Low-Value Care De-implementation: Practices for Systemwide Reduction

被引:4
|
作者
Sorenson, Corinna [1 ]
Japinga, Mark [2 ]
Crook, Hannah [3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Duke Margolis Ctr Hlth Policy, Sanford Sch Publ Policy, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Margolis Ctr Hlth Policy, Washington, DC USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Policy, Nashville, TN USA
来源
关键词
CULTURE;
D O I
10.1056/CAT.21.0387
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite a growing body of evidence documenting the problem of low-value care, our understanding of how to effectively reduce or eliminate it remains limited. Through semistructured interviews with U.S. health care organizations with demonstrated experience and success in low-value care reduction, the authors sought to elucidate how different stakeholders across the system approach low-value care de-implementation in practice and the key strategies and actions used. The analysis identified four key phases of low-value care de-implementation: (1) plan and assemble, (2) identify and assess, (3) de-implement, and (4) evaluate and disseminate. De-implementation is an iterative, multiphased, multicomponent process marked by ongoing learning and feedback loops. Each organization approached low-value care de-implementation with a strong orientation toward experimentation and continuous improvement and as a central tenet of a broader organizational mission to improve health and health care value. To combat the complex drivers that facilitate and sustain low-value care provision, organizations adopted a range of strategies, resources, and tools to inform, implement, and drive their de-implementation efforts. Such features included, but were not limited to, senior leadership support and aligning low-value care initiatives with unifying organizational values and priorities; physician leadership and empowerment; de-implementation infrastructure supports across people, data, and technology; education and engagement opportunities for providers, patients, and staff; data-driven techniques to measure and track low-value care, benchmark performance, and embed or link de-implementation targets within payment, network design, and care pathways; and ongoing relations with internal teams and external stakeholders and partners to disseminate and scale de-implementation best practices. While health care organizations are complex and unique - with their own culture, workforce mix, resources, and priorities - these identified experiences and practices from organizations successful in de-implementation can inform and empower others across the health care landscape to act, innovate, and move the needle on systemwide low-value care reduction.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] De-Implementation of Low-Value Breast Cancer Care: Early Results of the Choosing Wisely Campaign in Breast Surgical Oncology
    Shubeck, Sarah P.
    Smith, Margaret E.
    Wang, Ton
    Hughes, Tasha
    Dossett, Lesly A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2019, 229 (04) : S260 - S261
  • [42] Barriers and Facilitators to De-Implementation of the Choosing Wisely® Guidelines for Low-Value Breast Cancer Surgery
    Smith, Margaret E.
    Vitous, C. Ann
    Hughes, Tasha M.
    Shubeck, Sarah P.
    Jagsi, Reshma
    Dossett, Lesly A.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 27 (08) : 2653 - 2663
  • [43] Understanding low-value care and associated de-implementation processes: a qualitative study of Choosing Wisely Interventions across Canadian hospitals
    Parker, Gillian
    Kastner, Monika
    Born, Karen
    Shahid, Nida
    Berta, Whitney
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [44] Understanding low-value care and associated de-implementation processes: a qualitative study of Choosing Wisely Interventions across Canadian hospitals
    Gillian Parker
    Monika Kastner
    Karen Born
    Nida Shahid
    Whitney Berta
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [45] De-implementation of Low-value Care in Women ≥70 Years with Low-risk Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Wang, Ton
    Weed, Christina
    Tseng, Joshua
    Chung, Alice
    Boyle, Marissa
    Amersi, Farin
    Giuliano, Armando
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (SUPPL 2) : S289 - S290
  • [46] A Tailored De-Implementation Strategy to Reduce Low-Value Home-Based Nursing Care: A Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study
    Wendt, Benjamin
    Nieuwboer, Minke S.
    Vermeulen, Hester
    Huisman-de Waal, Getty
    van Dulmen, Simone A.
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2024,
  • [47] The de-implementation and persistence of low-value HIV prevention interventions in the United States: a cross-sectional study
    Mckay, Virginia R.
    Combs, Todd B.
    Dolcini, M. Margaret
    Brownson, Ross C.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 1 (01):
  • [48] De-implementation to reduce coercive practices in mental health care
    Sergerie-Richard, Sophie
    Goulet, Marie-Helene
    Dumais, Alexandre
    Hinse, Catherine
    Fontaine, Guillaume
    LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 11 (07): : 498 - 499
  • [49] Effects of de-implementation strategies aimed at reducing low-value nursing procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tessa Rietbergen
    Denise Spoon
    Anja H. Brunsveld-Reinders
    Jan W. Schoones
    Anita Huis
    Maud Heinen
    Anke Persoon
    Monique van Dijk
    Hester Vermeulen
    Erwin Ista
    Leti van Bodegom-Vos
    Implementation Science, 15
  • [50] De-Implementation of Low-Value Care for Women 70 Years of Age or Older with Low-Risk Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Ton Wang
    Christina Weed
    Joshua Tseng
    Alice Chung
    Marissa K. Boyle
    Farin Amersi
    Jaswinder Jutla
    Amin Mirhadi
    Armando E. Giuliano
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2023, 30 : 8308 - 8319