Intravascular Imaging as a Performance Measure for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:0
|
作者
Stein, Elliot J. [1 ,2 ]
Mesenbring, Elise [3 ]
Smith, Tracy [3 ]
Hebbe, Annika [3 ]
Salahuddin, Taufiq [1 ,2 ]
Waldo, Stephen W. [3 ,4 ]
Dyal, Michael D. [5 ,6 ]
Doll, Jacob A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Seattle, WA USA
[2] VA Puget Sound Healthcare Syst, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Vet Adm Clin Assessment Reporting & Tracking Progr, Off Qual & Patient Safety, Washington, DC USA
[4] Rocky Mt Reg VA Med Syst Vet Adm, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Denver, CO USA
[5] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, Miami, FL USA
[6] Bruce W Carter Vet Adm, Miami, FL USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
hospitals; percutaneous coronary intervention; quality improvement; tomography; optical coherence; United States; OUTCOMES; ULTRASOUND; GUIDANCE; QUALITY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014528
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND:Intravascular imaging (IVI) is widely recognized to improve outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, IVI is underutilized and is not yet established as a performance measure for quality PCI. METHODS:We examined temporal trends of IVI use for all PCIs performed at Veterans Affairs hospitals in the United States from 2010 to 2022 using retrospective observational cohorts. IVI was defined as intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography. A contemporary subset of PCIs from 2020 to 2022 was used to examine clinical characteristics associated with IVI use and test the reliability of IVI as a pass/fail performance measure. We then used a generalized linear mixed model to estimate the proportion of IVI use variability attributable to the hospital, physician, and patient level. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association of IVI with clinical outcomes at 1 year. RESULTS:IVI use increased from 12.3% in 2010 to 43.1% in 2022 in 136 071 PCIs included in the study. Among 22 918 PCIs in the contemporary cohort, IVI was more frequent with nonemergent presentations, chronic total occlusions, and left main lesions but usage variability was primarily attributable to hospital (54%) and physician (33%) levels. As a pass/fail performance measure, reliability was high (>0.96) at hospital and physician levels. However, IVI use was not associated with statistically significant differences in mortality or major adverse cardiovascular events in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS:IVI use for PCI is increasing rapidly at Veterans Affairs hospitals in the United States but with marked variation at the hospital and physician levels. IVI meets established criteria for an effective performance measure and should be measured and reported by local and national organizations to encourage further uptake. Ongoing training and quality improvement may be required to maximize the benefit of IVI as it is more widely utilized.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intravascular imaging to guide percutaneous coronary intervention of complex lesions: time to renovate guidelines?
    Vergallo, Rocco
    Liuzzo, Giovanna
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44 (24) : 2157 - 2158
  • [22] Multimodality Intravascular Imaging to Predict Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Kini, Annapoorna S.
    Motoyama, Sadako
    Vengrenyuk, Yuliya
    Feig, Jonathan E.
    Pena, Jacobo
    Baber, Usman
    Bhat, Arjun M.
    Moreno, Pedro
    Kovacic, Jason C.
    Narula, Jagat
    Sharma, Samin K.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2015, 8 (07) : 937 - 945
  • [23] MULTIMODALITY INTRAVASCULAR IMAGING TO PREDICT PERIPROCEDURAL MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION DURING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION
    Kini, Annapoorna Subhash
    Motoyama, Sadako
    Vengrenyuk, Yuliya
    Pena, Jacobo
    Baber, Usman
    Bhat, Arjun
    Moreno, Pedro
    Kovacic, Jason
    Narula, Jagat
    Sharma, Samin
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (10) : A1810 - A1810
  • [24] Impact and trends of intravascular imaging in diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in inpatients in the United States
    Smilowitz, Nathaniel R.
    Mohananey, Divyanshu
    Razzouk, Louai
    Weisz, Giora
    Slater, James N.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2018, 92 (06) : E410 - E415
  • [25] Intravascular Ultrasound for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Benefits and Limitations
    Hong, Myeong-Ki
    Lee, Seung-Yul
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2021, 14 (03) : 258 - 260
  • [26] Fundamentals and role of intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention
    Xu, James
    Lo, Sidney
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2020, 10 (05) : 1358 - 1370
  • [27] Intravascular ultrasound in the current percutaneous coronary intervention era
    Sipahi, Ilke
    Nicholls, Stephen J.
    Tuzeu, E. Murat
    CARDIOLOGY CLINICS, 2006, 24 (02) : 163 - +
  • [28] The role of intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention of complex coronary lesions
    Malaiapan, Yuvaraj
    Leung, Michael
    White, Anthony J.
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2020, 10 (05) : 1371 - +
  • [29] Fifteen years of coronary intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention in Portugal
    Guerreiro, Rui Azevedo
    Fernandes, Renato
    Teles, Rui Campante
    da Silva, Pedro Canas
    Pereira, Helder
    Ferreira, Rui Cruz
    Costa, Marco
    Seixo, Filipe
    Abreu, Pedro Farto e
    Pipa, Joao Luis
    Bernardes, Luis
    Machado, Francisco Pereira
    Palos, Jose
    de Oliveira, Eduardo Infante
    Carvalho, Henrique Cyrne
    Silva, Joao Carlos
    Caires, Graca
    Martins, Dinis
    Baptista, Jose
    Calisto, Joao
    dos Santos, Rui Pontes
    Matias, Fernando
    Costa, Joao
    Sousa, Paulino
    Ribeiro, Vasco Gama
    Fiarresga, Antonio
    Silveira, Joao Brum
    REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2019, 38 (11) : 779 - 785
  • [30] The importance of intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention for small coronary arteries
    Matsushita, K
    Hirayama, H
    Nanasato, M
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (06) : 54A - 54A