Intravascular Imaging as a Performance Measure for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:0
|
作者
Stein, Elliot J. [1 ,2 ]
Mesenbring, Elise [3 ]
Smith, Tracy [3 ]
Hebbe, Annika [3 ]
Salahuddin, Taufiq [1 ,2 ]
Waldo, Stephen W. [3 ,4 ]
Dyal, Michael D. [5 ,6 ]
Doll, Jacob A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Seattle, WA USA
[2] VA Puget Sound Healthcare Syst, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Vet Adm Clin Assessment Reporting & Tracking Progr, Off Qual & Patient Safety, Washington, DC USA
[4] Rocky Mt Reg VA Med Syst Vet Adm, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Denver, CO USA
[5] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, Miami, FL USA
[6] Bruce W Carter Vet Adm, Miami, FL USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
hospitals; percutaneous coronary intervention; quality improvement; tomography; optical coherence; United States; OUTCOMES; ULTRASOUND; GUIDANCE; QUALITY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014528
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND:Intravascular imaging (IVI) is widely recognized to improve outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, IVI is underutilized and is not yet established as a performance measure for quality PCI. METHODS:We examined temporal trends of IVI use for all PCIs performed at Veterans Affairs hospitals in the United States from 2010 to 2022 using retrospective observational cohorts. IVI was defined as intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography. A contemporary subset of PCIs from 2020 to 2022 was used to examine clinical characteristics associated with IVI use and test the reliability of IVI as a pass/fail performance measure. We then used a generalized linear mixed model to estimate the proportion of IVI use variability attributable to the hospital, physician, and patient level. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association of IVI with clinical outcomes at 1 year. RESULTS:IVI use increased from 12.3% in 2010 to 43.1% in 2022 in 136 071 PCIs included in the study. Among 22 918 PCIs in the contemporary cohort, IVI was more frequent with nonemergent presentations, chronic total occlusions, and left main lesions but usage variability was primarily attributable to hospital (54%) and physician (33%) levels. As a pass/fail performance measure, reliability was high (>0.96) at hospital and physician levels. However, IVI use was not associated with statistically significant differences in mortality or major adverse cardiovascular events in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS:IVI use for PCI is increasing rapidly at Veterans Affairs hospitals in the United States but with marked variation at the hospital and physician levels. IVI meets established criteria for an effective performance measure and should be measured and reported by local and national organizations to encourage further uptake. Ongoing training and quality improvement may be required to maximize the benefit of IVI as it is more widely utilized.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Before and After Standardized Optimization Protocols
    Kwon, Woochan
    Hong, David
    Choi, Ki Hong
    Lee, Seung Hun
    Shin, Doosup
    Cho, Jong-Young
    Lee, Seung-Jae
    Lee, Sang Yeub
    Kim, Sang Min
    Yun, Kyeong Ho
    Cho, Jae Young
    Kim, Chan Joon
    Ahn, Hyo-Suk
    Nam, Chang-Wook
    Yoon, Hyuck-Jun
    Park, Yong Hwan
    Lee, Wang Soo
    Park, Taek Kyu
    Yang, Jeong Hoon
    Choi, Seung-Hyuk
    Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
    Bin Song, Young
    Hahn, Joo-Yong
    Lee, Joo Myung
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 17 (02) : 292 - 303
  • [42] Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention A Universal Approach for Optimization of Stent Implantation
    Shlofmitz, Evan
    Ali, Ziad A.
    Maehara, Akiko
    Mintz, Gary S.
    Shlofmitz, Richard
    Jeremias, Allen
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2020, 13 (12) : 397 - 406
  • [43] Contemporary practices using intravascular imaging guidance with IVUS or OCT to optimize percutaneous coronary intervention
    Nguyen, Peter
    Seto, Arnold
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2020, 18 (02) : 103 - 115
  • [44] In-Stent Restenosis Overview: From Intravascular Imaging to Optimal Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Management
    Shafiabadi Hassani, Neda
    Ogliari, Lucas Carlini
    Vieira de Oliveira Salerno, Pedro Rafael
    Pereira, Gabriel Tensol Rodrigues
    Ribeiro, Marcelo Harada
    Palma Dallan, Luis Augusto
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (04):
  • [45] Intravascular Imaging for Optimal Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Requirement Rather Than an Option
    Mukherjee, Debabrata
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2023, 16 (12)
  • [46] Prognosis of Percutaneous Intervention of a Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis Without the Use of Intravascular Imaging
    Mahmood, Mazhar
    Altaf, Afrasyab
    Salahuddin, Momin
    Khan, Momin
    Shah, Karamat A.
    Shah, Hammad
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 10 (06)
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness analysis of intravascular ultrasound guided percutaneous coronary intervention versus conventional percutaneous coronary intervention
    Gaster, AL
    Slothuus, U
    Larsen, J
    Thayssen, P
    Haghfelt, T
    SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL, 2001, 35 (02) : 80 - 85
  • [48] Intravascular lithotripsy during percutaneous coronary intervention: current concepts
    Gardiner, Roisin
    Muradagha, Hani
    Kiernan, Thomas J.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2022, 20 (04) : 323 - 338
  • [49] Intravascular lithotripsy in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention
    Azzalini, Lorenzo
    Bellini, Barbara
    Montorfano, Matteo
    Carlino, Mauro
    EUROINTERVENTION, 2019, 15 (11) : E1025 - E1026
  • [50] Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Practical Approach
    Lee, Chi-Hang
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 25 (01) : 86 - 94