Low-Value Care De-implementation: Practices for Systemwide Reduction

被引:4
|
作者
Sorenson, Corinna [1 ]
Japinga, Mark [2 ]
Crook, Hannah [3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Duke Margolis Ctr Hlth Policy, Sanford Sch Publ Policy, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Durham, NC 27708 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Duke Margolis Ctr Hlth Policy, Washington, DC USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Policy, Nashville, TN USA
来源
关键词
CULTURE;
D O I
10.1056/CAT.21.0387
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Despite a growing body of evidence documenting the problem of low-value care, our understanding of how to effectively reduce or eliminate it remains limited. Through semistructured interviews with U.S. health care organizations with demonstrated experience and success in low-value care reduction, the authors sought to elucidate how different stakeholders across the system approach low-value care de-implementation in practice and the key strategies and actions used. The analysis identified four key phases of low-value care de-implementation: (1) plan and assemble, (2) identify and assess, (3) de-implement, and (4) evaluate and disseminate. De-implementation is an iterative, multiphased, multicomponent process marked by ongoing learning and feedback loops. Each organization approached low-value care de-implementation with a strong orientation toward experimentation and continuous improvement and as a central tenet of a broader organizational mission to improve health and health care value. To combat the complex drivers that facilitate and sustain low-value care provision, organizations adopted a range of strategies, resources, and tools to inform, implement, and drive their de-implementation efforts. Such features included, but were not limited to, senior leadership support and aligning low-value care initiatives with unifying organizational values and priorities; physician leadership and empowerment; de-implementation infrastructure supports across people, data, and technology; education and engagement opportunities for providers, patients, and staff; data-driven techniques to measure and track low-value care, benchmark performance, and embed or link de-implementation targets within payment, network design, and care pathways; and ongoing relations with internal teams and external stakeholders and partners to disseminate and scale de-implementation best practices. While health care organizations are complex and unique - with their own culture, workforce mix, resources, and priorities - these identified experiences and practices from organizations successful in de-implementation can inform and empower others across the health care landscape to act, innovate, and move the needle on systemwide low-value care reduction.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] How do healthcare professionals make decisions concerning low-value care practices? Study protocol of a factorial survey experiment on de-implementation
    Roczniewska, Marta
    von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
    Augustsson, Hanna
    Nilsen, Per
    Ingvarsson, Sara
    Hasson, Henna
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 2 (01):
  • [32] Reducing low-value care: what can we learn from eight de-implementation studies in the Netherlands?
    Verkerk, Eva W.
    van Dulmen, Simone A.
    Westert, Gert P.
    Hooft, Lotty
    Heus, Pauline
    Kool, Rudolf B.
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2022, 11 (03)
  • [33] Does de-implementation of low-value care impact the patient-clinician relationship? A mixed methods study
    Michelle S. Rockwell
    Kenan C. Michaels
    John W. Epling
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [34] Empirical and conceptual investigation of de-implementation of low-value care from professional and health care system perspectives: a study protocol
    Henna Hasson
    Per Nilsen
    Hanna Augustsson
    Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz
    Implementation Science, 13
  • [35] Empirical and conceptual investigation of de-implementation of low-value care from professional and health care system perspectives: a study protocol
    Hasson, Henna
    Nilsen, Per
    Augustsson, Hanna
    Schwarz, Ulrica von Thiele
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13
  • [36] Reporting of costs and economic impacts in randomized trials of de-implementation interventions for low-value care: a systematic scoping review
    Falkenbach, Petra
    Raudasoja, Aleksi J. J.
    Vernooij, Robin W. M.
    Mustonen, Jussi M. J.
    Agarwal, Arnav
    Aoki, Yoshitaka
    Blanker, Marco H. H.
    Cartwright, Rufus
    Garcia-Perdomo, Herney A. A.
    Kilpelaeinen, Tuomas P. P.
    Lainiala, Olli
    Lamberg, Tiina
    Nevalainen, Olli P. O.
    Raittio, Eero
    Richard, Patrick O. O.
    Violette, Philippe D. D.
    Tikkinen, Kari A. O.
    Sipilae, Raija
    Turpeinen, Miia
    Komulainen, Jorma
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [37] Reporting of costs and economic impacts in randomized trials of de-implementation interventions for low-value care: a systematic scoping review
    Petra Falkenbach
    Aleksi J. Raudasoja
    Robin W. M. Vernooij
    Jussi M. J. Mustonen
    Arnav Agarwal
    Yoshitaka Aoki
    Marco H. Blanker
    Rufus Cartwright
    Herney A. Garcia-Perdomo
    Tuomas P. Kilpeläinen
    Olli Lainiala
    Tiina Lamberg
    Olli P. O. Nevalainen
    Eero Raittio
    Patrick O. Richard
    Philippe D. Violette
    Kari A. O. Tikkinen
    Raija Sipilä
    Miia Turpeinen
    Jorma Komulainen
    Implementation Science, 18
  • [38] Barriers and Facilitators to De-Implementation of the Choosing Wisely® Guidelines for Low-Value Breast Cancer Surgery
    Margaret E. Smith
    C. Ann Vitous
    Tasha M. Hughes
    Sarah P. Shubeck
    Reshma Jagsi
    Lesly A. Dossett
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2020, 27 : 2653 - 2663
  • [39] Engaging patients in de-implementation interventions to reduce low-value clinical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sypes, Emma E.
    de Grood, Chloe
    Whalen-Browne, Liam
    Clement, Fiona M.
    Leigh, Jeanna Parsons
    Niven, Daniel J.
    Stelfox, Henry T.
    BMC MEDICINE, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [40] Engaging patients in de-implementation interventions to reduce low-value clinical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Emma E. Sypes
    Chloe de Grood
    Liam Whalen-Browne
    Fiona M. Clement
    Jeanna Parsons Leigh
    Daniel J. Niven
    Henry T. Stelfox
    BMC Medicine, 18