A study on the impact of meteorological and emission factors on PM2.5 concentrations based on machine learning

被引:0
|
作者
Zhao, Chenxu [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Zejian [2 ]
Yang, Leifeng [2 ]
Jiang, Mengmeng [3 ]
Qiu, Zhubing [3 ]
Wang, Siyu [3 ]
Gu, Yu [4 ]
Ye, Wei [4 ]
Pan, Yusuo [4 ]
Zhang, Yong [2 ]
Wang, Tianxin [2 ,5 ]
Jia, Yong [1 ]
Chen, Zhihang [2 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Technol, Sch Energy & Environm, Maanshan 243002, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Ecol & Environm, South China Inst Environm Sci, Guangdong Prov Engn Lab Air Pollut Control, Guangdong Key Lab Water & Air Pollut Control, Guangzhou 510655, Peoples R China
[3] Anqing Ecol Environm Bur, Anqing 246001, Anhui, Peoples R China
[4] Anqing Ecol Environm Monitoring Ctr, Anqing 246001, Anhui, Peoples R China
[5] Anhui Univ, Sch Resources & Environm Engn, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China
关键词
PMF; Machine learning; SHAP; PDP; YANGTZE-RIVER DELTA; HEAVY POLLUTION EPISODES; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; SEASONAL-VARIATIONS; NORTH CHINA; CHEMICAL-CHARACTERIZATION; AEROSOL FORMATION; BACKGROUND SITE; CITY; HAZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124347
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PM2.5 pollution, a major environmental and health concern, is influenced by a complex interplay of emission sources and meteorological conditions. Accurately identifying these factors and their contributions is essential for effective pollution management. This study applies Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) to identify primary sources of PM2.5 and uses the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), and Partial Dependence Plots (PDP) to quantitatively assess the impact of meteorological and emission factors on PM2.5 concentrations. SHAP results reveal that meteorological factors contribute 16.6% (5.3 mu g/m3) to PM2.5, with humidity being the most influential, while emission sources account for 83.4% (26.8 mu g/ m3), with secondary particulate matter being the dominant factor. Secondary particulate matter and biomass burning significantly impacted PM2.5 in the first and fourth quarters, while dust sources became more influential in the second quarter, and coal emissions were most prominent in the second and third quarters. Twodimensional PDP analysis indicated that in the first and fourth quarters, secondary particulate matter concentration increased with air pressure, and the atmospheric oxidation process was more pronounced under highhumidity conditions during the day. Strong transport conditions, with wind direction shifting from north to east, also influenced secondary particulate matter levels. This study demonstrates that the LightGBM model effectively captures the nonlinear relationships between PM2.5 and meteorological and emission factors, providing a reliable approach for analyzing the causes of PM2.5 pollution.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction of PM2.5 hourly concentrations in Beijing based on machine learning algorithm and ground-based LiDAR
    Fang, Zhiyuan
    Yang, Hao
    Li, Cheng
    Cheng, Liangliang
    Zhao, Ming
    Xie, Chenbo
    ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2021, 47 (03) : 98 - 107
  • [32] Seasonal prediction of daily PM2.5 concentrations with interpretable machine learning: a case study of Beijing, China
    Yafei Wu
    Shaowu Lin
    Kewei Shi
    Zirong Ye
    Ya Fang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 45821 - 45836
  • [33] Seasonal prediction of daily PM2.5 concentrations with interpretable machine learning: a case study of Beijing, China
    Wu, Yafei
    Lin, Shaowu
    Shi, Kewei
    Ye, Zirong
    Fang, Ya
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (30) : 45821 - 45836
  • [34] Long Term Causality Analyses of Industrial Pollutants and Meteorological factors on PM2.5 concentrations in Zhejiang Province
    Wang, Bocheng
    Du, Quanquan
    Liu, Shengjuan
    Yan, Yanqin
    2018 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND CONTROL ENGINEERING (ICISCE 2018), 2018, : 301 - 305
  • [35] RESEARCH ON THE MAIN SOURCES AND POLLUTION METEOROLOGICAL FACTORS OF PM2.5 BASED ON MONITORING STATISTICS
    Yang, Kun
    Cui, Yifeng
    Ding, Laixiao
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2022, 23 (02): : 495 - 501
  • [36] Slower than expected reduction in annual PM2.5 in Xi'an revealed by machine learning-based meteorological normalization
    Wang, Meng
    Zhang, Zhuozhi
    Yuan, Qi
    Li, Xinwei
    Han, Shuwen
    Lam, Yuethang
    Cui, Long
    Huang, Yu
    Cao, Junji
    Lee, Shun-cheng
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 841
  • [37] Proposal of a methodology for prediction of heavy metals concentration based on PM2.5 concentration and meteorological variables using machine learning
    Park, Shin-Young
    Lee, Hye-Won
    Kwon, Jaymin
    Yoon, Sung-Won
    Lee, Cheol-Min
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [38] Proposal of a methodology for prediction of heavy metals concentration based on PM2.5 concentration and meteorological variables using machine learning
    Shin-Young Park
    Hye-Won Lee
    Jaymin Kwon
    Sung-Won Yoon
    Cheol-Min Lee
    Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment, 18
  • [39] Impact of meteorological conditions and reductions in anthropogenic emissions on PM2.5 concentrations in China from 2016 to 2020
    Xu, Zhuoying
    Peng, Zhen
    Zhang, Ning
    Liu, Hongnian
    Lei, Lili
    Kou, Xingxia
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 318
  • [40] Distinguishing Emission-Associated Ambient Air PM2.5 Concentrations and Meteorological Factor-Induced Fluctuations
    Zhong, Qirui
    Ma, Jianmin
    Shen, Guofeng
    Shen, Huizhong
    Zhu, Xi
    Yun, Xiao
    Meng, Wenjun
    Cheng, Hefa
    Liu, Junfeng
    Li, Bengang
    Wang, Xilong
    Zeng, Eddy Y.
    Guan, Dabo
    Tao, Shu
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 52 (18) : 10416 - 10425