumidity conditions during the day. Strong transport conditions, with wind direction shifting from north to east, also influenced secondary particulate matter levels. This study demonstrates that the LightGBM model effectively captures the nonlinear relationships between PM2.5 and meteorological and emission factors, providing a reliable approach for analyzing the causes of PM2.5 pollution.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Concentrations and emission factors for PM2.5 and PM10 from road traffic in Sweden
    Ferm, Martin
    Sjoberg, Karin
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 119 : 211 - 219
  • [22] Evaluation of Machine Learning Models for Estimating PM2.5 Concentrations across Malaysia
    Zaman, Nurul Amalin Fatihah Kamarul
    Kanniah, Kasturi Devi
    Kaskaoutis, Dimitris G.
    Latif, Mohd Talib
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (16):
  • [23] Predicting ambient PM2.5 concentrations in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia with machine learning approaches
    Temuulen Enebish
    Khang Chau
    Batbayar Jadamba
    Meredith Franklin
    Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2021, 31 : 699 - 708
  • [24] Comment on "Deep Ensemble Machine Learning Framework for the Estimation of PM2.5 Concentrations"
    Stafoggia, Massimo
    Cattani, Giorgio
    Ancona, Carla
    Gasparrini, Antonio
    Ranzi, Andrea
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2022, 130 (06)
  • [25] Evaluation of Different Machine Learning Approaches to Forecasting PM2.5 Mass Concentrations
    Karimian, Hamed
    Li, Qi
    Wu, Chunlin
    Qi, Yanlin
    Mo, Yuqin
    Chen, Gong
    Zhang, Xianfeng
    Sachdeva, Sonali
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2019, 19 (06) : 1400 - 1410
  • [26] Spatiotemporal variations and connections of single and multiple meteorological factors on PM2.5 concentrations in Xi'an, China
    Zhang, Xiaoxia
    Xu, Haidong
    Liang, Dong
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 275
  • [27] Estimating hourly surface PM2.5 concentrations across China from high-density meteorological observations by machine learning
    Zeng, Zhaoliang
    Gui, Ke
    Wang, Zemin
    Luo, Ming
    Geng, Hong
    Ge, Erjia
    An, Jiachun
    Song, Xiangyu
    Ning, Guicai
    Zhai, Shixian
    Liu, Haizhi
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2021, 254
  • [28] Study on the influencing factors on indoor PM2.5 of office buildings in beijing based on statistical and machine learning methods
    Li, Zehao
    Di, Zhenzhen
    Chang, Miao
    Zheng, Ji
    Tanaka, Toshio
    Kuroi, Kiyoshi
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2023, 66
  • [29] Influencing Factors of PM2.5 Pollution: Disaster Points of Meteorological Factors
    Sun, Ruiling
    Zhou, Yi
    Wu, Jie
    Gong, Zaiwu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (20)
  • [30] Estimation of PM2.5 Concentrations in New York State: Understanding the Influence of Vertical Mixing on Surface PM2.5 Using Machine Learning
    Hung, Wei-Ting
    Lu, Cheng-Hsuan
    Alessandrini, Stefano
    Kumar, Rajesh
    Lin, Chin-An
    ATMOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (12) : 1 - 21