Intravascular Imaging as a Performance Measure for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

被引:0
|
作者
Stein, Elliot J. [1 ,2 ]
Mesenbring, Elise [3 ]
Smith, Tracy [3 ]
Hebbe, Annika [3 ]
Salahuddin, Taufiq [1 ,2 ]
Waldo, Stephen W. [3 ,4 ]
Dyal, Michael D. [5 ,6 ]
Doll, Jacob A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Seattle, WA USA
[2] VA Puget Sound Healthcare Syst, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Vet Adm Clin Assessment Reporting & Tracking Progr, Off Qual & Patient Safety, Washington, DC USA
[4] Rocky Mt Reg VA Med Syst Vet Adm, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Denver, CO USA
[5] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, Miami, FL USA
[6] Bruce W Carter Vet Adm, Miami, FL USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
hospitals; percutaneous coronary intervention; quality improvement; tomography; optical coherence; United States; OUTCOMES; ULTRASOUND; GUIDANCE; QUALITY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014528
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND:Intravascular imaging (IVI) is widely recognized to improve outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, IVI is underutilized and is not yet established as a performance measure for quality PCI. METHODS:We examined temporal trends of IVI use for all PCIs performed at Veterans Affairs hospitals in the United States from 2010 to 2022 using retrospective observational cohorts. IVI was defined as intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography. A contemporary subset of PCIs from 2020 to 2022 was used to examine clinical characteristics associated with IVI use and test the reliability of IVI as a pass/fail performance measure. We then used a generalized linear mixed model to estimate the proportion of IVI use variability attributable to the hospital, physician, and patient level. Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess the association of IVI with clinical outcomes at 1 year. RESULTS:IVI use increased from 12.3% in 2010 to 43.1% in 2022 in 136 071 PCIs included in the study. Among 22 918 PCIs in the contemporary cohort, IVI was more frequent with nonemergent presentations, chronic total occlusions, and left main lesions but usage variability was primarily attributable to hospital (54%) and physician (33%) levels. As a pass/fail performance measure, reliability was high (>0.96) at hospital and physician levels. However, IVI use was not associated with statistically significant differences in mortality or major adverse cardiovascular events in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS:IVI use for PCI is increasing rapidly at Veterans Affairs hospitals in the United States but with marked variation at the hospital and physician levels. IVI meets established criteria for an effective performance measure and should be measured and reported by local and national organizations to encourage further uptake. Ongoing training and quality improvement may be required to maximize the benefit of IVI as it is more widely utilized.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Prognostic impact of intravascular imaging in percutaneous coronary intervention according to atherothrombotic risk
    Ha, J.
    Hong, D.
    Lee, J. M.
    Park, T. K.
    Choi, K. H.
    Hahn, J. Y.
    Song, Y. B.
    Lee, S. H.
    Lee, J. Y.
    Shin, D. S.
    Lee, S. Y.
    Gwon, H. C.
    Choi, S. H.
    Yang, J. H.
    Kim, S. M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45
  • [12] Intravascular Imaging in Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Necessary Guidance to Improve Prognosis
    Tokita, Yukichi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 211 : 363 - 364
  • [13] Intravascular Imaging-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Adequate Stent Optimization
    Kuno, Toshiki
    Kiyohara, Yuko
    Kohsaka, Shun
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2024, 17 (10) : 1244 - 1245
  • [14] Prognostic impact of intravascular imaging in percutaneous coronary intervention according to procedural complexity
    Song, P. S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45
  • [15] Intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention according to lesion complexity
    Lee, S. Y.
    Lee, S. J.
    Kwon, W. C.
    Lee, S. H.
    Shin, D. S.
    Lee, J. Y.
    Lee, J. M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45
  • [16] Intravascular Ultrasound for Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    de la Torre Hernandez, Jose M.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2019, 12 (07) : 621 - 623
  • [17] Intravascular Imaging for Complex Coronary Intervention
    Guner, Ahmet
    Akturk, Ibrahim Faruk
    Cizgici, Ahmet Yasar
    Uzun, Fatih
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (21) : e207 - e207
  • [18] Imaging in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Satish, Mohan
    Roumeliotis, Anastasios
    Power, David
    Camaj, Anton
    Nicolas, Johny
    Feldman, Daniel
    Jones, Davis
    Yasumura, Keisuke
    Beerkens, Frans
    Suleman, Saman
    Dangas, George
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (06)
  • [19] Intravascular Imaging Guidance During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Current Evidence and Future Outlook
    Vavilin, Ilan
    Jamil, Yasser
    Mcauliffe, Jacob
    Truesdell, Alexander G.
    CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2025, 27 (01)
  • [20] Intravascular imaging during percutaneous coronary intervention: temporal trends and clinical outcomes in the USA
    Fazel, Reza
    Yeh, Robert W.
    Cohen, David J.
    Rao, Sunil, V
    Li, Siling
    Song, Yang
    Secemsky, Eric A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2023, 44 (38) : 3845 - 3855